El problema de la modularidad en el procesamiento auditivo y en el proceso del habla

  1. López Bascuas, Luis Enrique
Revue:
Taula: Quaderns de pensament

ISSN: 0214-6657

Année de publication: 1992

Número: 15

Pages: 83-92

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openIbdigital editor

D'autres publications dans: Taula: Quaderns de pensament

Résumé

In this work relevant experiments are commented concerning the existence of a speech module. The paper is not intended to provide un exhaustive review of the evidence. Instead, it tries to develop a coherent line of argument that muy lead to some relevant conclusions in order to ser the debate in proper terms.

Références bibliographiques

  • DIEHL, R.L. (1987). Auditory Constraints on Speech Perception. En M.E.H. SCHOUTEN (Ed.), The Psychophysics of Speech Perception. Martinus Nijhoff.
  • FAHEY, R.P., LOPEZ-BASCUAS, L.E., GARCIA-ALBEA, J.E. & ROSNER, B.S. (en preparación). Temporal lag perception in Spanish and English speakers.
  • FODOR, J.A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • HIRSH, 1. (1959). Auditory perception of temporal order. JASA, 31. 759-766.
  • KEWLEY-PORT, D., WATSON, CH. & FOYLED. (1988). Auditory temporalacuity inrelation to category boundanes: speech and nonspeech stimuli. JASA, 83 (3). 1133-1 145.
  • KLATT, D. (1980). Software for a cascade-parallel formant synthesizer. JASA. 67, 971-995.
  • LIBERMAN, A.M., HARRIS, K.S., HOFFMAN, H.S. & GRIFFITH, B.C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 358-368.
  • LIBERMAN, A.M., HARRIS, K.S., KINNEY, J.A. & LANE, H. (1961). The discrimination of relative onset times of the components of certain speech and nonspeech patterns. Journal of Esperimerztal Ps);chology, 6 1. 379-388.
  • LIBERMAN, A.M. & MATTINGLY, I.G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cogrzition, 21, 1-36.
  • LISKER, L. & ABRAiMSON, A. (1970). The voicing dimension: someexperiments in comparative phonetics. Proceedings of the Sixth Intemational Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Prague, 563- 567.
  • MARR. D. (1982). Vision. Freeman.
  • MILLER, J.D., WIER, C., PASTORE, R. KELLY, W. y DOOLING, R. (1976). Discrimination and labeling of noise-buzz sequences with varying NLT: an example of categoncal perception. JASA, 60,410-417.
  • PISONI, D.B. (1977). Identification and discrimination of the relative onset times of two component tones: implications for voicing perception in stops. JASA, 61, 1352-1361.
  • REPP, B.H. & LIBERMAN, A.M. (1987). Phonetic category boundaries are flexible. En S. HARNAD (Ed.). Categorical Perception. Cambndge, U.P.
  • ROSEN, S. & HOWELL, P. (1987). 1s there a natural sensitivity at 20 ms. in relative tone-onsettime continua? A reanalysis of Hirsh's (1959) data. En M.E.H. SCHOUTEN (Ed.) The Psychophysics of speech perception. Martinus Nijhoff.
  • ROSNER, B.S. (en preparación). Thurstonian models for changes in perceptual performance.
  • SACHS, R.M. & GRANT, K.W. (1976). Stimulus correlates in theperception of voice onset time (VOT): 11 Discrimination of speech with high and low stimulus uncertainty. JASA. Supplement 1, 60, S91.
  • SUMMERFIELD, Q. (1982). Differences between spectral dependencies in auditory and phonetic temporal processing: relevance to the perception of voicing in initial stops. JASA. 72, 51-61.
  • WILLIAMS, L. (1977). The voicing contrast in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 5, 169-184.
La source de données: Dialnet