Team Learning and Effectiveness in Virtual Project Teamsthe Role of Beliefs about Interpersonal Context

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alcover, C. M., Gil, F. & Barrasa, A. (2004). Aprendizaje de Equipo: Adaptación en una muestra española de las escalas de actividades de aprendizaje, Psicothema, 16(3), 378-383. (Pubitemid 41310369)
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
• Cannon, M. D., & Edmondson, A. C. (2001). Confronting failure: Antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 161-177. (Pubitemid 33703140)
• Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246. (Pubitemid 128061788)
• Chan, C. C. A., Pearson, C., & Entrekin, L. (2003). Examining the effects of internal and external team learning on performance. Team Performance Management, 9, 174-181.
• Cohen, S. G., & Gibson, C. B. (2003). In the beginning: Introduction and Framework. In Gibson, C. B. & Cohen S. G. (Eds.) Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 1-13). NY: John Wiley & Sons.
• Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1986). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In B. Straw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 191-223). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
• De Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity and team performance: A motivated information processing perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 628-638.
• DeSanctis, G. & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147.
• Dunlap, W. P., Burke, M. J., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2003). Accurate test of statistical significance for rwG and average deviation interrater agreement indexes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 356-362.
• Edmondson, A. C. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 5-28.
• Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behaviors in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
• Edmondson, A. C. (2003a). Managing the risk of learning. In M. A. West, D. Tjosvold & K.G. Smith (Eds.). International Handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working (pp. 255-275). Chichester/London: Wiley.
• Edmondson, A. G (2003b). Speaking up in operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1419-1452.
• Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 685-716.
• Edmondson, A. C., Dillon, J. R., & Roloff, K. S. (2007). Three perspectives on team learning: Outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. The Academy of Management Annals, 1.
• Ellis, A. P. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., Illgen, D. R., Porter, C. O. L. H., West, B. J., & Moon, H. (2003). Team learning: collectively connecting the dots. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 821-835.
• Fuller, M. A., Hardin, A. M., & Davison, R. M. (2006). Efficacy in technology-mediated distributed teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 209-235.
• Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 451-495.
• Gibson, C. B., & Vermeulen, F. (2003). A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for teamlearning behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 202-239.
• Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context. A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
• Goodhue, D. L. & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19, 213-236.
• González, M. G., Burke, M. J., Santuzzy, A. M. & Bradley, J. G (2000). The impact of group process variables on the effectiveness of distance collaboration groups. Computers in Human Behaviors, 19, 629-648.
• González-Romá, V., Peiró, J. M., & Tordera, N. (2002). An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 465-473.
• Griffith, T. L., & Neale, M. A. (2001). Information, processing in traditional, hybrid and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 379-421.
• Hackman, J. R. (Ed.) (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Hindz, P. J. & Weisband, S. P. (2003). Knowledge sharing and shared understanding in virtual teams. In G B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen (Eds.) Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 1-13). NY: John Wiley & Sons.
• Huber, G. P. (1991) Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization science, 2, 88-115.
• Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, H. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543. (Pubitemid 40300795)
• Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A. & Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on teams and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29(6), 801-830. (Pubitemid 37453268)
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction.
• Jung, D. I., & Sosik, J. J. (2002). Transformational Leadership in work groups. The role of empowerment, cohesiveness and collective-efficacy on perceived group performance. Small Group Research, 33, 313-336.
• Kayworth, T. R., & Leidner, D. E. (2001-2002). Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 7-40.
• Kirkman, B. L. & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management. 31(5), 700-718.
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3) 77-124.
• Lent, R. W., Schmidt, J., & Schmidt, L. (2006). Collective Efficacy Beliefs in Student Work Teams: Relation to SelfEfficacy, Cohesion, and Performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 73-84. (Pubitemid 43141607)
• Lewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledgeworker teams: A Longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50(11), 1519-1533.
• Lewis, T. K., Tyran, C. K. & Shepherd, M. (2003). Exploring emerging leadership in virtual teams. In G B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen (Eds.) Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 1-13). NY: John Wiley & Sons.
• Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410-476.
• Martins, L. L., Wilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004), Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here?. Journal of Management. 30(6), 805-835. (Pubitemid 40030672)
• Montoya-Weiss, M., Massey, A. & Song, M. (2001). Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1251-1262 (Pubitemid 33388268)
• Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). The effect of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 941-966.
• Rico, R., Molleman, E., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., & Van der Vegt. (2007). The effects of diversity faultlines and team task autonomy on decision quality and social integration. Journal of Management, 33(1), 111-132.
• Salanova, M, Llorens, S., Cifre, E., Martinez, I. M., & Shaufeli, W. B. (2003). Perceived collective efficacy, subjective wellbeing and task performance among electronic work groups. Small Group Research, 34, 43-73. (Pubitemid 36209257)
• Salanick, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224-253.
• Senge, P. M. (1994). La Quinta Disciplina: el arte y la práctica de la organización abierta al aprendizaje. Argentina: Granica.
• Shepers, J., De Jong, A., Wetzeis, M., & De Ruyter, K. (2008). Psychological safety and social support in groupware adoption: A multi-level assessment in education. Computers & Education, 51, 757-775.
• Schiller, S. H., & Mandviwalla, M. (2007). Virtual team research. An analysis of theory use and a framework for theory appropriation. Small Group Research, 38, 12-59.
• Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Tasa, K., Taggar, S., & Seijts, G. H. (2007). The development of collective efficacy in teams: A multilevel and longitudinal perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology. 92, 17-27.
• Van den Boosche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Kirschner P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments. Small Group Research. 37, 490-521.
• Van der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 532-547. (Pubitemid 41053495)
• Van der Vegt, G. S., Emans, B. J., & Van de Vliert, E. (2001). Patterns of interdependence in work teams: A two-level investigation of the relations with job and team satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 54, 51-69. (Pubitemid 33588561)
• Van Offenbeek, M. (2001). Processes and outcomes from team learning. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 10, 303-317.
• Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180.
• Watson, C. B., Chemers, M. M., & Preiser, N. (2001). Collective efficacy: A multilevel analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(8), 1057-1068.
• West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 355-424.
• Wilson, J. M., Goodman, P. S., & Cronin, M. A. (2007). Group learning. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1041-1059.
• Wong, S. (2003). Collective cognition in teams: The role of interactive learning and effects on team performance. Paper presented at the 63th Meeting of the Academy of Management, Seattle, WA.
• Wong, S. (2004). Distal and local group learning: performance trade-offs and tensions. Organization Science, 15, 645-656.
• Zellmer-Bruhn, M., & Gibson, C. (2006). Multinational Organization Context: Implications for team learning and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 501-518. (Pubitemid 43999079)