La indeterminación del concepto de arte en la sociedad

Abstract

Any way of expression uses creative activity and is also deeply influenced by innovation. In the dates when the death of aesthetics existed, only one art was present making no difference at all in the quality among them. This is, we cannot consider nor the work of art that covers all linguistics structure (intellectual art) all along as the most aesthetics one or the art that results from human desires or reflections (emotional art). Even though one searches for something different in order to stand out, the originality as a result of new and different things is no longer linked to the artistic quality. Nowadays, however, innovation is the obsession for the unusual aesthetic manner but far away from that that wonders about structural elements of the artistic expression. This switch in definition expects to work only with the pure particularity that each human being possesses. Therefore, the most specific artistic fact is the material transformation from a work of art into a concept that sees past the coherence between the content and the expression. This creates the standards of an eclectic and aesthetic creativity (which is filled with intelligible links well established in the ordinary public) out of an pure originality. Last, in a world of art with very few artistic surprises, the best known work of arts are presented as paradigmatic symbols, far from those less well-known work of arts defined by the range of contexts where they are developed.