La encuesta como interacción socialuna aproximación empírica

  1. Noya Miranda, Francisco Javier
  2. Atienza Aledo, Julián
Aldizkaria:
Empiria: Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales

ISSN: 1139-5737

Argitalpen urtea: 1999

Zenbakia: 2

Orrialdeak: 73-92

Mota: Artikulua

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Empiria: Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales

Laburpena

In the reactivity hypothesis the idea is posed that interection between the interviewer and the interviewed in surveys inpinches upon the answers given by the latter. In order to test this hypothesis, reciprocal views of the interviewer and the interviewed must be known. Information about them can be obtained from a second survey, a survey on the survey. In it, the interviewer is asked about hte interviewed, and viceversa. In this paper, results produced in Spain with this methodology are presented and compared to those obtained in Germany with an identical design.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • ALVIRA, F./MARTÍNEZ, E. (1985): «El efecto de los entrevistadores sobre las respuestas a los entrevistados». Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 29: 219-256.
  • BRIGGS, C. (1989): Leaming How to Ask. A Sociolinguistic Appraisal ofthe Role ofthe Interview in Social Science Research, Cambrige U.P., Cambridge.
  • DijKSTRA, W. (1987): 'Interviewing style and respondent behaviour', Sociological Methods and Research, 16(2): 309-334.
  • EsBENSEN, R/MENARD, S. (1991): «Interviewer-related measurement error in attitudinal research», Quality á Quantity, 25(1): 151-165.
  • EssER, H. (1975): Soziale Regelmdssigkeiten des Befragtenverhaltens, Hain, Meisenheim am Glan.
  • EssER, H (1986): 'Kónnen Befragte lügen? Zum Konzept des 'wahren Wertes' im Rahmen der handlungstheoretischen Erklárung von Situationseinflüssen bei der Befragung', Kdlner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 38 (2): 314-336.
  • EssER, H (1993): 'Response set: habit, frame or rational choice', en D. Krebs/ P. Schmidt (Eds.): New Directions in Attitude Measurement, De Gruyter, Berlín/ New York, pp. 293-313.
  • GARCÍA FERRANDO, M./GARCÍA, M . (1976): 'Las encuestas a encuesta'. Revista Española de Opinión Pública, 45, 266-292.
  • GoYDER, J. (1987): The Silent Minority. Nonrespondents on Sample Surveys, Polity Press, Oxford.
  • HARTMANN, P. (1991): Wunsch und Wirklichkeit. Theorie undEmpirie soziales Erwünschheit, Deutscher -UniversitatsVerlag, Vieweg.
  • JAGODZINSSKI, W./KÜHNEL, S./ScHMiDT, P. (1987): 'Is there a socratic effect in nonexperimental panel studies?', Sociological Methods and Research, 15(3): 415-443.
  • JusTEL, M. (1981): 'Las encuestas a encuesta, de nuevo'. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 13: 155-181.
  • MiSHLER, E. (1986): Research Interviewing. Context and Narrative, Harvard UP, Cambridge.
  • NoYA, J. (1998): Los efectos de contexto en el cuestionario, Depto. Sociología II (UNED), trabajo inédito.
  • PAWSON, R. (1996): 'Theorizing the interview', British Journal of Sociology, Al.
  • PROCTER, I./PADFIELD, M . (1998): 'The effect of the interview on the interviewee'. Social Research Methodology, 1(2): 123-136.
  • REINECKE, J. (1991): Interviewerund Befragtenverhalten. Theoretische Ansatze undmethodische Konzepte, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.
  • REINECKE, J./SCHMIDT, R (1993): 'Explaining interviewer effects and respondent behavior: theoretical models and empirical analysis', Quality & Quantity, 27 (2): 219-247.
  • ScHOLL, A. (1993): Die Befragung ais Kommunikationsituation. Zar Reaktivitat im Forschungsinterview, Wesdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.
  • STEINERT, M . (1984): 'Das Interview ais soziale Interaktion', en M. Meulemann/ K. Reuband (Hrsg.): Soziale Realitat im Interview, Campus, Frankfurt, pp. 17-59.