Bio-psycho-social correlates of the perceived crowding in different contexts

  1. Rafael Tomás 1
  2. María Amérigo 1
  3. Juan A. García 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (España)
Journal:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Year of publication: 2016

Volume: 28

Issue: 4

Pages: 394-400

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Psicothema

Abstract

Background: This paper analyzes the experience of crowding through a biopsychosocial approach to human behavior which empirically joins different dimensions that the literature has analyzed separately. The main aim consists of identifying factors involved in perceived crowding from (a) the emotional response and affective meaning (BIO dimension); (b) the perception of psychological well-being and personality traits (PSYCHO dimension), and (c) sociodemographic characteristics (SOCIO dimension). Method: 761 adults completed an online questionnaire that included an assessment of images representing four high- and low-density functional and residential contexts. The data were analyzed through four hierarchical regressions, one for each spatial context. Results: Although the results vary depending on the contexts analyzed, the prevalence of the variables from the BIO dimension in functional contexts, as opposed to residential contexts, is highlighted. The latter spaces show greater heterogeneity regarding the explanatory power of the experience of crowding. Conclusions: The response to crowding experienced in residential environments shows a greater range of variables involved, supporting the idea of these spaces’ greater complexity, insofar as they are psychologically adaptive.

Bibliographic References

  • Alonso, J., Prieto, L., & Antó, J. M. (1995). La versión española del SF36 Health Survey (Cuestionario de Salud SF-36): un instrumento para la medida de los resultados clínicos [The Spanish version of the SF36 Health Survey: An instrument for measuring clinical outcomes]. Medicina Clínica, 104, 771-776.
  • Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Altman, I., & Rogoff, B. (1987). World-views in psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic and transactional perspectives. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 7-40). New York: Wiley.
  • Aragonés, J. I., Amérigo, M., & Pérez-López, R. (2010). Perception of personal identity at home. Psicothema, 22, 872-879.
  • Aragonés, J. I., Poggio, L., Sevillano, V., Pérez-López, R., & SánchezBernardos, M. L. (2015). Measuring warmth and competence at intergroup, interpersonal and individual levels. Revista de Psicología Social, 30, 407-438.
  • Aziraj, V., & Ceramic, S. (2013). Differences in the size of personal space between persons with anxious and persons with psychotic disorders. Psychiatria Danubina, 25, 163-169.
  • Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. (2001). Environmental psychology. Orlando, FL: Hartcourt College Publishers.
  • Bonnes, M., Bonaiuto, M., & Ercolani, A. P. (1991). Crowding and residential satisfaction in the urban environment: A contextual approach. Environment and Behavior, 23, 531-552.
  • Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The Self-assessment Manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49-59.
  • Corraliza, J. A. (1987). La experiencia del ambiente. Percepción y significado del medio construido [The environment experience. Perception and meaning of the built environment]. Madrid: Tecnos.
  • Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(3). Retrieved from: http://pareonline.net/pdf/v17n3.pdf
  • Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gómez-Jacinto, L., & Hombrados-Mendieta, I. (2002). Multiple effects of community and household crowding. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 233-246.
  • Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday.
  • Hombrados-Mendieta, I. (2010). Hacinamiento [Crowding]. In J. I. Aragonés & M. Amérigo (Eds.), Psicología ambiental (pp. 141-162). Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Ittelson, W. H. (1973). Environment and cognition. New York: Seminar Press.
  • Magalhães, E., & Calheiros, M. M. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of place attachment scale for youth in residential care. Psicothema, 27, 65-73.
  • Milgram, S. (1970). The experience of living in cities. Science, 167, 1461-1468.
  • Molina, C., Meléndez, J. C., & Navarro, E. (2008). Bienestar y calidad de vida en ancianos institucionalizados y no institucionalizados [Well-being and life quality among old people living and not living in institutions for the elderly]. Anales de Psicología, 24, 312-319.
  • Morris, D. (1979). Manwatching: A field guide to human behavior. New York: Abrams.
  • Ozdemir, M. (2011). Marketing management in construction industry: Cultural differences in consumers’ housing choice. Problems of Management in the 21st Century, 1. Retrieved from http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/pmc/view/biblio/year/2011/volume/1
  • Parsons, R., & Tassinary, L G. (2002). Environmental psychophysiology. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 172-190). New York: Wiley.
  • Pérez-López, R., Aragonés, J. I., & Amérigo, M. (2013). Thin slices of competence and warmth via personalized primary spaces. Psyecology, 4, 267-286.
  • Rodin, J., Solomon, S. K., & Metcalf, J. (1978). Role of control in mediating perceptions of density. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 988-999.
  • Rollero, C. (2013). The town in my mind: How place attachment and identification are linked to place perception. Estudios de Psicología, 34, 309-314.
  • Russell, J. A., & Pratt, G (1980). A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 311-322.
  • Santoyo, C., & Anguera, M. T. (1992). El hacinamiento como contexto: estrategias metodológicas para su análisis [Crowding as context: Analytical and methodological strategies]. Psicothema, 4, 551-569.
  • Stokols, D. (1976). The experience of crowding in primary and secondary environments. Environment and Behavior, 8, 49-86.
  • Terracciano, A., Abdel-Khalek, A. M., Adam, N., Adamovová, L., Ahn, C-k., Ahn, H.-n., McCrae, R. R. (2005). National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 cultures. Science, 310, 96-100.
  • Tomás, R. (2015). Hacinamiento, estrés ambiental y espacio personal: una aproximación bio-psico-social al comportamiento espacial en humanos [Crowding, environmental stress and personal space: A bio-psico-social approach to human spatial behavior]. Retrieved from https://ruidera.uclm.es/xmlui/handle/10578/7766
  • Tomás, R., Amérigo, M., & Aragonés, J. I. (2016). Affective assessment of high and low-density residential and functional environments. Anales de Psicología. doi: 10.6018/analesps.32.3.220941
  • Vaske, J. J., & Shelby, L. B. (2008). Crowding as a descriptive indicator and an evaluative standard: Results from 30 years of research. Leisure Sciences, 30, 111-126.
  • Wapner, S., & Demick, J. (2002). The increasing contexts of context in the study of environment behavior relations. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 3-14). New York: Wiley.
  • Werner, C. M., Brown, B. B., & Altman, I. (2002). Transactionally oriented research: Examples and strategies. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 203-221). New York: Wiley.
  • Yildirim, K., & Akalin-Baskaya, A. (2007). Perceived crowding in a café/ restaurant with different seating densities. Building and Environment, 42, 3410-3417.
Data source: Dialnet