¿Son los nuevos criterios de evaluación en el marco del EEES adecuados para valorar el rendimiento académico de los alumnos? Experiencia en Contabilidad Financiera

Referencias bibliográficas

• AHUMADA ACEBEDO, P. [1998]: Hacia una evaluación de los aprendizajes en una perspectiva constructivista, Revista de Enfoques Educacionales, 1 (2): 1-16. http://www.saladehistoria.com/educacion/Ahumada_1998.pdf
• ALBANESE, M.A. Y MITCHELL, S. [1993]: Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues, Academic Medicine, 68: 52-81.
• ÁLVAREZ VALDIVIA, I. [2008]: Evaluación del aprendizaje en la universidad: una mirada retrospectiva y prospectiva desde la divulgación científica, Revista Electrónica de Investigación Psicoeducativa, 14 (6): 235-272.
• ANTEPOHL, W. Y HERZIG, S. [2002]: Problem-based learning versus lecture-based learning in a course of basic Pharmacology: a controlled, randomized study. Medical Education, 33 (2): 106-113.
• ARQUERO J.L, JIMÉNEZ, S.M Y JOYCE, J. [2004]: Skills development, motivation and learning in financial statement analysis: an evaluation of alternative types of case studies, Accounting Education, 13 (2): 191-212.
• ARQUERO, J.L., HASSALL, T., JOYCE, J. Y DONOSO, J.A. [2007]: Accounting students and communication apprehension: A study of Spanish and UK students, European Accounting Review, 16 (2): 299–322.
• ASBAUGH, H., JOHNSTONE, K.M. Y WARFIELD, T.D. [2002]: Outcome assessment of a writing-skill improvement initiative: results and methodological implications, Issues in Accounting Education, 17 (2): 123-148.
• BALLANTINE, J.A., Y MCCOURT, P. [2004]: A critical analysis of student’s perceptions of the usefulness of the case study method in an advanced management accounting module: the impact of relevant work experience, Accounting Education, 13 (2): 171-189.
• BALLANTINE, J.A., DUFF, A. Y MCCOURT, P. [2008]: Accounting and business students’ approaches to learning: A longitudinal study, Journal of Accounting Education, 26 (4): 188-201.
• BONK, C., SMITH, J. Y STEVENSON, G. [1998]: Alternative instructional strategies for creative and critical thinking in the Accounting curriculum, Journal of Accounting Education, 16 (2): 261-293.
• BOYCE, G., WILLIAMS, S., KELLY, A. Y YEE, H. [2001]: Fostering deep and elaborative learning and generic (soft) skill development: the strategic use of case studies in accounting education, Accounting Education, 10 (1): 37-60.
• BRYANT, S.M. Y HUNTON, J.E. [2000]: The use of technology in the delivery of instruction: Implications for Accounting Educators and Education Researchers, Issues in Accounting Education, 15 (1): 129-162.
• CAMACHO MIÑANO, M.M. [2009]: Uso de mandos interactivos en la docencia universitaria. Aplicación práctica en la asignatura de Contabilidad Financiera I. Proyecto MATHEMATICAL-LEARNING. http://cimanet.uoc.edu/mel/content/view/75/82/lang,spanish/
• CHAÍN NAVARRO, C.; MARTÍNEZ SOLÍS, L. Y SÁNCHEZ BAENA, J.J. [2010]: Motivar desde la innovación en la enseñanza universitaria: el Blog Qalidad, Revista de Educación a Distancia, 21: 1-17
• CLINTON, B.D. Y KOHLMEYER III, J.M. [2005]: The effects of group quizzes on performance and motivation to learn: two experiments in cooperative learning, Journal of Accounting Education, 23: 96-116.
• CULLEN, J., RICHARDSON, S. Y O´BRIEN, R. [2004]: Exploring the teaching potential of empirically-based case studies, Accounting Education, 13 (2): 251-266.
• DANZINGER, N. Y EDEN, Y. [2006]: Student career aspirations and perceptions: The case of Israeli Accounting students, Accounting Education: an International Journal, 15(2): 113-134.
• DELGADO GARCÍA, A.M. Y OLIVER CUELLO, R. [2006]: La evaluación continua en un nuevo escenario docente, Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 3 81): 1-13. http://www.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/rusc/article/view/v3n1-delgadooliver/v3n1-delgado-oliver
• DOCHY, F.; SEGER, M. Y DIERICK, S. [2008]: Nuevas vías de aprendizaje y enseñanza: sus consecuencias: una nueva era de evaluación, Revista de Docencia Universitaria. 2 (2): http://revistas.um.es/index.php/red_u/article/view/20051/19411
• DUFF, A. [2004]: The role of cognitive learning styles in accounting education: developing learning competencies, Journal of Accounting Education, 22 (1): 29-52. DEL FAVERO, L.; BOSCOLO, P.; VIDOTTO, G. Y VICENTINI, M. [2007]: Classroom discussion and individual problem-solving in the teaching of History: Do different instructional approaches affect interest in different ways? Learning and Instruction, 17 (6): 635-657.
• FELDER, R.M. [1995]: Cooperative learning in a sequence of engineering courses: a success story, Cooperative Learning and College Teaching Newsletter, 5 (2): 10–13.
• FELDER, R.M.; FELDER, G.N. Y DIETZ, E.J. [1998]: A longitudinal study of Engineering student performance and retention v. comparisons with traditionally-taught students, Journal of Engineering Education, 87 (4): 469-480.
• GABBIN, A.L. Y WOOD, L.I. [2008]: An experimental study of Accounting Majors´ academic achievement using cooperative learning groups, Issues in Accounting Education, 23 (3): 391-404.
• GORDON, J.A.; SHAFFER, D. W.; RAEMER, D. B.; PAWLOWSKI, J.; HURFORD, W.E. Y COOPER, J. B. [2006]: A randomized controlled trial of simulation-based teaching versus traditional instruction in medicine: a pilot study among clinical medical students, Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11 (1): 33-39.
• GREENHOW, C.; ROBELIA B. Y HUGHES, J.E. [2009]: Learning, teaching and scholarship in a digital age. Web 2.0 and classroom research: what path should we take now?, Educational Researcher, 38 (4): 246-259.
• GURPINAR, E.; MUSAL, B.; AKSAKOGLU, G. Y UCKU, R. [2005]: Comparison of knowledge scores of medical students in problem-based learning and traditional curriculum on public health topics, BMC Medical Education, 5 (7): 1-8.
• HAGHIGHI, A.M.; VAKIL, R. Y WETIBA, J.K. [2006]: Reverse-Traditional/Hands-on: An alternative method of teaching Statistics, Applications and Applied Mathematics, 1 (1): 62-82.
• HALABI, A.K.; TUOVINEN, J.E. Y FARLEY, A.A. [2005]: Empirical evidence on the relative efficiency of worked examples versus problem-solving exercises in Accounting Principles instruction, Issues in Accounting Education, 20 (1): 21-32.
• HARRINGTON, K. [2010]: Assessment: How do you really know? in UPTON, D. y TRAPP, A. (eds) Teaching Psychology in Higher Education (Blackwell and British Psychological Society Publishing.).
• HEAGY, C.D. Y LEHMANN, C.M. [2005]: “Is PBL an improved delivery method for the Accounting curriculum?” Advances in Accounting Education, 7, 225-251.
• HOLBERT, K.E. Y KARADY, G.G. [2009]: Strategies, Challenges and prospects for active learning in the computer-based classroom, IIIE Transactions on Education, 52 (2): 31-38.
• JOHNSON, H.D. Y DASGUPTA, N. [2005]: Traditional versus Non-traditional teaching: Perspectives of students in Introductory Statistics Classes, Journal of Statistics Education, 13(2). http://www.amstat.org/publications/JSE/v13n2/johnson.html.
• KVAM, P.H. [2000]: The effect of Active Learning methods on student retention in Engineering Statistics, The American Statistician, 54 (2): 136-140.
• LORD, B.R. Y ROBERTSON, J. [2006]: Students’ experiences of learning in a third-year management accounting class: evidence from New Zealand, Accounting Education: An International Journal, 15 (1): 41-59.
• LYCKE, K.H.; GROTTUM, P. Y STROMSO, H.I. [2006]: Student learning strategies, mental models and learning outcomes in problem-based and traditional curricula in medicine, Medical Teacher, 28 (8): 717–722.
• MARTIN, T.; RIVALE, S.D. Y DILLER, K.R. [2007]: Comparison of student learning in challengebased and traditional instruction in Biomedical Engineering, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 35(8): 312–323.
• MARTON, F. Y SÄLJÖ, R. [1976]: On qualitative differences in learning: I. Outcome and process, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46 (1): 115-127.
• MILNE, M. J. Y MCCONNEILL, P.J. [2001]: Problem-Based learning: a pedagogy for using case material in accounting education, Accounting Education, 10(1): 61-82.
• MOLERO LÓPEZ BARAJAS, D. [2007]: Rendimiento académico y opinión sobre la docencia del alumnado participante en experiencias piloto de implantación del Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior, Relieve, 13 (2). http://www.uv.es/RELIEVE/v13n2/RELIEVEv13n2_2.pdf
• MURPHY, R. [2006]: Evaluating new priorities for assessment in higher education en Bryan, C. y Clegg, K. (eds.): Innovative assessment in Higher education. (New York: Routledge).
• NANDI, P.L.; CHAN, J.N.F. Y CHAN, C.P. [2000]: Undergraduate medical education: comparison of problem-based learning and conventional teaching. Hong Kong Medical Journal, 6: 301-306.
• NOURI, H. Y SHAHID, A. [2005]: The effect of Power Point presentations on student learning and attitudes, Global Perspectives on Accounting Education, 2: 53-73. http://gpae.bryant.edu/~gpae/vol2/04- 046%20The%20Effect%20of%20PowerPoint%20Presentations%20on%20Student% 20Learning.pdf
• POTTER, B.N. Y JOHNSTON, C.G. [2006]: The effect of interactive on-line learning systems on student learning outcomes in accounting, Journal of Accounting Education, 24 (1): 16-34.
• PRINCE, M.J. [2004]: Does active learning work? A review of the research, Journal of Engineering Education, 93 (3): 223-246.
• PRINCE, M.J. Y FELDER, R.M [2006]: Inductive teaching and learning methods: definitions, comparisons and research bases, Journal of Engineering Education, 95 (2): 123-138.
• RAVENSCROFT, S.P.; BUCKLESS, F.A.; MCCOMBS G.B. Y ZUCKERMAN, G.J. [1995]: Incentives in student team learning: An experiment in cooperative group learning, Issues in Accounting Education, 10 (1): 97-109.
• SÁNCHEZ , P. [2009]: The design, implementation and evaluation of a Pilot scheme adapted to the Bologna goals at tertiary level, Higher Education in Europe, 34 (1): 77-89.
• SAVANDER-RANNE, C.; LUDEN, O.P. Y KOLARI, S. [2008]: An alternative teaching method for electrical engineering courses, IEEE Transactions on Education, 51 (4): 423-431.
• SCHMIDT, H.G.; DAPHNEE, W. D. Y PATEL, V.L. [1987]: Comparing the effects of problembased and conventional curricula in an international sample, Journal of Medical Education, 62 (4): 305-315.
• SPRINGER, C.W. Y FAYE, A. [2004]: Business simulation to stage critical thinking in introductory accounting: rationale, design and implementation, Issues in Accounting Education, 19(3): 227-304.
• TERENZINI, P.T.; CABRERA, A.F.; COLBECK, C.L.; PARENTE, J.M. Y BJORKLUND, S. A. [2001]: Collaborative Learning vs. Lecture/Discussion: Students’ reported learning gains, Journal of Engineering Education, 90: 123-130.
• TONG WU, Y.J.M. [2005]: An empirical test of cooperative learning in a passive learning environment, Issues in Accounting Education, 20 (2): 151-165.
• TREES, A.R. Y JACKSON, M.H. [2007]: The learning environment in clicker classrooms: student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems, Learning, Media and Technology, 32 (1): 21-40.
• TOVIA, F. Y LIU, Y. [2007]: Students evaluating significant factors on retention: a statistical analysis, International Conference on Engineering EducationICEE, September 3-7. Coimbra Portugal, http://icee2007.dei.uc.pt/proceedings/papers/123.pdf
• UHARI, M., RENKO, M. Y SOINI, H. [2003]: Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures, BMC Medical Education, 3 (12): 1-6.
• URQUÍA GRANDE, E.; MUÑOZ COLOMINA, C.I. Y CANO MONTERO, E.I. [2009]: La simulación del cuadro de mando integral. Una herramienta de aprendizaje en la materia de contabilidad de gestión. Documento de trabajo nº 465/2009. Fundación de las Cajas de Ahorro, http://en.scientificcommons.org/51616205
• VERIFICA UCM [2008]: Título de GADE y GECO. Madrid: ANECA.
• VILLARDÓN, L. Y YÁNIZ, C. [2004]: El aprendizaje cooperativo y el nuevo concepto de evaluación, http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:3xW_alG0NhEJ:gi ac.upc.es/pag/giac_cas/giac_jac/04/JAC04- LV.htm+Zabalza,+M.+a.+(2001).+Evaluaci%C3%B3n+de+los+aprendizajes+en+l a+Universidad.&cd=1&hl=es&ct=clnk&gl=es
• VYGOTSKY, L. [1962]: Thought and Language (Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press). WEIL, S.; OYELERE, P.; YEOH, J., Y FIRER, C. [2001]: A study of students perceptions of the usefulness of case studies for the development of finance and accounting related skills y knowledge, Accounting Education, 10(2): 123-146.
• WOOTEN, T. C. [1998]: Factors influencing student learning in introductory Accounting Classes: a comparison of traditional and non-traditional students, Issues in Accounting Education, 13 (2): 357-373.
• YURETICH, R.F.; KHAN, S.A.; LECKIE, R.M. Y CLEMENT, J.J. [2001]: Active-Learning methods to improve student performance y scientific interest in a large introductory Oceanography course, Journal of Geosciences Education, 49, (2): 111-119, http://www.geo.umass.edu/faculty/leckie/Yuretich%20et%20al.%202001%20JG E.pdf.
• ZABALZA, M.A. [2001]: Evaluación de los aprendizajes en la Universidad. En García Valcárcel, A. Didáctica Universitaria (Madrid: La Muralla).