Imitation and Distinction. History of Two Theoretical Concepts in Social PsychologyThe legacy of Simmel, Tarde and Bourdieu

  1. Caballero de la Torre, Vicente 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Revista de historia de la psicología

ISSN: 0211-0040 2445-0928

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 42

Número: 4

Páginas: 15-20

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de historia de la psicología

Resumen

La Escuela de los Anales subrayó la importancia de los mecanismos inconscientes que perpetúan los fenómenos sociales. Tales mecanismos pueden ser entendidos como objeto de microanálisis por parte de múltiples ciencias sociales. En Psicología Social, los conceptos teóricos de imitación y distinción se encuentran en el mismo micronivel y han sido objeto de tal microanálisis por parte de tres eminentes sociólogos. El pensamiento de Simmel, Tarde y Bourdieu es expuesto con el fin de mostrar la relevancia histórica de sus aportes entorno a estos conceptos clave a nivel micro. A modo de conclusión, el artículo pretende ser motivo de reflexión para investigadores innovadores en relación con: los límites que separan su disciplina de la Sociología; la interdisciplinariedad al abordar conceptos teóricos subyacentes a la disciplina (como imitación y distinción); y, finalmente, la pertinencia de estos clásicos contemporáneos para comprender fenómenos que suceden en un mundo social cada vez más reticular.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Allport, F. H. (1924). Social Psychology. Boston, USA: Houghton-Mifflin. Retrieved from https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Allport/1924/1924_toc.html
  • Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men; research in human relations (pp. 177–190). Carnegie Press. Retrieved from https://www. gwern.net/docs/psychology/1952-asch.pdf
  • Baldwin, J. M. (1894). Imitation: A chapter in the natural History of consciousness. Mind, 3(9), 26-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/III.9.26
  • Bandura, A. (1965). Vicarious processes: A case of no-trial learning. In Advances in experimental Social Psychology Vol. 2. (pp. 1-55). Academic Press. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60102-1
  • Bandura, A., Grusec, J. E., & Menlove, F. L. (1967). Vicarious extinction of avoidance behavior. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 5(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024182
  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.
  • Braudel, F. (1958). Histoire et sciences sociales: la longue durée. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 13(4), 725-753. https://doi.org/10.3406/ahess.1958.2781
  • Broughton, J. (1978). Development of concepts of self, mind, reality, and knowledge. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1978(1), 75-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219780106
  • Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. Journal of personality and social psychology, 8, 377- 383. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025589
  • Denis A. (2014). Methodological Individualism and Society: Hayek’s Evolving View. In: Nell G.L. (eds.) Austrian Economic Perspectives on Individualism and Society (pp. 7-20). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi. org/10.1057/9781137368843_2
  • Goffman, E. (1956). The Nature of Deference and Demeanor. American Anthropologist, 58(3), 473-502. https://doi.org/10.1525/ aa.1956.58.3.02a00070
  • Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 205(1161), 581-598. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0086
  • Higgins, E. T. (1992). Social cognition as a social science: How social action creates meaning. In D. N. Ruble, P. R. Costanzo, & M. E. Oliveri (eds.), The Social Psychology of mental health: Basic mechanisms and applications (pp. 241–278). Guilford Press.
  • Hill, Darryl. (2006). Theory in Applied Social Psychology: Past Mistakes and Future Hopes. Theory & Psychology, 16(5) 613-640. https://doi. org/10.1177/0959354306067440
  • Hoffman, C. & Hurst, N. (1990). Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization? Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 58(2). https:// doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.197
  • Hogg, M. A. & Vaughan, G. M. (2018). Social Psychology. Harlow, United Kingdom; New York, USA: Pearson.
  • Hurley, S. L., & Chater, N. (eds.). (2005). Perspectives on Imitation: Imitation, human development, and culture (Vol. 2). Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
  • Huxley, J. (1942). Evolution. The modern synthesis. Allen & Unwin. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.280031
  • Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral Economics. American economic review, 93(5), 1449-1475. https://doi. org/10.1257/000282803322655392
  • Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200106
  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers (Edited by Dorwin Cartwright). New York: USA: Harper and Brothers. https://doi. org/10.1177/000271625127600135
  • Lin, R. (2018). Silver lining of envy on social media? The relationships between post content, envy type, and purchase intentions. Internet Research, 28(4),1142-1164. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2017-0203
  • Lin, R., & Utz, S. (2015). The emotional responses of browsing Facebook: Happiness, envy, and the role of tie strength. Computers in human behavior, 52, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.064
  • Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris, France: PUF.
  • Parker, I. (2013). The Crisis in Modern Social Psychology (Psychology Revivals): and how to end it. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
  • Phaf, R. H. (2020). Publish less, read more. Theory and Psychology, 30(2), 263- 285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319898250
  • Picavet, E. (2015). Methodological individualism in Sociology. In Neil J. Smelser & Paul B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 9751-9755). Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier. https://doi. org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02022-2
  • Richer, Z. (2015). Toward a social topography: Status as a spatial practice.Sociological Theory, 33(4), 347-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275115617802
  • Rosenfield, D., Greenberg, J., Folger, R., & Borys, R. (1982). Effect of an encounter with a black panhandler on subsequent helping for blacks: Tokenism or confirming a negative stereotype? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8(4), 664-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167282084010
  • Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of experimental Social Psychology, 13(3), 279-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022- 1031(77)90049-X
  • Simmel, G. (1908). Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Leipzig, Germany: Duncker & Humblot. Retrieved from https://openlibrary.org/books/OL7010868M/Soziologie
  • Simmel, G. (1970). Grundfragen der Soziologie: (Individuum und Gesellschaft). Berlin: Germany: Walter de Gruyter & Co. Retrieved from https://www. ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/59861/ssoar-1970-simmelGrundfragen_der_Soziologie_Individuum_und.pdf
  • Tarde, G. (1895). Les lois de l’imitation. Félix Alcan. Retrieved from http:// classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/tarde_gabriel/lois_imitation/tarde_lois_ imitation.pdf
  • Tarde, G. (1902). Psychologie économique (Vol. 2). Félix Alcan. Retrieved from http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/tarde_gabriel/psycho_economique_t1/ psycho_economique_t1.pdf
  • Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183-206. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099- 0771(199909)12:3<183::AID-BDM318>3.0.CO;2-F
  • Vallacher, R. R., Read, S. J., & Nowak, A. (eds.). (2017). Computational Social Psychology. London, United Kingdom: Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315173726