On the premium of equity-linked insurance contracts

  1. Balbás Aparicio, Beatriz
  2. Balbás Aparicio, Raquel
Revista:
Anales del Instituto de Actuarios Españoles

ISSN: 0534-3232

Año de publicación: 2010

Número: 16

Páginas: 25-42

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Anales del Instituto de Actuarios Españoles

Resumen

Estudiaremos el problema de la valoración de contratos de seguro ligados al mercado financiero, tales como las anualidades o rentas ligadas a índices bursátiles. Introduciremos un principio de prima basado en la optimización de medidas de riesgo coherentes y acotadas por la media. Este principio parece presentar una serie de propiedades de interés. En efecto, en primer lugar, es sub-aditivo, por lo que favorece la diversificación. Segundo, se integran los riesgos actuariales y financieros, y no hace falta suponer independencia de los mismos. Tercero, se proporcionarán estrategias de cobertura para el asegurador. Y cuarto, la prima del contrato es fácil de calcular en las aplicaciones prácticas, puesto que sólo hay que resolver problemas de programación lineal, pese a que las medidas de riesgo están lejos de ser lineales.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, E.J. and P. Nash, 1987. Linear programming in infinitedimensional spaces. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Artzner, P., F. Delbaen, J.M. Eber and D. Heath, 1999. Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 9, 203-228.
  • Balbás, A. and R. Balbás, 2009. Compatibility between pricing rules and risk measures: The CCVaR. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias, RACSAM, 103, 2, 251 - 264.
  • Balbás, A., B. Balbás and R. Balbás, 2010a. Optimizing measures of risk by saddle point conditions. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 234, 2924-2931.
  • Balbás, A., R. Balbás and J. Garrido, 2010b. Extending pricing rules with general risk functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 201, 23 -33.
  • Balbás, A., B. Balbás and A. Heras, 2008. Risk levels upper bounds with general risk functions. Anales del Instituto de Actuaros Españoles, 14, 23 –46 .
  • Balbás, A., B. Balbás and A. Heras, 2009. Optimal reinsurance with general risk measures. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44, 374 - 384.
  • Barbarin, J. and P. Devolder. 2005. Risk measure and fair valuation of an investment guarantee in life insurance. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 37, 2, 297-323.
  • Bernard, C. and W. Tian, 2009. Optimal reinsurance arrangements under tail risk measures. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 76, 3, 709-725.
  • Brown, D., Sim, M., 2009. Satisfying measures for analysis of risky positions. Management Science, 55, 71 - 84.
  • Calafiore, G.C., 2007. Ambiguous risk measures and optimal robust portfolios. SIAM Journal of Optimization, 18, 3. 853-877.
  • Centeno, M.L. and O. Simoes, 2009. Optimal reinsurance. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias, RACSAM, 103, 2, 387-405.
  • Cherny, A.S., 2006. Weighted V@R and its properties. Finance & Stochastics, 10, 367-393.
  • Cochrane, J.H., 2001. Asset pricing. Princeton University Press.
  • Deprez, O. and U. Gerber, 1985. On convex principles of premium calculation. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 4, 179-189.
  • Gaillardetz, P., 2008. Valuation of life insurance products under stochastic interest rates. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 42, 212-226.
  • Gao, F., F. Song and L. Zhang, 2007. Coherent risk measures, equilibrium and equilibrium pricing. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 40, 85-94
  • Hamada, M. and M. Sherris, 2003. Contingent claim pricing using probability distortion operators: Methods from insurance risk pricing and their relationship to financial theory. Applied Mathematical Finance, 10, 19-47.
  • Horvàth, J., 1966. Topological vector spaces and distributions, vol I. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
  • Kaluszka, M. 2005. Optimal reinsurance under convex principles of premium calculation. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 36, 375-398.
  • Luenberger, D.G., 1969. Optimization by vector space methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Mansini, R., W. Ogryczak and M.G. Speranza, 2007. Conditional value at risk and related linear programming models for portfolio optimization. Annals of Operations Research, 152, 227-256.
  • Nakano, Y., 2003. Minimizing coherent risk measures of shortfall in discrete-time models with constraints. Applied Mathematical Finance, 10, 163-181.
  • Nakano, Y., 2004. Efficient hedging with coherent risk measure. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 293, 345-354.
  • Ogryczak, W. and A. Ruszczynski, 1999. From stochastic dominance to mean risk models: Semideviations and risk measures. European Journal of Operational Research, 116, 33-50.
  • Ogryczak, W. and A. Ruszczynski, 2002. Dual stochastic dominance and related mean risk models. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 13, 60-78.
  • Rockafellar, R.T., S. Uryasev and M. Zabarankin, 2006. Generalized deviations in risk analysis. Finance & Stochastics, 10, 51-74.
  • Staum, J., 2004. Fundamental theorems of asset pricing for good deal bounds. Mathematical Finance, 14, 141-161.
  • Wang, S.S., 2000. A class of distortion operators for pricing financial and insurance risks. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 67, 15-36.