Relevancia de distintas estrategias "Open innovation" para las empresas que hacen I+D

Referencias bibliográficas

• Argote, L. (1993). Group and organizational learning curves: Individual, system and environmental components. British Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32, 31-51.
• Arora, A. and Gambardella, A. (1990). Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. Journal of Industrial Economics 38, 361-379.
• Bayona, C., Garcia-Marco, T. and Huerta, E. (2001). Firms' motivations for co-operative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Research Policy 30, 1289-1307.
• Becheikh, N., Landry, R. and Amara, N. (2006). Lessons from Innovation Empirical Studies in the Manufacturing Sector: a Systematic Review of the Literature from 1993-2003. Technovation 26, 644-664.
• Becker, W. and Dietz, J. (2004). R&D co-operation and innovation activities of firms-evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy 33, 209-223.
• Beneito, P. (2006). The innovative performance of in-house and contracted R&D in terms of patents and utility models. Research Policy 35, 502-517.
• Bessant, J. and Rush, H. (1995). Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer. Research Policy 24, 97-114.
• Caloghirou, Y., Ioannides, S. and Vonortas, N. (2003). Research Joint Ventures. Journal of Economics Surveys 17(4), 541-570.
• Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D co-operation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review 92(4), 1169-1185.
• Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge adquisition. Management Science 52(1), 62-82.
• Chesbrough, H. and Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management 36(3), 229-236.
• Chesbrough, H. W. (2003a). Open Innovation - The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston (MA): Harvard Business School Press,.
• Chesbrough, H. W. (2003b). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review 44(3), 35-41.
• Cockburn, I. and Henderson, R. (1998). Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behaviour and the organization of research in drug discovery. Journal of Industrial Economics 46, 157-182.
• Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective of learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1), 128-152.
• Cohen, W. M. (1995). Empirical studies of innovative activity. In: Stoneman, P. (Ed.) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford: Blac-kwell, pp.182-264.
• Colombo, M. G. (2003). Alliance form: A test of the contractual and competence perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 24, 1209-1229.
• Creplet, F., Dupouet, O., Kern, F., Mehmanpazir, B., and Munier, F. (2001). Consultants and experts in management consulting firms. Research Policy 30, 1517-1535.
• Cuervo-Cazurra, A. and Un, C. A. (2007). Regional economic integration and R&D investment. Research Policy 36, 227-246.
• Den Hertog, P. and Bilderbeek, R. (2000). The new knowledge infrastructure: the role of technology based knowledge intensive business services in national innovation systems In: Boden, M. and Miles, I. (Eds), Services and the knowledge-based economy. London and New York: Continuum, 222-246.
• Díaz-Díaz, N. L., Aguiar-Díaz, I. and De Saá-Pérez, P. (2006). Technological knowledge assests in industrial firms. R&D Management 36, 2, 189-203.
• Fey, C. F. and Birkinshaw, J. (2005). External Sources of Knowledge, Governance Mode, and R&D Performance. Journal of Management 31, 597-621.
• Galende, J. and Suárez, I. (1999). A Resource-Based Analysis of the Factors Determining a Firm's R&D Activities. Research Policy 28, 891-905.
• Garcia, R. and Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management 19, 110-132.
• García Canal, E., Valdés-Llaneza, A. and Sánchez-Lorda, P. (2008). Technological flows and choice of joint ventures in technology alliances. Research Policy 37, 97-114.
• Gassmann, O. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. R&D Management 36(3), 223-228.
• Gooroochurn, N. and Hanley, A. (2007). A tale of two literatures: Transaction costs and property rights in innovation outsourcing. Research Policy 36, 1483-1495.
• Greene, W. (2000). Econometric Analysis. 4th edition Upper Saddle River, N.J. Prentice Hall.
• Grossman, S. and Hart, O. (1986). The costs and benefits of ownership: a theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy 94, 691-719.
• Hansen, P. and Serin, G. (1997). Will low technology products disappear? The hidden innovation processes in low technology industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 55, 179-191.
• Haour, G. (1992). Stretching the knowledge base of the enterprise through contract research. R&D Management 22, 177-182.
• Heckman, J. (1981). Statistical models for discrete panel data, in The Econometrics of Panel data. Ed. McFadden D. and C. Manski. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 114-178.
• Hsiao, C. (1986). Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge university Press, New York.
• Huergo, E. (2006). The role of technological management as a source of innovation: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy 35, 1377-1388.
• Iansiti, M. (1997). From technological potential to product performance: An empirical analysis. Research Policy 26, 3, 345-365.
• Kamien, M. and Schwartz, N. (1982). Market structure and innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kim, L. (1997). The dynamics of Samsunǵs technological learning in semiconductors. California Management Review 39, 86-100.
• Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organisation Science 3, 383-397.
• Koschatzky, K. (2004). The role of R&D services in managing regional knowledge generation -a regional differentiation-, in: Karlsson, C., Flensburg, P., Hörte, S.A. (Eds.), Knowledge spillovers and knowledge management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 254-297.
• Kumar, N. and Saqib, M. (1996). Firm size, opportunities for adaptation and in-house R&D activity in developing countries: the case of Indian manufacturing. Research Policy 25(5), 713-22.
• Laursen, K. and Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 27, 131-150.
• Lee, J. D. and Park, C. (2006). Research and development linkages in a national innovation system: Factor affecting success and failure in Korea. Technovation 26, 1045-1054.
• Liker, J., Collins, P. and Hull, F. M. (1999). Flexibility and standardization: test of a contingency model of product design-manufacturing integration. Journal of Product Innovation Management 16, 248-267.
• Madsen, T. L., Mosakowski, E. and Zaheer, S. (2003). Knowledge retention and personnel mobility: The Nondisruptive effects of inflows of experience. Management Science 14(2), 173-191.
• Metcalfe, S. (1997). Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. In: Archibugi, D., Michie, J. (Eds.), Technology globalisation and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 268-396.
• Mowery, D. and Rosenberg, N. (1989). Technology and the pursuit of economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Muller, E. (2001). Innovation interactions between knowledge-business services and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. New York: Physica-Verlag Heildeberg,.
• Muller, E. and Zenker, A. (2001). Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBs in regional and national innovation systems. Research Policy 30, 1501-1516.
• Narula, R. (2001). In-house R&D, outsourcing or alliances? Some strategic and economic considerations. In: Contractor, F. R. (Ed.), The Valuation of Intangible Assets in Global Operations. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
• Neter, J., Wasserman, W. and Kutner, M. H. (1989). Applied regression models. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
• Nieto, M. J. and Santamaria, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation 27, 367-377.
• OECD. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation. 3rd ed. OECD Publications, Paris.
• Oxley, J. E. (1997). Appropriabilitiy hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach. Journal of Business and Economics Statistics 3, 387-409.
• Palmberg, C. (2004). The sources of innovations -Looking beyond technological opportunities. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13, 2, 183-197.
• Pisano, G. P. (1990). The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 153-176.
• Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G. (1990). The core competences of the corporation. Harvard Business Review 68(3), 71-91.
• Reichstein, T. and Salter, A. (2006). Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change 15(4), 653-682.
• Rigby, D. and Zook, C. (2002). Open-market innovation. Harvard Business Review 80(10), 80-89.
• Robertson, T. S. and Gatignon, H. (1998). Technolgoy Development Mode: A Transaction Cost Conceptualization. Strategic Management Journal 19(6), 515-531.
• Robertson, P. L. and Patel, P. R. (2007). New wine in old bottles: Technological diffusion in developed economies. Research Policy 36, 5, 708-721.
• Sampson, R. C. (2004). Organizational choice in R&D alliances: Knowledge-based and transaction cost perspectives. Managerial and Decision Economics 25, 421-436.
• Sampson, R. C. (2007). R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversi ty and alliance organization on innovation. Academy of Management Journal 50(2), 364-386.
• Siegel, D., Waldman, D., Atwater, L. and Link, A. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research 14, 111-133.
• Smallbone, D., North, D. and Leigh, R. (1993). The use of external assistance by mature SMEs in the UK: some policy implications. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 5, 279-295.
• Solow, R. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics 39, 312-320.
• Song, J., Almeida, P. and Wu, G. (2001). Mobility of engineers and cross-border knowledge building: The technological catching-up case of Korea and Taiwanese semiconductor firms. In: Chesbrough, H., Burgelman, R. (Eds.), Research in Technology and Innovation Management. New York: Elsevier, pp. 59-84.
• Song, J., (2003). Learning-by-Hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Science 49(4), 351-365.
• Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
• Teece, D. J. (1988). Technological change and the nature of the firm. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 256-281.
• Tether, B. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why. An empirical analysis. Research Policy 31, 947-967.
• Teubal, M. (1997). A catalytic and evolutionary approach to horizontal technology policies (HTPs). Research Policy 25, 1161-1188.
• Teubal, M. (2002). What is the system perspective to Innovation and Technology Policy (TIP) and how can we apply it to developing and newly industrialized economies? Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12, 233-257.
• Tsai, K-H. and Wang, J-C. (2009). External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey. Research Policy 38, 518-526.
• Utterback, J. M. and Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A Dynamic Model of Product and Process Innovation. Omega 3(6), 639-656.
• Utterback, J. M. (1994). Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Boston (MA): Harvard Business School Press.
• Van Helleputte, J. and Reid, A. (2004). Tackling the paradox: can attaining global research excellence can be compatible with local technology development? R&D Management 34(1), 33-44.
• Veugelers, R. (1997). Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy 26, 303-315.
• Veugelers, R. and Cassiman, B. (1999). Make and buy in innovation strategies: Evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy 28, 63-80.
• Vonortas, N. (1997). Cooperation in Research and Development. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.
• West, J. and Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Management 36(3), 319-331.
• Williamson, O.E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism, firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: The Free Press.
• Williamson, O.E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: the case of candor. Academy of Management Review 21, 48-57.
• Wood, P. (2002). Knowledge-intensive services and urban innovativeness. Urban Studies 39(5-6), 993-1002.