Contrastes entre spin-offs universitarios y empresas de base tecnológica independientesEl caso del Parque Científico de Madrid

  1. Molero Zayas, José
  2. Maldonado Carrillo, Georgina
Revista:
Dirección y organización: Revista de dirección, organización y administración de empresas

ISSN: 1132-175X

Año de publicación: 2012

Número: 46

Páginas: 16-30

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.37610/DYO.V0I46.388 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Dirección y organización: Revista de dirección, organización y administración de empresas

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ÁLVAREZ, J., DÍAZ, F., y ÁLVAREZ, I. (2001). El sistema canario de innovación y el sector turístico, Santa Cruz de Tenerife: Fundación FYDE-Caja Canarias.
  • BADE, F. J., y NERLINGER, E. A. (2000). «The spatial distribution of new technology-based firms: empirical results for West Germany». Regional Science, 79, pp. 155- 176.
  • BOZEMAN, B. (2000). «Technology transfer and public policy. A review of research and a theory». Research Policy, 29, pp. 627-655.
  • CALLAN, B. (2001). Introduction: The new spin on spinoffs. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/document/57/0,3343, en_2649_34409_2046201_1_1_1_1,00.html.
  • CARAYANNIS, E., ROGERS, E., KUROHARA, K., y ALLBRITTON, M. (1998). «High-technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities». Technovation, 18 (1), pp. 1-11.
  • COHEN, W., NELSON, R., y WALSH, J. (2000). «Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not)». NBER Working Paper Series, N° 7552. Tomado de: Yang, Ch., Motohashi. K., Y CHEN, J. (2009). «Are new technology-based firms located in science parks really more innovative? Evidence from Taiwan». Research Policy, 38, pp. 77-85.
  • COLOMBO M., y DELMASTRO, M. (2002). «How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy». Research Policy, 31, pp. 1103-1122.
  • D’ESTE, P., y PATEL, P. (2007). «University-industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interaction with industry?». Research Policy, 36, pp. 1295-1313.
  • ENSLEY, M., y HMIELESKI, K. (2005). «A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between university-based and independent star t-ups». Research Policy, 34, pp. 1091-1105.
  • ETZKOWITZ, H. (2003). «Innovation in innovation: the triple helix of university-industry-government relations». Social Science Information, 42 (3), pp. 293-337.
  • ETZKOWITZ, H., WEBSTER, A., GEBHARDT, CH., y CANTISANO, B. (2000). «The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of Ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm». Research Policy, 29, pp. 313- 330.
  • GARAVELLI, C ., GORGOGLIONE, M., y SCOZZI, B. (2002). «Managing knowledge transfer by knowledge technologies». Technovation, 22, pp. 269-279.
  • LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000). «The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations». Research Policy, 29, pp. 243- 255.
  • LINK, A., y SCOTT, J. (2005). «Opening the ivory tower´s door : an analysis of the determinants of the formation of US university spin-off companies». Research Policy, 34, pp. 1106-1112.
  • LINK, A., y SIEGEL, D. (2005). «University-based technology initiatives: quantitative and qualitative evidence». Research Policy, 34, pp. 253-257.
  • LOCKETT, A., SIEGEL, D., WRIGHT, M., y ENSLEY, M. D. (2005). «The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications». Research Policy, 34, pp. 981–993.
  • LOCKETT, A., y WRIGHT, M. (2005). «Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies». Research Policy, 34, pp. 1043-1057.
  • LÖFSTEN, H., y LINDELÖF, P. (2002). «Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms—academicindustry links, innovation and markets». Research Policy, 31, pp. 859-876.
  • LÖFSTEN, H., y LINDELÖF, P. (2005). «R&D networks and product innovation patterns—academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on science parks». Technovation, 25, pp. 1025-1037.
  • MOLERO, J. (2008). «La transferencia de tecnología revisitada: conceptos básicos y nuevas reflexiones a par tir de un modelo de gestión de excelencia». Arbor, CLXXXIV (732), pp. 637-651.
  • MONCK, C.S.P., PORTER, R.B., QUINTAS, P., STOREY, D., y WYNARCZYK, P. (1988). Science parks and the growth of high technology firms, Londres: Croom Helm. Tomado de: Löfsten, H., y Lindelöf, P. (2005). «R&D networks and product innovation patterns—academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on science parks». Technovation, 25, pp. 1025-1037.
  • MOTOHASHI, K. (2005). «University research policy –industry collaborations in Japan: the role of new technology-based firms in transforming the national innovation system». Research Policy, 34, pp. 583-594.
  • MUELLER, P. (2006). «Exploring the knowledge filter : How entrepreneurship and university-industry relationships drive economic growth». Research Policy, 35, pp. 1499- 1508.
  • MUSTAR, P., RENAULT, M., COLOMBO, M., PIVA, E., FONTES, M., LOCKETT, A., WRIGHT, M., CLARYSSE, B. y MORAY, N. (2006). «Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: a multi-dimensional taxonomy». Research Policy, 35, pp. 289-308.
  • PCM (2008). Memoria 2008 del Parque Científico de Madrid. http://www.fpcm.es/
  • PHAN, P., SIEGEL, D., y WRIGHT, M. (2005). «Science parks and incubators: observations, synthesis and future research». Journal of Business Venturing, 20, pp. 165-182.
  • QUINTAS, P., WIELD, D., y MASSEY, D. (1992). «Academicindustry links and innovation: questioning the science park model». Technovation, 12, pp. 161-175.
  • TOMADO DE: LÖFSTEN, H., Y LINDELÖF, P. (2002). «Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms-academic-industry links, innovation and markets». Research Policy, 31, pp. 859-876.
  • RODEIRO, D., y otros (2008). La creación de empresas en el sistema universitario español, Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
  • STOREY, D., y TETHER, B. (1998). «Public policy measures to support new technology-based firms in the European Union». Research Policy, 26, pp. 1037-1057.
  • TIDD, J., BESSANT, J., y PAVITT, K. (2005). Managing innovation. Integrating technological, marketing and organizational change, West Sussex: Wiley.
  • WRIGHT, M., CLARYSSE, B., LOCKETT, A., y KNOCKAERT, M. (2008). «Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries». Research Policy, 37, pp. 1205-1223.
  • YANG, CH., MOTOHASHI, K., y CHEN, J. (2009). «Are new technology-based firms located in science parks really more innovative? Evidence from Taiwan». Research Policy, 38, pp. 77-85.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet