Sobre la arquitectura modular del sistema auditivo humano

  1. López Bascuas, Luis Enrique
Revista:
Anuario de psicología

ISSN: 0066-5126

Año de publicación: 2003

Volumen: 34

Número: 4

Páginas: 536-546

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Anuario de psicología

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bruner, J. (1973). On perceptual readiness. En J. Anglin (Ed.), Beyond the information given. New York: W.W. Nortonn & Co.
  • Cosmides, L. y Tooby, J. (1994). Origins of domain specificity: The evolution of functional organization. En L. Hirschfeld y S. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, Mass.: Bradford Books, MIT Press.
  • Fodor, J. (2000). The mind doesn't work that way. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Knudsen, E. I. (1988). Experience shapes sound localization and auditory unit properties during development in the barn owl. En G.M. Edelman, W. E. Gall & W. M. Cowan (Eds.), Auditory function: Neurobiological bases of hearing. New York: Willey.
  • Konishi, M. (1991). Neural mechanisms of binaural fusion. En I. G. Mattingly & M. S. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception. Hillsdale, N.J.: LEA.
  • Liberman, A. M. & Mattingly, I. G. (1989). A specialization for speech perception. Science, 243, 489-494.
  • Liberman, A. M. & Mattingly, I. G. (1991). Modularity and the effects of experience. En R. R. Hoffman & D.S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes. Vol. 3: Applied and ecological perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ.: LEA.
  • López-Bascuas, L. E. (1995). Speech and nonspeech signal densities for the perception of temporal order. Proceedings Eurospeech '95, 3, pp. 2281-2283.
  • López-Bascuas, L. E. (1996). Speech signals might ignore auditory processors. En W. Ainsworth & S. Greenberg (Eds.), The auditory basis of speech perception. Keele: ESCA.
  • López-Bascuas, L. E., Rosner, B. S. & García-Albea, J. E. (2003). Voicing and temporal order perception by Spanish speakers. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol. 1, pp. 402-406.
  • Mattingly, I. G. & Liberman, A. M. (1985). Verticality unparalleled. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 24-26.
  • Mattingly, I. G. & Liberman, A. M. (1988). Specialized perceiving systems for speech and other biologically significant sounds. En G. M. Edelman, W. E. Gall & W. M. Cowan (Eds.), Auditory function: Neurobiological bases of hearing. New York: Willey.
  • Mattingly, I. G. & Liberman, A. M. (1990). Speech and other auditory modules. En G. M. Edelman, W. E. Gall & W. M. Cowan (Eds.), Signal and sense: Global and local order in perceptual maps. New York: Willey.
  • McGurk, H. & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
  • Miyawaki, K., Strange, W., Verbrugge, R., Liberman, A. M., Jenkins, J. J. & Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception and Psychophysics, 18, 331-340.
  • Piatelli-Palmarini, M. (1989). Evolution, selection and cognition: From learning to parameter setting in biology and in the study of language. Cognition, 31, 1-44.
  • Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
  • Plotkin, H. (1997). Evolution in mind. London: Alan Lane.
  • Suga, N. (1984). The extent to which bisonar information is represented in the bat auditory cortex. En G. M. Edelman, W. E. Gall & W. M. Cowan (Eds.), Dynamic aspects of neocortical function. New York:Willey.
  • Whalen, D. H. & Liberman, A. M. (1987). Speech perception takes precedence over nonspeech. Science, 237, 169-171.