Las intenciones de implementaciónuna mirada atrás a quince años de progreso

  1. Schweiger Gallo, Inge
  2. Gollwitzer, Peter M.
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 2007

Volumen: 19

Número: 1

Páginas: 37-42

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Resumen

Las intenciones de implementación: una mirada atrás a quince años de progreso. Las intenciones de implementación son planes si-entonces (if-then plans) que especifican cuándo, dónde y cómo se va a llevar a la acción una meta propuesta: (Si me encuentro con la situación x, entonces llevaré a cabo la conducta y!, ligando de esta manera una situación crítica con una conducta dirigida a la meta. Durante los últimos quince años, las intenciones de implementación han resultado ser estrategias eficaces de autorregulación, en comparación con las metas simples, para promover comportamientos deseados o cuando hay que realizar acciones no placenteras. Mediante la formación de intenciones de implementación también se pueden controlar las influencias indeseadas (por ejemplo, tentaciones, malos hábitos, estados personales adversos). Asimismo, han demostrado facilitar las acciones encaminadas hacia una meta en poblaciones críticas, como pacientes con lesiones cerebrales frontales, esquizofrénicos, y pacientes bajo el síndrome de abstinencia, para quienes los problemas de iniciación de acciones dirigidas hacia una meta son más acentuados.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2000). Habits as knowledge structures: Au-tomaticity in goal-directed behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78,53-63.
  • Achtziger, A. (2003). Kognitionspsychologische Aspekte der willentlichen Stereotypkontrolle (Cognitive-psychological aspects of the volitional stereotype control). Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Konstanz, Germany.
  • Ajzen, I., & Madden, T.J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experi-mental Social Psychology, 22,453-474.
  • Álvarez Castillo, J.L. (2005). Las metas en la reducción del prejuicio automático. Psicothema, 17,71-75.
  • Armitage, C.J. (2004). Evidence that implementation intentions reduce dietary fat intake: A randomized trial. Health Psychology, 23,319- 323.
  • Bamberg, S. (2000). The promotion of new behavior by forming an implementation intention: Results of a field experiment in the domain of travel mode choice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30,1903-1922.
  • Baumeister, R.F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D.M. (1998). Egodepletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252-1265.
  • Bayer, U.C., Moskowitz, G.B., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (2005). Implementation intentions and action initiation without conscious intent. Unpublished manuscript, University of Konstanz, Germany.
  • Brandstätter, V., Heimbeck, D., Malzacher, J.T., & Frese, M. (2003). Goalsneed implementation intentions: The model of action phases tested in the applied setting of continuing education. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 37-59.
  • Brandstätter, V., Lengfelder, A., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (2001). Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81,946-960.
  • Gawrilow, C., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (2005).Implementation intentions leadto goal-directed behavior in ADHD children. Unpublished manuscript. University of Konstanz, Germany.
  • Gollwitzer, P.M. (1993). Goal achievement: The role of intentions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4,141-185.
  • Gollwitzer, P.M. (1996). The volitional benefits of planning. In P.M. Goll-witzer & J.A. Bargh (eds.): The psychology of action. Linking cognitionand motivation to behavior (pp. 287-312). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Gollwitzer, P.M. (1999). Implementation intentions. Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54,493-503.
  • Gollwitzer, P.M., & Bayer, U.C. (2000). Becoming a better person without changing the self. Paper presented at the Self and Identity Pre-conference of the Annual Meeting of the Society of Experimental Social Psychology, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Gollwitzer, P.M., Bayer, U.C., & Mc Culloch, K.C. (2005). The control of the unwanted. In J.A. Bargh, J. Uleman, & R. Hassin (eds.): Unintended thought (vol. 2, pp. 485-515), New York: Guilford Press.
  • Gollwitzer, P.M., & Brandstätter, V. (1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,73,186-199.
  • Gollwitzer, P.M., Fujita, K., & Oettingen, G. (2004). Planning and the implementation of goals. In R.F. Baumeister & K.D. Vohs (eds.): Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory and application(pp. 211-228). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Gollwitzer, P.M., Heckhausen, H., & Ratajczak, H. (1990). From weighing to willing: Approaching a change decision through pre-or postdecisional mentation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45,41-65.
  • Gollwitzer, P.M., & Moskowitz, G.B. (1996). Goal effects on action and cognition. In E.T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (eds.): Social psychology. Handbook of basic principles(pp. 361-399). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Gollwitzer, P.M., & Schaal, B. (1998). Metacognition in action: The importance of implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2,124-136.
  • Gollwitzer, P.M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69-119.
  • Jaudas, A., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (2004, April). Führen Vorsätze zu Rigiditätim Zielstreben? [Do implementation intentions lead to rigidity in goal striving?]. Paper presented at the symposium «Recent developments in research on implementation intentions» at the 46th Meeting of Experimental Psychologists, Giessen, Germany.
  • Lengfelder, A., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (2001). Reflective and reflexive actioncontrol in patients with frontal brain lesions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81,80-100.
  • Madden, T.J., Ellen, P.S., & Ajzen, I. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18,3-9.
  • Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (2001). Goal setting and goal striving. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (eds.): Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intraindividual processes (vol. 1, pp. 329-347). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Oettingen, G., Hönig, G., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (2000). Effective self-regulation of goal attainment. International Journal of Educational Research,33,705-732.
  • Orbell, S., Hodgkins, S., & Sheeran, P. (1997). Implementation intentions and the theory of planned behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 945-954.
  • Orbell, S., & Sheeran, P. (2000). Motivational and volitional processes inaction initiation: A field study of the role of implementation intentions.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30,780-797.
  • Patterson, C.J., & Mischel, W. (1976). Effects of temptation-inhibiting and task-facilitating plans on self-control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 209-217.
  • Prestwich, A., Conner, M., Lawton, R., Bailey, W., Litman, J., & Molyneaux, V. (2005). Individual and collaborative implementation intentions and the promotion of breast self-examination. Psychology and Health, 20,743-760.
  • Prestwich, A., Lawton, R., & Conner, M. (2003). The use of implementation intentions and the decision balance sheet in promoting exercise behaviour. Psychology and Health, 18, 707-721.
  • Schweiger Gallo, I., Keil, A., Mc Culloch, K.C., Rockstroh, B., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (2006). Strategic automation of emotion control. Manuscript in preparation.
  • Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (eds.): European Review of Social Psychology (vol. 12, pp. 1-30). New York: Wiley.
  • Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (1999). Implementation intentions and repeatedbehavior: Augmenting the predictive validity of the theory of plannedbehavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 349-369.
  • Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (2000). Using implementation intentions to increase attendance for cervical cancer screening. Health Psychology, 19,283-289.
  • Sheeran, P., & Silvermanm M. (2003). Evaluation of three interventionsto promote work place health and safety: evidence for the utility of implementation intentions. Social Science & Medicine, 56,2153-2163.
  • Steadman, L., & Quine, L. (2004). Encouraging young males to perform testicular self-examination: A simple, but effective, implementation intentions intervention. British Journal of Health Psychology, 9,479-487.
  • Verplanken, B., & Faes, S. (1999). Good intentions, bad habits and affectsof forming implementation intentions on health eating. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29,591-604.
  • Webb, T.L., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Can implementation intentions help to overcome ego-depletion? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,39,279-286.
  • Webb, T.L., & Sheeran, P. (2004). Identifying good opportunities to act:Implementation intentions and cue discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 407-419.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet