Localización en parques científicos y tecnológicos y cooperación en I+D+i como factores determinantes de la innovación

Referencias bibliográficas

• Baumol, W.J. (2004). Entrepreneurship cultures and countercultures. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3, 316-326.
• Bayona Sáez, C., García Marco, T. y Huerta Arribas, E. (2001). Firms' Motivations for Cooperative R&D: An Empirical Analysis of Spanish Firms. Research Policy, 30, 1289-1307.
• Beugelsdijk, S. (2007). The regional environment and a firm's innovative performance: A plea for a multilevel interactionist approach. Economic Geography, 83, 181-199.
• Becker, W. y Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms - evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33, 209-223.
• Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin B. y Veugelers, R. (2004). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 1237-1263.
• Bellavista, J. y Adán, C. (2009). Los parques científicos y tecnológicos en el desarrollo de la ciencia, la tecnología y la empresa. SEBBM, 161, 6-11.
• Cantù, C. (2010). Exploring the role of spatial relationships to transform knowledge in a business idea - Beyond a geographic proximity. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 887-897.
• Cassiman, B. y Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review, 92, 1169-1184.
• Castro, L.M., Montoro-Sánchez, M.A. y Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M. (2011). Innovation in service industries: Current and future trends. Service Industries Journal, 31, 7-20.
• Chen, S. y Choi, C.J. (2004). Creating a knowledge-based city: The example of Hsinchu science park. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8, 73-82.
• Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating andpProfiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
• Chesbrough, H.W. (2006). Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. En: Chesbrough, H.W., Vanhaverbeke, W. y West, J. (editores). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Christensen, J.L., Rogaczewska, A.P. y Vinding, A.L. (1999). Summary report of the Focus Group on Innovative Firms Network. Disponible en: Http://www.oecd.org/ dataoecd/57/1/2368818.pdf
• Cohen, W.M. y Levinthal, D.A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99, 569-596.
• Colombo, M. y Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31, 1103-1122.
• Coombs, R., Harvey, M. y Tether, B.S. (2003). Analysing distributed processes of provision and innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 1125-1155.
• Cooper, A.C. y Dunkelberg, W.C. (1986). Entrepreneurship and paths to business ownership. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 53-68.
• Debackere, K. y Veugelers, R. (2005). The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34, 321-342.
• Feldman, J.M (2007). The managerial equation and innovation platforms: The case of Linköping and Berzelius science park. European Planning Studies, 15, 1027-1045.
• Felsenstein, D. (1994). University-related Science Parks -"'seedbeds' or 'enclaves' of innovation? Technovation, 14, 93-110.
• Fontana, R., Geuna, A. y Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, 35, 39-323.
• Fukugawa, N. (2006). Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24, 381-400.
• Galende, J. y De la Fuente, J.M. (2003). Internal factors determining a firm's innovative behaviour. Research Policy, 32, 715-736.
• García Muiña, F.E., Pelechano Barahona, E. y Navas López, J.E. (2011). El desarrollo de innovaciones tecnológicas estratégicas: El efecto mediador de la complejidad en el sector de la biotecnología en España. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 20, 35-52.
• Hagedoorn, J. (2002). Inter-firm partnership: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy, 31, 477-492.
• Haeussler, C., Patzelt, H. y Zahra, S.A. (2010). Strategic alliances and product development in high technology new firms: The moderating effect of technological capabilities. Journal of Business Venturing, doi:10.1016/j. jbusvent.2010.10.002.
• IASP (2002). International Association of Science Parks. Dispònible en: Http://www.iasp.ws/
• Ireland, R.D., Hitt, M.A. y Webb, J.W. (2006). Entrepreneurial alliances and networks. En
• Shenkar, J. y Reuer, J.J. (editores). Handbook of strategic alliances. Tousand Oaks: Sage Publishers.
• Jonsson, O. (2002). Innovation processes and proximity: The case of IDEON firms in Lund, Sweden. European Planning Studies, 10, 705-722.
• Laursen, K. y Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131-150.
• Lee W.H. y Yang, W.T. (2000). The cradle of Taiwan high technology industry development-Hsinchu science park. Technovation, 20, 55-59.
• Lindelöf, P. y Löfsten, H. (2003). Science park location and new technology-based firms in Sweden: Implications for strategy and performance. Small Business Economics, 20, 245-258.
• Lindelöf, P. y Löftsen, H. (2004). Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: University-industry links for technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 311-326.
• Link, A.N. y Scott, J.T. (2003). U.S. science parks: The diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic missions of universities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1323-1356.
• Löfsten, H. y Lindelöf, P. (2001). Science parks in Sweden: Industrial renewal and development? R&D Management, 31, 309-322.
• Löfsten, H. y Lindelöf, P. (2002). Science parks and the growth of new technology-based firms: Academic-"industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy, 31, 859-876.
• Löfsten, H. y Lindelöf, P. (2003). Determinants for an entrepreneurial milieu: Science parks and business policy in growing firms. Technovation, 23, 51-64.
• Löfsten, H. y Lindelöf, P. (2005). R&D networks and product innovation patterns-academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on science parks. Technovation, 25, 1025-1037.
• Lööf, H. y Broström, A. (2008). Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness? Journal Technology Transfer, 33, 73-90.
• López, A. (2008). Determinants of R&D cooperation: Evidence form Spanish manufacturing firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 6, 113-136.
• López-Fernández, M.C., Serrano-Bedia, A.M. y García-Piqueres, G. (2008). Exploring determinants of company-university R&D collaboration in Spain. Journal of Manufacturing & Technology Management, 19, 361-373.
• López Fernández, C., Serrano Bedia, A.M. y García Piqueres, G. (2010). Cooperación institucional en I+D+i y patrones de comportamiento empresarial: Evidencia de las empresas manufactureras y de servicios en España. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 19, 7-26.
• Love, J.H. y Roper, S. (1999). The determinants of innovation: R&D, technology transfer and networking effects. Review of Industrial Organizations, 15, 43-64.
• Lumpkin, G.T. y Dess, G.G. (1996). Simplicity as a strategy-making process: The effects of stage of organizational development and environment on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 135-172.
• Malairaja, C. y Zawdie G. (2008). Science parks and university-industry collaboration in Malaysia. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 727-739.
• Martínez Román, J.A., Gamero Rojas, J. y Tamayo Gallego, J.A. (2011). Hacia una tipología empresarial basada en los factores explicativos de la intensidad innovadora: Una aplicación empírica. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 20, 143-160.
• Montalvo, C. (2006). What triggers change and innovation? Technovation, 26, 312-323.
• Montoro-Sánchez, A., Mora-Valentín, E.M. y Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M. (2011). R&D Cooperation in Science and Technology parks: The Advantages of Location. En: Das, T.K. (editor). Strategic Alliances for Value Creation. Estados Unidos: Age Publishing, pp. 73-99.
• Montoro-Sánchez, M.A., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M. y Mora-Valentín, E.M. (2011). Effects of Knowledge Spillovers on Innovation and Collaboration in Science and Technology Parks. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15, 948-970.
• Mu, J., Love, E. y Peng, G. (2008). Interfirm networks, social capital, and knowledge flow. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12, 86-100.
• Narula R. y Santangelo, G.D. (2009). Location, collocation and R&D alliances in the European ICT industry. Research Policy, 38, 393-403.
• Navarro Arancegui, M. (2002). La cooperación para la innovación en la empresa española desde una perspectiva internacional comparada. Economía Industrial, 346, 47-66.
• Nooteboom, B. (1999). Innovation and inter-firm linkages: New implications for policy. Research Policy, 28, 793-805.
• OECD (2002). The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
• OECD (2005). Guidelines for colleting and interpreting innovation data: Oslo Manual. Tercera edición. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) y EURSTAT.
• Ondategui, J.C. (2002). Parques científicos e innovación en España: Quince años de experiencia. Economía Industrial, 346, 147-160.
• Phillimore, J. (1999). Beyond the linear view of innovation in science park evaluation: An analysis of Western Australian technology park. Technovation, 19, 673-680.
• Phan, P., Siegel, D. y Wright, M. (2005). Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 165-182.
• Piga, C. y Vivarelli, M. (2004). Internal and external R&D: A sample selection approach. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66, 457-482.
• Santamaría, L., Nieto, M.J. y Barge-Gil, A. (2010). The relevance of different open innovations strategies for R&D performers. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 45, 93-114.
• Schilling, M.A. y Phelps, C.C. (2007). Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation. Management Science, 53, 1113-1126.
• Simonen, J. y McCann, P. (2008). Innovation, R&D cooperation and labour recruitment: Evidence from Finland. Small Business Economics, 31, 181-194.
• Squicciarini, M. (2008). Science parks' tenants versus out-of-park firms: Who innovates more? A duration model. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 45-71.
• Squicciarini, M. (2009). Science parks, knowledge spillovers, and firms' innovative performance. Evidence from Finland. Economics, The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, Discussion Paper, N. 2009-32, July 9. Disponible en: Http://www. economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2009-32
• Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Tappeiner, G., Hauser, C. y Walde, J. (2008). Regional knowledge spillovers: Fact or artifact? Research Policy, 37, 861-874.
• Teng, B.S. (2007). Corporate entrepreneurship activities through strategic alliances: A resource-based approach toward competitive advantage. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 119-142.
• Tether, B.S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why. An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31, 947-967.
• Un, C.A., Romero-Martínez, A.M. y Montoro-Sánchez, A. (2009). Determinants of R&D collaboration of service firms. Service Business, 3, 373-394.
• Vedovello, C. (1997). Science parks and university-industry interaction: Geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force. Technovation, 17, 491-502.
• Vega-Jurado, J., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A. y Fernández-de-Lucio, I. (2009). Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry. Industrial & Corporate Change, 18, 637-670.
• Vega-Jurado, J., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., Fernández-de-Lucio, I. y Manjarrés-Henríquez, L. (2008). The effect of external and internal factors on firms' product innovation. Research Policy, 37, 616-632.
• Verspagen, B. y De Loo, I. (1999). Technology spillovers between sectors and over time. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 60, 215-235.
• Veugelers, R. y Cassiman, B. (2005). R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23, 355-379.
• Westhead, P. (1997). R&D inputs and outputs of technology-based firms located on and off science parks. R&D Management, 27, 45-62.
• Westhead, P. y Storey, D. (1994). An assessment of firms located on and off science parks in the United Kingdom. London: HMSO.