Technological sovereignty of the EU in advanced 5G mobile communications: An empirical approach

Bibliographic References

• Alvarez, I., & Martin, V. (2020). Cadenas de valor en Europa y autonomía estrat ́egica. ICE, Revista de Economía, 916, 185–205. https://doi.org/10.32796/ ice.2020.916.7097. In this issue.
• Aqlan, F., & Lam, S. (2015). Supply chain risk modelling and mitigation. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1047975
• Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A., & Frenz, M. (2019). Investment in innovation for European recovery: A public policy priority. Science and Public Policy, 47/1, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz049
• Bekar, C., Carlaw, K., & Lipsey, R. (2018). General purpose technologies in theory, application and controversy: A review. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28, 1005–1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-017-0546-0
• Bekkers, R., Henkel, J., Tur, E., van der Vorst, T., Driesse, M., Kang, B., ... Teubner, L. (2020). Pilot Study for Essentiality Assessment of Standard Essential Patents. In Nikolaus Thumm (Ed.). Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union, Article JRC119894. In this issue.
• Borrell, J. (2020a). Why European strategic autonomy matters, A window on the world - blog by HR/VP, dic 2020. https://eeas.europa.eu accessed 23 Jul 2021.
• Borrell, J. (2020b). European strategic complacency is not an option. A Window on the World - Blog by HR/VP Josep Borrell. https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/ headquarters-homepage/88782/european-strategic-complacency-not-option_en.
• Brandon-Jones, E., Squire, B., Autry, C. W., & Petersen, K. J. (2014). A contingent resource-based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50/3, 55–73.
• Bresnahan, T., & Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General purpose technologies: ‘Engines of growth. Journal of Economics, 65, 83–108.
• Buggenhagen, M., & Blind, K. (2022). Development of 5G – identifying organizations active in publishing, patenting, and standardization. Telecommunications Policy 46/4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102326
• Capozza, C., & Divella, M. (2018). Human capital and firms’ innovation: Evidence from emerging economies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 28(7), 741–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2018.1557426
• Cartwright, M. (2020). Internationalising state power through the internet: Google, Huawei and geopolitical struggle. Internet Policy Review, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.3.1494
• CEPII. (2020). Chaînes de valeur mondiales et d ́ependances de la production française, La lettre du CEPII. Centre d’Etudes Prospectives et d’Informations Internationales, 22 Jul 2021 https://www.cepii.fr/LaLettreDuCEPII.
• Cohen, W., Goto, A., Nagata, A., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Research Policy, 31, 1349–1367.
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99(379), 569–596.
• Corenect. (2020). European Core Technologies for future connectivity systems and components, Report WP2 (Strategy, vision, and requirements) (p. H2020). ICT-42-2020.
• Cornell University. (2021). Global innovation index 2021: Innovation investments resilient despite COVID-19 pandemic. Cornell University, INSEAD & World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
• Corsi, S., Di Minin, A., & Piccaluga, A. (2015). Reverse innovation at speres: A case study in China. Research-Technology Management, 57(4), 28–34.
• Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1154–1191.
• DEC-EC. (2020). Decision etudes & conseil ‘study on the electronics ecosystem. Overview, developments and Europe’s position in the world’, DG communications networks. European Commission: Content and Technology.
• Dosi, G., Llerena, P., & Labini, M. S. (2006). The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European paradox’. Research Policy, 35, 1450–1464.
• EC European Commission. (2019a). EU-China – a strategic outlook,. Strasbourg.
• EC European Commission. (2020a). Critical materials for strategic technologies and sectors in the EU - a foresight study. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2873/58081. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/42881
• EC European Commission. (2020b). Critical raw materials resilience: Charting a path towards greater security and sustainability. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• EC European Commission. (2021). Strategic dependencies and capacities. Brussels.
• EC European Commission. (2022). A chips act for Europe, COM(2022) 45 final. Brussels.
• Edler, J., Blind, K., Frietsch, R., Kimpeler, S., Kroll, H., Lerch, C., Reiss, T., Roth, F., Schubert, T., Schuler, J., & Walz, R. (2020). Technology sovereignty. From demand to concept. Karlsruhe, Germany: Fraunhofer Institute for systems and innovation Research (ISI). A. da Ponte et al.
• J. Edler, K. Blind, H. Kroll, T. Schubert Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy- defining rationales, ends and means Fraunhofer ISI discussion papers innovation systems and policy analysis n, Vol. 70 (2021)
• Electronic Components and Systems (ECS) Strategic research agenda (SRA) berlin, Germany
• EPRS - European Parliamentary Research Service Strategic sovereignty for Europe, EPRS ideas paper, towards a more resilient EU (2020)
• Edler, J., Blind, K., Kroll, H., & Schubert, T. (2021). Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy- defining rationales, ends and means. In Fraunhofer ISI discussion papers innovation systems and policy analysis n (Vol. 70).
• Karlsruhe July 2021. Electronic Components and Systems (ECS). (2021). Strategic research agenda (SRA) berlin, Germany.
• EPRS - European Parliamentary Research Service. (2020). Strategic sovereignty for Europe, EPRS ideas paper, towards a more resilient EU. European Parliament. (2019). 5G in the EU and Chinese telecoms suppliers. EPRS European Parliamentary Research Service.
• Eurostat. (2013). Economy-wide material flow accounts (EW-MFA), compilation guide. Eurostat.
• F ̈agersten, B., & Rühlig, T. (2019). ‘China’s standard power and its geopolitical implications for Europe’. Stockholm: Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
• Frías, Z., & P ́erez Martínez, J. (2017). 5G networks: Will technology and policy collide? Telecommunications Policy, 42/8, 612–621.
• Gartner. (2021). Gartner magic quadrant for 5G network infrastructure for communications service providers.
• Gilles, F., & Toth, J. (2021). Accelerating the 5G transition in Europe: How to boost investments in transformative 5G solutions. Luxemburg: European Investment Bank.
• Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey Part I. NBER WP series. WP no. 3301.
• Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, 10(1), 92–116.
• Grupp, H., & Schubert, T. (2010). Review and new evidence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating national performance. Research Policy, 39(1), 67–78.
• Jensen, P. H., & Webster, E. (2009). Another look at the relationship between innovation proxies. Australian Economic Papers, 48(3), 252–269.
• Kearney. (2020). The tipping point for European high-tech: Catch up or lose out. Kearney.
• Khan, K., Su, C.-W., Umar, M., & Zhang, W. (2022). Geopolitics of technology: A new battleground? Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(2), 442–462. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.16028
• Kleinknecht, A., Van Montfort, K., & Brouwer, E. (2002). The non-trivial choice among innovation indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11(2), 109–121, 2002.
• Klomp, L., Van Leeuwen, & George. (2001). Linking innovation and firm performance: A new approach. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(3), 343–364.
• von Laer, M., Blind, K., & Ramel, F. (2021). Standard essential patents and global ICT value chains with a focus on the catching-up of China. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102110. Telecommunications Policy 46/2.
• March, C., & Schieferdecker, I. (2021). Technological sovereignty as ability, not autarky, CESifo working papers, 9139. Munic: CESifo. Online: https://www.ce-sifo. org/en/publikationen/2021/working-paper/technological-sovereignty-ability-not-autarky.
• Mendonça, S., Dam ́asio, B., Charlita de Freitas, L., Oliveira, L., Cichy, M., & Nicita, A. (2022). The rise of 5G technologies and systems: A quantitative analysis of knowledge production. Telecommunications Policy, 46.
• Miroudot, S. (2020). Resilience versus robustness in global value chains: Some policy implications. Vox EU. Jun 2020 https://voxeu.org/ accessed 23 Jul 2021.
• Mohnen, P., & Hall, B. (2013). Innovation and productivity: An update. Eurasian Business Review, 3(Issue 1), 47–65.
• OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD.
• OECD. (2019). The road to 5G networks. Experience to date and future developments. In OECD digital economy papers No. 284. Paris: OECD. Parcu, P. L., Innocenti, N., & Carrozza, C. (2021). Ubiquitous technologies and 5G development. Who is leading the race? Telecommunications policy, 46/4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102277
• Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1995). Patterns of technological activity: Their measurement and interpretation. In P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change (pp. 14–51). Oxford: Blackwell.
• Petricevic, O., & Teece, D. J. (2019). The structural reshaping of globalization: Implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 50/9, 1487–1512.
• Pohlmann, T., Blind, K., & HeB, P. (2020). Fact finding study on patents declared to the 5G standard. In Report on behalf of the federal ministry for economic affairs and energy.
• Pohlmann, T., & Buggenhagen, M. (2021). Who leads the 5G patent race. https://www.iplytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/IPlytics-November-2021-Who- leads-the-5G-patent-race.pdf.
• Robles-Carrillo, M. (2021). European Union policy on 5G: Context, scope and limits. Telecommunications Policy, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102216
• Rühlig, T., Seaman, J., & Voelsen, D. (2019). 5G and the U.S.-China tech rivalry-a test for Europe’s future in the digital age: How can Europe shift back from back foot to front foot? External Publications.
• Schaefer, K. J. (2020). Catching up by hiring: The case of Huawei. Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 1500–1515. Schmidt, E., & Graversen, E. (2017). Persistent factors facilitate excellence in research environments. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0142-0
• Shapiro, C. (2006). Prior user rights. The American Economic Review, 96(2), 92–96.
• Taga, K., Uferer, C., & McInroy, C. (2021). 5G supply market trends: Baseline scenario report.
• Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47/8, 1367–1387.
• Teece, D. J. (2021). Technological leadership and 5G patent portfolios: Guiding strategic policy and licensing decisions. California Management Review, 63, 5–34.
• Teubner, L., Henkel, J., & Bekkers, R. (2021). Industry consortia in mobile telecommunications standards setting: Purpose, organization and diversity.
• Telecommunications Policy, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102059
• Tijssen, R. J. W., & Winnink, J. J. (2018). Capturing ’R&D excellence’: Indicators, international statistics, and innovative universities. Scientometrics, 114(2), 687–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2602-9
• VDE. (2021). Technological sovereignty: Methodology and recommendations. In Klaus illgner. Germany: VDE Association for Electrical Electronic and Information Technologies. A. da Ponte et al.