Foundations for the Design of a Creative System Based on the Analysis of the Main Techniques that Stimulate Human Creativity

  1. L. De Garrido 1
  2. J. J. Gómez Sanz 2
  3. J. Pavón 2
  1. 1 Architecture Department, and Psychobiology Department. Universitat de València (Spain)
  2. 2 Institute of Knowledge Technology. Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Spain)
Revista:
IJIMAI

ISSN: 1989-1660

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 7

Número: 2

Páginas: 199-211

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.9781/IJIMAI.2021.03.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: IJIMAI

Resumen

This work presents the design of a computational system with creative capacity, based on the synthesis of the main methods that stimulate human creativity. When analyzing each method, a set of characteristics that the computer system must have in order to emulate a creative capacity has been suggested. In this way, by integrating all the suggestions in a structured way, it is possible to design the general architecture and functioning strategy of a computer system that has the incremental creative capacity of well-known creative methods. This computational system is designed as a multi-agent system, made up of two groups of agents, the problem solving group and the creative group, the first one exploring and evaluating paths for suitable solutions, the second implementing creative methods to generate new paths that are provided to the first group.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

This work has been partially supported by the project “Collaborative Design for the Promotion of the Well-Being in Inclusive Smart Cities (DColbici3)” (grant TIN2017-88327-R) funded by the Spanish Ministry for Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • L. De Garrido, J. Gomez Sanz, J. Pavón, “Agent-based Modeling of Collaborative Creative Processes with INGENIAS,” AI Communications, vol. 32, no. 3, 2019, pp. 223-233.
  • M. Boden, “Creativity and artificial intelligence”, in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 103, no. 1-2, 1998, pp. 347-356.
  • M. Boden, “Creativity,” in Artificial Intelligence, Academic Press, 1996, pp. 267-291.
  • K. Jennings, “Developing creativity: Artificial barriers in artificial intelligence,” in Minds and Machines, vol. 20, no. 4, 2010, pp. 489-501.
  • R. A. Brooks, “Intelligence without reason”. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Artificial Intelligence Memo No. 1293, 2010.
  • M. Rhodes, “An analysis of creativity,” in Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 42, no. 7, 1961, 305–310.
  • A. Jordanous, “Four PPPPerspectives on computational creativity in theory and in practice,” in Connection Science, vol. 28, no. 2, 2016, pp. 194-216.
  • C. Lamb, D.G. Brown, and C. Clarke, “Evaluating computational creativity: An interdisciplinary tutorial,” in ACM Computing Surveys vol. 51, no. 2, 2018, pp. 1-34.
  • G. A. Wiggins, “A preliminary framework for description, analysis and comparison of creative systems,” in Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 19, no. 7, 2006, pp. 449-458.
  • M. Martin, and K.I. Voigt, “What Do We Really Know about Creativity Techniques? A Review of the Empirical Literature,” The Role of Creativity in the Management of Innovation, 2017, pp. 181-203.
  • S. A. Leybourne, “The Creativity Matrix: Balancing Architectural and Process Creativity in Project-based Management,” in IRNOP Conference, Oslo, Norway, 2013, pp. 17-19.
  • V. Tang, J. Luo, “Idea matrix and creativity operators,” in DS 75-7: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13), Design for Harmonies, Vol.7: Human Behaviour in Design, Seoul, Korea, 2013, pp. 19-22.
  • M. A. Runco, Problem Finding, Problem Solving, and Creativity, California, USA, Greenwood Publishing Group, 1994.
  • I. Wopereis, E. Derix “Seeking Creativity: A Case Study on Information Problem Solving in Professional Music,” in Kurbanoğlu S. et al. (eds) Information Literacy: Key to an Inclusive Society, ECIL 2016, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 676, Springer, 2016.
  • J. G. Rawlinson, Creative thinking and brainstorming, Routledge, 2017.
  • A. F. Osborn, “Creative Thinking,” in American Association of Industrial Nurses Journal, vol. 6, no. 9, 1954, pp. 23-25.
  • M. E. Raichle, “The brain’s default mode network,” in Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 38, 2015, pp. 433-447.
  • L. De Garrido, Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the composition of architectural objects. PhD Thesis, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Spain, 1989.
  • E. De Bono, The Use of Lateral Thinking, London, Jonathan Cape Ltd. 1967.
  • E. De Bono, Six thinking hats, London, UK, Penguin, 2017.
  • F. Garijo, and L. De Garrido, “A knowledge based system for house design,” in Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1988, pp. 806-809.
  • O. López-Ortega, “Computer-assisted creativity: Emulation of cognitive processes on a multi-agent system,” in Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no.9, 2013, pp. 3459-3470.
  • C. Olszak, and T. Bartus, “Multi-agent approach in designing of organizational creativity support,” in The European Conference on Information Systems Management, Academic Conferences International Limited, 2015, pp. 93.
  • L. Macedo, and A. Cardoso, “Using Surprise to Create Products that get the Attention of other Agents,” in AAAI Fall Symposium, 2011, pp. 79-84.
  • M. d’Inverno, and M. Luck, “Creativity through autonomy and interaction,” in Cognitive Computation, 4(3), 2012, pp. 332-346.
  • G. R. Greenfield, ”Computational aesthetics as a tool for creativity,” in Proceedings of the 5th conference on Creativity & cognition, 2015, pp. 232-235.
  • U. Lösch, J. Dugdale, Y. Demazeau, “Requirements for supporting individual human creativity in the design domain,” in International Conference on Entertainment Computing, Springer, 2009, pp. 210-215.
  • R. Sosa, J. S. Gero, “A computational framework for the study of creativity and innovation in design: Effects of social ties,” in Design Computing and Cognition’04, Springer, 2004 pp. 499-517.
  • A. Kirke, E. Miranda, “Emotional and multi-agent systems in computeraided writing and poetry,” in Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence and Poetry Symposium, 2013, pp. 17-22.
  • G. Méndez, P. Gervás, and C. León, “A model of character affinity for agent-based story generation,” in 9th International Conference on Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems, Limassol, Cyprus, vol. 11, 2014.
  • J. Pavón, J. J. Gómez-Sanz, R. Fuentes, “The INGENIAS methodology and tools,” in Agent-oriented methods, IGI Global, Idea Group Publishing, 2005, pp. 236-276.
  • J.J. Shah, S.M. Smith, N. Vargas-Hernandez, “Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness,” in Design Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, 2003, pp. 111-134.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet