Investigación sobre el "Reliance on Accounting Performance Measures" (RAPM) y nuevas tendencia de Control de Gestión.

  1. Lorain, Marie-Anne
Icade: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho

ISSN: 1889-7045

Year of publication: 2008

Issue: 73

Pages: 381-398

Type: Article

More publications in: Icade: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho

Bibliographic References

  • ARGYRIS Chris, 1952. The impact of budgets on people, Controllership foundation, New York.
  • BERLAND Nicolas, 2004. La gestion sans budget: Evaluation de la pertinence des critiques et interprétation théorique, Finance Contrôle et Stratégie, Décembre 2004, pp.37-58.
  • BERLAND Nicolas, 2005. In Bouquin Henri, Les grands auteurs en contrôle de gestion, Les grands auteurs, Editions EMS Management et société, Paris.
  • BRIERS M., HIRST M .K., 1990. The role of budgetary information in performance evaluation, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol.15, pp. 373-398.
  • BROWNELL P., 1982. The role of accounting data in performance evaluation, budgetary participation and organizational effectiveness, Journal of Accounting Research, nº20, pp.12-27.
  • BROWNELL P., 1985. Budgetary systems and the control of functionally differentiated organizational activities, Journal of Accounting Research, nº23, pp.502-512.
  • BROWNELL P., HIRST M., 1986. Reliance on accounting information, budgetary participation and task uncertainty: test of a three way interaction, Journal of Accounting Research, Autumn, pp.241-324.
  • BROWNELL P., DUNK A., 1991. Task uncertainty and its interaction with budgetary participation and budget emphasis: some methodological issues and empirical investigation, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol.16, pp.693-703.
  • BRUNCE P., FRASER R., WOODCOCK L., 1995. Advanced budgeting: a journey to advanced management system, Management Accounting Research, nº6, pp.253-265.
  • CHAPMAN C.S., 1997. Reflections on a contingent view of acconting, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol.22, pp.189-205.
  • DECOSTER D.T., FERTAKIS J.P., 1968. Budget-induced pressure and its relationship to supervisory behaviour, Journal of Accounting Research, nº6, pp.237-246.
  • GONVIDARAJAN Vijay, 1984. Appropriatness of accounting data in performance evaluation: an empirical examination of environmental uncertainty as intervening variable, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol.9 nº2, pp.125-135.
  • HARRISON G.L., 1993. Reliance on accounting performance measures in superior evaluative style, the influence of national culture and personality, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol.18, pp.319-339.
  • HARTMANN Frank G.H., 2000. The appropriatness of RAPM: toward the further development of theory, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol.25, nº4-5, pp.451-482.
  • HIRST Mark K., 1983. Reliance on accounting performance measures, task uncertainty and dysfunctional behaviour: some extensions, Journal of Accounting Research, nº21, pp.596-605.
  • HOPE Jeremy, FRASER Robin, 1997. Beyong budgeting…Breaking through the barrier to the “third wave”, Management Accounting, vol.75, December 1997, pp.20-23.
  • HOPE Jeremy, FRASER Robin, 2001. Más allá del proceso presupuestario, Harvard-Deusto Finanzas y Contabilidad, nº44, Nov-Dic 2001, pp.54-59.
  • HOPE Jeremy, FRASER Robin, 2003. Beyond Budgeting – How managers can break from the annual performance trap, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
  • HOPWOOD Anthony G., 1972. An empirical study of the role of accounting data performance evaluation, Journal of Accounting Research, vol.10, pp.156-182.
  • HOPWOOD Anthony G., 1973. An accounting system and managerial behaviour, Saxon House and Lexington, Westmead.
  • HOPWOOD Anthony G., 1974. Leadership climate and the use of accounting data in performance evaluation, The Accounting Review, vol.49, pp.485-495.
  • KAPLAN Robert S., NORTON David P., 1992. The Balance Scorecard: Measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb 1992.
  • KAPLAN Robert S., NORTON David P., 1996. Using the balance scorecard as a strategic management system, Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb 1996.
  • LINDSAY R.M., EHRENBERG A.S.C., 1993. The design of replicated studies, The American Statistician, nº47, pp.217-228.
  • MARGISSON David, OGDEN Stuart, 2005. Coping with ambiguity through the budget: the positive effects of budgetary targets on managers budgeting behaviours, Accounting, Organizations and Society, nº30 -5, July 2005, pp.435-456.
  • MINTZBERG Henry, 1994. The rise and fall of strategic planning, The free Press, New York.
  • MUÑIZ Luis, 2004. La esencia del cuadro de mando, Harvard-Deusto Finanzas y Contabilidad, nº62, Nov-Dic 2004, pp.4-14.
  • NIVEN Paul R., 2003. El cuadro de mando integral paso a paso, Gestión 2000, Barcelona.
  • OTLEY David T., 1978. Budget use and managerial performance, Journal of Accounting Research, vol.16 nº1, fall 1978, pp.122-149.
  • OTLEY David, FAKIOLAS Alexander, 2000. Reliance on accounting performance measures: dead end or new beginning?, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol.25, nº4-5, pp.497-510.
  • OTLEY David, POLLANEN Raili M., 2000. Budgetary criteria in performance evaluation: a critical appraisal using new evidence, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol.25, nº4-5, pp.483-496.
  • SIMONS Robert, 1995, Levers of Control, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
  • VAGNEUR K., PEIRPEL M., 2000, Reconsidering performance evaluation style, Accounting, Organization and Society, vol.25, nº4-5, pp.511-525.