Adaptación del "Cuestionario de Experiencias de Recuperación" a una muestra española

  1. Sanz Vergel, Ana Isabel
  2. Sebastián Herranz, Julia
  3. Rodríguez Muñoz, Alfredo
  4. Garrosa Hernández, Eva
  5. Moreno Jiménez, Bernardo
  6. Sonnentag, Sabine
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Any de publicació: 2010

Volum: 22

Número: 4

Pàgines: 990-996

Tipus: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Psicothema

Resum

El objetivo de este estudio consistió en examinar las propiedades psicométricas de la versión española del «Cuestionario de Experiencias de Recuperación» desarrollado por Sonnentag y Fritz. La muestra estaba compuesta por 941 trabajadores del sector de seguridad. Los resultados del análisis factorial exploratorio sugirieron la posibilidad de considerar una estructura de cuatro factores. En el análisis factorial confi rmatorio se mantuvo dicha estructura, siendo el modelo que mejor ajustaba a los datos el que presentaba cuatro factores con tres ítems cada uno correlacionados entre sí (CFI= 0,97, GFI= 0,96, NNFI= 0,96, RMSEA= 0,05 y AIC= 171,76). Por tanto, el cuestionario mantiene la distinción de cuatro experiencias de recuperación �distanciamiento psicológico del trabajo, relajación, búsqueda de retos y control sobre el tiempo libre� aunque con 12 ítems frente a los 16 de la escala original. El análisis de fi abilidad del cuestionario mostró que la escala posee una adecuada consistencia interna, con valores situados entre 0,75 y 0,88. Se encontraron correlaciones signifi cativas entre las experiencias de recuperación y diversas variables externas, lo que proporciona apoyo sobre su validez de constructo. Así pues, se considera que esta versión española posee adecuadas propiedades psicométricas y puede contribuir a ampliar el conocimiento sobre esta temática.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Bartlett, M.S. (1950). Test of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 77-85.
  • Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Brislin, R.W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216.
  • Comrey, A.L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. Nueva York: Academic Press.
  • De Lange, A.H., Taris, T.W., Kompier, M.A.J., Houtman, I.L.D., y Bongers, P.M. (2003). «The very best of the millenium»: Longitudinal research and the demand-control-support model. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8, 282-305.
  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A., Geurts, S., y Taris, T. (2009). Daily recovery from work-related effort during non-work time. En S. Sonnentag, P.L. Perrrewé y D.C. Ganster (Eds.): Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being (pp. 85-123). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
  • Dziuban, C.D., y Shirkey, E.C. (1974). When is a correlation appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 358-361.
  • Eden, D. (2001). Vacations and other respites: Studying stress on and off the job. En C.L. Cooper e I.T. Robertson (Eds.): International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 121-146). Chichester: Wiley.
  • Etzion, D., Eden, D., y Lapidot, Y. (1998). Relief from job stressors and burnout: Reserve service as a respite. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 577-585.
  • Fornell, C., y Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
  • Fritz, C., y Sonnentag, S. (2005). Recovery, health and job performance: Effects of weekend experiences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 187-199.
  • Fritz, C., y Sonnentag, S. (2006). Recovery, well-being and performance-related outcomes: The role of workload and vacation experiences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 936-945.
  • Geurts, S., y Sonnentag, S. (2006). Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 32, 482-492.
  • Goldberg, D. (1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. Londres: Oxford University Press.
  • Goldberg, D.P., e Hillier, V.F. (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9, 139-145.
  • Hambleton, R.K. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 229-244.
  • Mackenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M., y Jarvis, C.B. (2005). The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 710-730.
  • Moreno-Jiménez, B., Mayo, M., Sanz-Vergel, A.I., Geurts, S., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., y Garrosa, E. (2009). Effects of work-family conflict on employee's well-being: The moderating role of recovery strategies. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 427-440.
  • Moreno-Jiménez, B., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Pastor, J.C., Sanz-Vergel, A.I., y Garrosa, E. (2009). The moderating effects of psychological detachment and thoughts of revenge in workplace bullying. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 359-364.
  • Moreno-Jiménez, B., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Sanz-Vergel, A.I., y Rodríguez, R. (2008). El efecto del acoso psicológico en el insomnio: el papel del distanciamiento psicológico y la rumiación. Psicothema, 20, 760-765.
  • Nunnally, J.C., y Berstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). Nueva York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Rizzo, J.R., House, R.J., y Lirtzman, S.I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150-163.
  • Schaffer, B.S., y Riordan, C.M. (2003). A review of cross-cultural methodologies for organizational research: A best-practices approach. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 169-215.
  • Schaubroeck, J., Cotton, J.L., y Jennings, K.R. (1989). Antecedents and consequences of role stress: A covariance structure analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 35-58.
  • Sonnentag, S. (2001). Work, recovery activities and individual well-being: A diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 196-210.
  • Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 518-528.
  • Sonnentag, S., y Bayer, U. (2005). Switching off mentally: Predictors and consequences of psychological detachment from work during off-job time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 393-414.
  • Sonnentag, S., Binnewies, C., y Mojza, E.J. (2008). Did you have a nice evening? A day-level study on recovery experiences, sleep and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 674-684.
  • Sonnentag, S., y Fritz, C. (2007). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 204-221.
  • Sonnentag, S., Mojza, E.J., Binnewies, C., y Scholl, A. (2008). Being engaged at work and detached at home: A week-level study on work engagement, psychological detachment and affect. Work & Stress, 22, 257-276.
  • Thompson, B. (1994). The pivotal role of replication in psychological research: Empirically evaluating the replicability of sample results. Journal of Personality, 62, 157-179.
  • Tucker, L.R., y Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 35, 417-437.
  • Watson, D., Clark, L.A., y Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet