The Role of Mental Load in Inattentional Blindness

  1. Pérez Moreno, Elisa
  2. Conchillo Jiménez, Ángela
  3. Recarte Goldaracena, Miguel Ángel
Revista:
Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

ISSN: 1576-8597

Año de publicación: 2011

Volumen: 32

Número: 2

Páginas: 255-278

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

Resumen

The purpose of this investigation is to determine whether the mental load of a cognitive task prevents the processing of visual stimuli, that is, whether the mental load produces inattentional blindness, and at what point in the cognitive-task processing more interference is produced. An arithmetic task with two levels of mental load was used in a dual-task situation with a visual search and detection task. An experiment was performed with 35 participants. An eye tracker system (ASL model 5000) was used to verify which targets were looked at. The results show impairment in the detection task when carrying out the two tasks simultaneously; it was higher when the arithmetic task had a higher mental load. The impairment cannot be explained by alteration in the ocular pattern. The moment at which the process or sub-process of the arithmetic task produces the greatest interference in visual detection corresponds to the purely cognitive moment of calculus, versus sub-processes with perceptive or motor components, such as listening to the stimuli or emitting responses.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Beck, D. M., & Lavie, N. (2005). Look here but ignore what you see: Effects of distractors at fixation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(3), 592-607.
  • Byrne, M. D., & Anderson, J. R. (1998). Perception and action. In J. R. Anderson & C. Lebiere (Eds.), The atomic components of thought (pp. 167-200). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cartwright-Finch, U., & Lavie, N. (2007). The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Cognition, 102(3), 321-340.
  • De Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. (2001). The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science, 291, 1803-1806.
  • Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96(3), 433-458.
  • Fougnie, D., & Marois, R. (2007). Executive working memory load induces inattentional blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(1), 142-147.
  • Goldstein, E. B. (2002). Sensation and perception. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Han, S. H., & Kim, M. S. (2004). Visual search does not remain efficient when executive working memory is working. Psychological Science, 15(9), 623-628.
  • Karlin, L., & Kestenbaum, R. (1968). Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(2), 167-178.
  • Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 75-82.
  • Lavie, N. (2006). The role of perceptual load in visual awareness. Brain Research, 1080(1), 91-100.
  • Lavie, N., & De Fockert, J. W. (2005). The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(4), 669-674.
  • Lavie, N., Hirst, A., De Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(3), 339-354.
  • Macdonald, J. S. P., & Lavie, N. (2008). Load induced blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1078-1091.
  • Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Noe, A., & O'Regan, J. K. (2000). Perception, attention, and the grand illusion. Psyche, 6(15), 6-15.
  • Oh, S. H., & Kim, M. S. (2004). The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(2), 275-281.
  • Pashler, H. E. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220-244.
  • Pashler, H. E. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Perez-Moreno, E., Conchillo, A., & Recarte, M. A. (2011). Interference in visual perception by verbal and spatial cognitive activity. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14 (2).
  • Recarte, M. A., & Nunes, L. M. (2003). Mental workload while driving: Effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 9(2), 119-133.
  • Recarte, M. A., Perez, E., Conchillo, A., & Nunes, L. M. (2008). Mental workload and visual impairment: differences between pupil, blink, and subjective rating. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 374-385.
  • Sanders, A. (1998). Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
  • Todd, J. J., Fougnie, D., & Marois, R. (2005). Visual short-term memory load suppresses temporo-parietal junction activity and induces inattentional blindness. Psychological Science, 16(12), 965-972.
  • Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63-102). New York: Academic Press.
  • Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering Psychology and human performance. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(2), 269-274.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet