User experience and interaction design in creative processes and educational sciences with virtual and augmented reality technologies. A research with quantitative and qualitative methods

  1. RUBIO-TAMAYO, Jose Luis 1
  2. GERTRUDIX BARRIO, Manuel 1
  3. GARCÍA GARCÍA, Francisco 2
  1. 1 Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
    info

    Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01v5cv687

  2. 2 UCM
Revue:
Enseñanza & Teaching: Revista interuniversitaria de didáctica

ISSN: 2386-3927,  2386-3927

Année de publication: 2018

Volumen: 36

Número: 1

Pages: 63-79

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14201/ET2183616379 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Enseñanza & Teaching: Revista interuniversitaria de didáctica

Résumé

Virtual, augmented or mixed reality, are nowadays part of a new emerging generation of information and communication technologies. Their influence, since the 80’s and the 90’s in fields such as education, creative processes and research, has been shown in many studies since then. Those technologies have also a relevant potential to have an influence in current approaches in information and communication sciences. Thus, factors such as immersive experiences, simulation or interactivity, should be kept in mind in order to design experiences which can help us to understand the relationship between user, information, devices and environments. This manuscript shows a research based in both quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative research methods include surveys based on factors such as interactions design principles, usability heuristics or technology acceptance models, among others. Qualitative ones include grounded theory and specifications such as ims ld. Results shows how those technologies have dramatically influenced in creative processes and users’ relationship with technology, peers and virtual and physical environments. 

Références bibliographiques

  • Agarwal, R. & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information systems research, 9 (2), 204-215.
  • Anderson, T. & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational Researcher, 41 (1), 16-25.
  • Arduino. Accessed on 2017-08-12. https://www.arduino.cc/.
  • Bakioglu, B. S. (2015). Alternate Reality Games. The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society, 1-7.
  • Biocca, F. (1996). Intelligence augmentation: The vision inside virtual reality. Advances in psychology, 113, 59-75.
  • Bowman, D. A. & McMahan, R. P. (2007). Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough? Computer, 40 (7).
  • Burgos, D. & Koper, R. (2014). Comunidades virtuales, grupos y proyectos de investigación sobre ims Learning Design. Status quo, factores clave y retos inmedia. relieve-Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 11 (2).
  • Castaño-Garrido, C.; Maiz-Olazabalaga, I. y Garay Ruiz, U. (2015). Diseño, motivación y rendimiento en un curso mooc cooperativo. Revista Comunicar, 44, 19-26.
  • Caudell, T. P. & Mizell, D. W. (1992, January). Augmented reality: An application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. In System Sciences, 1992. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on (vol. 2, pp. 659-669). ieee.
  • Chang, Y. S. & Liu, J. (2013). Applyng an ar Technique to enhance Situated Heritage Learning in a Ubiquitous Learning Environment. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12 (3), 21-32.
  • Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. mis Quarterly, 13 (3), 319-340.
  • Eyewriter Project. Accessed on 2017-07-02. http://www.eyewriter.org/.
  • Frangou, S.; Papanikolaou, K.; Aravecchia, L.; Montel, L.; Ionita, S.; Arlegui, J. & Pagello, I. (2008). Representative examples of implementing educational robotics in school based on the constructivist approach. In Workshop Proceedings of simpar 2008 (pp. 54-65). Venice, Italy.
  • Gértrudix Barrio, F. & Gértrudix Barrio, M. (2012). La música en los entornos inmersivos. Estudio sobre los espacios de representación. Revista Comunicar, 38.
  • González Aspera, A. L. & Chávez Hernández, G. (2011). La realidad virtual inmersiva en ambientes inteligentes de aprendizaje. Un caso en la educación superior. Icono14, 9 (2), 122-137.
  • Gregg, L. & Tarrier, N. (2007). Virtual reality in mental health. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00127-007-0173-4.
  • Guimarães Jr., C. S. S.; Rubio-Tamayo, J. L. & Henriques, R. V. B. (2014). Robótica para los procesos de Enseñanza de la Disciplina Mecatrónica: Desarrollo del Prototipo Edubot V-2. In III Congreso Internacional Sociedad Digital. Madrid: Icono 14.
  • Harrell, F. (2013). Phantasmal Media. An Approach to Imagination, Computation, and Expression. The mit Press. November 2013. isbn: 9780262019330.
  • Hughes, D.; Smith, E.; Shumaker, R. & Hughes, E. (2009). Virtual Reality for Accessibility. In Universal Access Handbook (pp. 1-10). crc Press.
  • ims Global Learning Consortium. (2003). ims learning design specification. 2008206225. http://www. imsglobal. org/le2 arningdesign.
  • ims Global Learning Consortium. (2014). Inc. «ims Learning Design Version 1.0 Final Specification».
  • Kohler, T.; Fueller, J.; Matzler, K.; Stieger, D. & Füller, J. (2011). Co-creation in virtual worlds: The design of the user experience. mis quarterly, 773-788.
  • Kozak, J. J.; Hancock, P. A.; Arthur, E. J. & Chrysler, S. T. (1993). Transfer of training from virtual reality. Ergonomics, 36 (7), 777-784.
  • Lanier, J. (1992). Virtual reality: The promise of the future. Interactive Learning International, 8 (4), 275-79.
  • Lanier, J. & Biocca, F. (1992). An insider’s view of the future of virtual reality. Journal of communication, 42 (4), 150-172.
  • McLuhan, M. (1967). The Medium is the Message: An Inventory of Effects. Random House.
  • Meyer, K. (1995). Dramatic Narrative in Virtual Reality. In Communication in Age of Virtual Reality. Routledge.
  • Mishra, D.; Akman, I. & Mishra, A. (2014). Theory of reasoned action application for green information technology acceptance. Computers in human behavior, 36, 29-40.
  • Milgram, P. & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. ieice transactions on Information and Systems, 77 (12), 1321-1329.
  • Riva, G.; Mantovani, F.; Capideville, C. S.; Preziosa, A.; Morganti, F.; Villani, D. & Alcañiz, M. (2007). Affective interactions using virtual reality: the link between presence and emotions. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10 (1), 45-56.
  • Ruiz Torres, D. (2011). Realidad Aumentada, educación y museos. Icono14, 9 (2), 212-226
  • Ryan, M. L. (2001). Narrative as virtual reality: Immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Satava, R. M. (1992). Robotics, telepresence and virtual reality. Minimally Invasive Therapy, 1 (6), 357-363.
  • Sherman, W. R. & Craig, A. B. (2002). Understanding virtual reality: Interface, application, and design. Elsevier.
  • Streitz, N. A.: Geißler, J.; Holmer, T.; Konomi, S. I.; Müller-Tomfelde, C.; Reischl, W. & Steinmetz, R. (1999, May). i-land: an interactive landscape for creativity and innovation. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 120-127). acm.
  • Thorsteinsson, G. & Page, T. (2007). Creativity In Technology Education Facilitated Through Virtual Reality Learning Environments A Case Study. i-Manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 3 (4), 74.
  • Venkatesh, V.; Brown, S. A. & Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS quarterly, 37 (1).
  • Virtalis: Immersive Experience for Work Collaboration. Acessed on 2017-06-12. http://www.virtalis.com/.
  • Yengin, D. (2011). Digital Game as a New Media and Use of Digital Game in Education. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 1 (1), 20-25.
  • Zyda, M. (2005). From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer, 38 (9), 25-32.
La source de données: Dialnet