Analisis de la variable género en las escalas del EDTC mediante técnicas de funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aluja, A. (1991). Personalidad desinhibida, agresividad y conducta antisocial. Barcelona: Promociones y Publicaciones Universitarias.
• Barratt, E.S. (1985). Impulsiveness subtraits: arousal and information processing. En J.T. Spence y C.E. Itard (eds.): Motivation, emotion and personality. North Holland: Elsevier.
• Colom, R. y Jayme Zaro, M.J. (2004). La Psicología de las diferencias de sexo. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
• Dorans, N.J. y Kulick, E. (1986). Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the SAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, 355-368.
• Eysenck, H.J. y Eysenck, S.B.G. (1997). Cuestionario revisado de personalidad de Eysenck (EPQ-R). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
• Gray, J.A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
• Hambleton, R.K. y Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
• Hare, R.D. (1993). Without conscience: the disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. Nueva York: Simon & Schuster.
• Hare, R.D. (2001). Psychopaths and their nature: some implications for understanding human predatory violence. En A. Raine y J. Sanmartin (eds.): Violence and Psychopathy (pp. 5-34). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
• Herrero, O., Ordóñez, F., Salas, A. y Colom, R. (2002). Adolescencia y comportamiento antisocial. Psicothema, 14 (2),340-343.
• Jodoin, M.G. y Gierl, M.J. (2001). Evaluating type I error and power rates using an effect size measure with the logistic regresión procedure for DIF detection. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 329-349.
• Lord, F.M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
• Lykken, D.T. (1995). The antisocial personalities. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
• Pérez, J. y Torrubia, R. (1986). Fiabilidad y validez de la versión española de la escala de búsqueda de sensaciones (Forma V). Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 18 (1), 7-22.
• Raju, N.S., van der Linden, W.J. y Fleer, P.J. (1995). IRT-based internal measures of differential functioning of items and tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19 (4), 353-368.
• Swaminathan, H. y Rogers, H.J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27 (4), 361-370.
• Thissen, D. (1991). MULTILOG: multiple, categorial item analysis and tests scoring using item response theory. Chicago: Scientific Software, Inc.
• Waller, N. (1998). LINKDIF: an S-PLUS routine for linking item parameter and calculating IRT measures of differential functioning of items and tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22 (4), 392.
• William Stout Institute for Measurement (1990). Dimensionality-Based DIF/DBF Package: SIBTEST, POLYSIBTEST, CROSSING SIBTEST, DIFSIM, DIFCOMP. IRT-Based Educational and Psychological Measurement Software.
• Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
• Zumbo, B.D. y Thomas, D.R. (1997). A measure of effect size for a model-based approach for studying DIF. Edgeworth Laboratory for Quantitative Behavioral Science, University of Northern British Columbia: Prince George, B. C.