"How democratic is the American Constitution?"la actualidad constitucional en EEUU en 2005

Referencias bibliográficas

• Marcos CRIADO y Antonio DE CABO, Whose Voice?: La actualidad constitucional en EEUU en 2004, Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, no. 16, 2005, pp. 419-431.
• Shaden YOUSEF, Military Tribunals: Cure for the Terrorism or a Plague All Their Own?, 42 Houston Law Review, 2005, pp.911 ss.
• Elana J. ZEIDE, In Bed with the Military: First Amendment Implications of Embedded Journalism, 80 New York University Law Review, octubre de 2005, pp. 1309 ss,
• Matthew J. PEED, Blacklisting as a Foreign Policy: The Politics and Law of Listing Terror, 54 Duke Law Journal, 2005, pp. 1321 ss,
• Louis FISHER, Constitutional Dialogues: Interpretation as political process, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1988
• Larry D. KRAMER, The people themselves : popular constitutionalism and judicial review, Oxford, Oxford University press, 2004
• Mark TUSHNET, Taking the Constitution Away From the Courts, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1999; Neal KUMER KAYTAL, Legislative Constitutional Interpretation, 50 Duke Law Review, 2001, pp. 1355 ss.
• Michael STOKES PAULSEN, The Most Dangerous Branch: Executive Power to Say What the Law Is, 83 Georgia Law Review, 1994, pp. 217 ss
• Keith E. WHITTINGTON, Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation: Three Objections and Responses, 80 North Carolina Law Review, 2002, pp. 773 ss.
• Hendrik HERTZBERG, Framed Up: What the Constitution Gets Wrong, New Yorker, 29 de Julio de 2002, p. 85.
• Randy E. BANETT, Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2004.
• Samuel T. Morison, The Crooked Timber of Liberal Democracy, 2005 Michigan State Law Review, Summer, pp. 461-481.
• Marcos CRIADO y Antonio DE CABO, A vueltas con la rama menos peligrosa: La actualidad constitucional en EEUU en 2003, Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, n. 14, 2.o semestre 2004, p. 459.
• Jason T. BURNETTE, Eyes on Their Own Paper: Practical Construction in Constitutional Interpretation, 39 Georgia Law Review, 2005, pp. 1065-1108.
• Michael J. GLENNON, The Use of Custom in Resolving Separation of Powers Disputes, 64 Berkley University Law Review, 1984, pp. 129-134.
• Oren GROS, Chaos and Rules: Should Responses to Violent Crises Always Be Constitutional?, 112 Yale Law Journal, 2003, pp. 1043-1044
• Jules LOBEL, The War on Terrorism and Civil Liberties, 63 University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2002, pp. 769-772.
• Shira A. SCHEINDLIN, Matthew L. SCHWARTZ, With All Due Deference. Judicial Responsibility in a Time of Crisis, 32 Hofstra Law Review, 2004, pp. 795 ss
• Donald A. DOWNS, Erik KIUNNEN, A Response to Anthony Lewis: Civil Liberties in a New Kind of War, 2003 Wisconsin Law Review, pp. 385 ss.
• T. Annio Milone Oratio en su edición italiana Orazione pro Milone, Signorelli, Milán, 1982, p.76.
• Lee EPSTEIN, Daniel E. Ho, Gary KING y Jeffrey A. SEGAL, The Supreme Court During Crisis: How War Affects Only Non War Cases, 80 New York University Law Review, n.1, abril 2005, pp. 9, 49-58 y passim.
• Robert A. DAHL, Comments, 26 Cardozo Law Review, n. 6, 2005, pp. 2541-2548
• Marci A. HAMILTON, Direct Democracy and the Protestant Ethic, 13 Journal of Contemporany Legal Issues, 2004, pp. 411 ss.
• Robert DAHL , The Myth of the Presidential Mandate, 105 Political Science Quaterly, 1990, pp. 355 ss.
• Marcos CRIADO y Antonio DE CABO, La actualidad constitucional en Estados Unidos en 1998, Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, n.3, 1999, pp. 297-298.
• John HART ELY, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory on Judicial Review, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1980. 30 Robert A. DAHL, Comments, cit., p. 2543.
• Michal R. BELKNAP, A Putrid Pedigree: The Bush Administration’s Military Tribunals in Historical Perspective, 38 California Western Law Review, 2002, pp. 433 ss
• Robert DAHL, How democratic is the American Constitution?, New Haven, Yale University Press, 2001, pp. 119 y 154.