Riesgo de aparición del efecto boomerang en las comunicaciones contra la violencia

  1. Ruiz San Román, José A.
  2. Brändle, Gaspar
  3. Martín Cárdaba, Miguel Ángel
Journal:
Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación

ISSN: 1134-3478

Year of publication: 2011

Issue Title: La Universidad Red y en Red

Issue: 37

Pages: 161-168

Type: Article

DOI: 10.3916/C37-2011-03-08 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación

Abstract

Violent behaviors cause concern among people, policy makers, politicians, educators, social workers, parents associations, etc. From different fields and perspectives, measures are taken to try to solve the problem of violence. Institutional communication campaigns against violence and the publication of news related to violent events are often some of the actions used by policy makers. But some of the literature and data have shown that its effectiveness is not always exactly as expected. And even some anti-violence messages, can have the opposite effect and reinforce the attitudes of those who thought that violence is necessary. The hypothesis is that most people assume with no problem the core message of anti-violence campaigns. But, and this is the key issue and most problematic, individuals who are more likely to be violent (precisely those who should address such communications) could react to anti-violence message in a violent way. There is a tragic paradox: the anti-violence message could increase the predisposition to violent behavior. This would be a case of what some literature called boomerang effect. This article highlights the need for detailed empirical studies on certain effects of media (desensitization, imitation, accessibility and reactance), which could help explain the emergence of the boomerang effect.

Bibliographic References

  • American Academy of Pediatrics (2009). Pediatrics. (www.pediatrics.org) (15-12-2010).
  • Anderson, C.A. & Bushman, B. J. (2002). The Effects of Media Violence on Society. Science, 295; 2.377-2.378.
  • Anderson, C.A. & Dill, K.E. (2000). Video Games and Aggressive Thoughts, Feelings, and Behavior in the La-boratory and in Life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4; 772-790.
  • Anderson, C.A.; Berkowitz, L. & al. (2003). The Influence of Media Violence on Youth. American Psychological Society, 4(3); 81-110.
  • Anderson, C.A. (1997). Effects of Violent Movies and Trait Hostility on Hostile Feelings and Aggressive Thoughts. Aggressive Behavior, 23; 161-178.
  • Bandura, A., Ross, S. & Ross, S. A. (1963b). Vicarious Reinforcement and Imitative Learning. Journal of Ab-normal and Social Psychology, 67(6); 601-607.
  • Bandura, A., Ross, S. & Ross, S.A. (1961). Transmission of Aggression through Imitation of Aggressive Models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3); 575-582.
  • Bandura, A.; Ross, S. & Ross, S.A. (1963a). Imitation of Film-mediated Aggressive Models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(1); 3-11.
  • Barrios Cachazo, C. (2005). La violencia audiovisual y sus efectos evolutivos: un estudio teórico y empírico.
  • Brändle, G.; Martín Cárdaba, M.A. & Ruiz San Román, J.A. (2009). El riesgo de efectos no queridos en cam-pañas de comunicación contra la violencia. Discusión de una hipótesis de trabajo, en Nova, P.; Del Pino, J. (Eds.). Sociedad y tecnología: ¿qué futuro nos espera? Madrid: Asociación Madrileña de Sociología; 191-198.
  • Brehm, J.W (1966). A Theory of Psychological Reactance. New York: Academic Press.
  • Brehm, S.S. & Brehm, J.W. (1981). Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. Academic Press: New York.
  • Breznitz, S. (1984). Cry Wolf: The Psychology of False Alarms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
  • Bushman, B.J. & Stack, A.D. (1996). Forbidden fruit versus tainted fruit: effects of warnings labels on attraction to television violence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2; 207-226.
  • Carnagey, N.L.; Anderson, C.A. & Bushman, B.J. (2007). The Effect of Videogame Violence on Psychological Desensitization to Real-life Violence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43; 489-496.
  • Cialdini, R.B.; Demaine, L.J. & al. (2006). Managing Social Norms for Persuasive Impact. Social Influence, 1; 3-15.
  • Cialdini, R.B. (2003). Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment. Current Directions in Psycho-logical Science, 12; 105-109.
  • Cohen, D. (1998). La violencia en los programas televisivos. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 6. (www.ull.es/publicaciones/latina/a/81coh.htm) (12-11-2010).
  • Comunicar: Revista científica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación, 25.
  • Drabman, R.S. & Thomas, M.H. (1974). Does Media Violence Increase Children’s Toleration of Real-life Ag-gression? Developmental Psychology, 10(3); 418-421.
  • Drabman, R.S. & Thomas, M.H. (1976). Does Watching Violence on Television Cause Apathy? Pediatrics, 57(3); 329-331.
  • Feingold, P.C. & Knapp, M.L. (1977). Antidrug Abuse Commercials. Journal of Communications, 27; 20-28.
  • Fernández Villanueva, C.; Revilla Castro. J.C. & al. (2008). Los espectadores ante la violencia televisiva: fun-ciones, efectos e interpretaciones situadas. Comunicación y Sociedad, 2; 85-113.
  • García Galera, M.C. (Dir.) (2008). La telefonía móvil en la infancia y la adolescencia. Informe del Defensor del Menor, Madrid: CAM.
  • Gentile, D.A.; Lynch, P.J. & al. (2004). The Effects of Violent Videogame Habits on Adolescent Hostility, Ag-gressive Behaviors, and School Performance. Journal of Adolescence, 27; 5-22.
  • Hornik, R.; Jacobson, L. & al. (2008). Effects of the National Youth Anti-drug Media Campaign on Youths. American Journal of Public Health, 98 (12); 2.229-2.236.
  • Huesmann, L.R. & Moise, J. (1996). Media Violence: a Demonstrated Public Health Threat to Children. Harward Mental Health Letter, 12 (12); 5-8.
  • Huesmann, L.R. & Taylor, L.D. (2006). The Role of Media Violence in Violent Behavior. Annual Review of Public Health, 27(1); 393-415.
  • Huesmann, L.R.; Moise-Titus, J. & al. (2003). Longitudinal Relations between Children’s Exposure to TV Violence and their Aggressive and Violent Behavior in Young Adulthood: 1977-1992. Developmental Psychology, 39; 201-221.
  • Hyland, M. & Birrell, J. (1979). Government Health Warnings and the Boomerang Effect. Psychological Reports, 44; 643-647.
  • Igartua, J.J.; Cheng, L. & al. (2001). Hacia la construcción de un índice de violencia desde el análisis agregado de la programación. Zer. Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 10; 59-79.
  • McQuail, D. (1991). Introducción a la teoría de la comunicación de masas. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Miller, C.H.; Burgoon, M. & al. (2006). Identifying Principal Risk Factors for the Initiation of Adolescent Smoking Behaviors: The Significance of Psychological Reactance. Health Communication, 19; 241-252
  • Miller, C.H.; Lane, L.T. & al. (2007). Psychological Reactance and Promotional Health Messages: The Effects of Controlling Language, Lexical Concreteness, and the Restoration of Freedom. Human Communication Research, 33; 219-240.
  • Molitor, F. & Hirsch, K.W. (1994). Children’s Toleration of Real-life Aggression after Exposure to Media Vi-olence: a Replication of the Drabman and Thomas Studies. Child Study Journal, 24 (3); 191-208.
  • Ringold, D.J. (2002). Boomerang Effect: In Response to Public Health Interventions: Some Unintended Con-sequences in the Alcoholic Beverage Market. Journal of Consumer Policy, 25; 27-63.
  • Robinson, T.N. & Killen, J.D. (1997). Do Cigarette Warnings Labels Reduce Smoking? Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 151; 267-272.
  • Stewart, D.W. & Martin, I.M. (1994). Intended and Unintended Consequences of Warning Messages: A Review and Synthesis of Empirical Research. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 13; 1-19.
  • Thomas, H.M.; Horton, R. & al. (1977). Desensitization to Portrayals of Real-life Aggression as a Function of Exposure to Television Violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(6); 450-458.
  • Twerski, A.D.; Weinstein, A.S. & al. (1976). The Use and Abuse of Warnings in Products Li-ability: Design Defect Litigation Comes of Age. Cornell Law Review, 61; 495.
  • Unger, J.B.; Rohrbach, L.A. & al. (1999). Attitudes toward Anti-tobacco Policy among California Youth: Asso-ciations with Smoking Status, Psychological Variables and Advocacy Actions. Health Educations Research Theory and Practice, 14; 751-763.
  • Vives, C.; Torrubiano, J. & Álvarez, C. (2009). The Effect of Television News Items on Intimate Partner Violence Murders. European Journal of Public Health; 1-5.
  • Wegner, D.M. (1994). Ironic Processes of Mental Control. Psychological Review, 10; 34-52.
  • Wolf, M. (1994). Los efectos sociales de los media. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Worchel, S. & Arnold, S.E. (1973). The Effects of Censorship and the Attractiveness of the Censor on Attitude Change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9; 365-377.
Data source: Dialnet