Adaptación y Validación de la Versión Española de la Escala de Conductas Negativas en el Trabajo Realizadas por AcosadoresNAQ-Perpetrators

  1. Escartín Solanelles, Jordi
  2. Sora Miana, Beatriz
  3. Rodríguez Muñoz, Alfredo
  4. Rodríguez Carballeira, Alvaro
Revista:
Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

ISSN: 1576-5962

Año de publicación: 2012

Volumen: 28

Número: 3

Páginas: 157-170

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5093/TR2012A13 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

Resumen

Este artículo presenta una adaptación del cuestionario de desempeño cívico de Coleman y Borman (2000) y un análisis de su estructura empírica. Una vez traducido y adaptado, el cuestionario se aplicó a una muestra de 135 empleados públicos de una unidad completa del Gobierno Autonómico de Canarias. Los resultados indican que el cuestionario tiene una alta consistencia interna, aunque parece medir tres dimensiones relacionadas entre sí. Dos de estas dimensiones son altamente estables y coinciden con las propuestas por LePine, Erez y Johnson (2002), Cumplimiento Generalizado y Altruismo, mientras que la tercera es de difícil interpretación. Un análisis factorial de segundo orden indica que existe una única dimensión subyacente de desempeño cívico. Estos resultados tienen implicaciones teóricas y prácticas que ayudan a la interpretación y diagnóstico del dominio.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • APA, AERA y NCME (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Aquino, K. y Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target's perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717-741.
  • Avolio, B., Bass, B. y Jung, D. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 72, 441-462.
  • Baillien, E., De Cuyper, N. y De Witte, H. (2011). Job autonomy and workload as antecedents of workplace bullying: a two-wave test of Karasek's Job Demand Control model for targets and perpetrators. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 191-208.
  • Baillien, E., Neyens, I., De Witte, H. y De Cuyper, N. (2009). A qualitative study on the development of workplace bullying: Towards a three way model. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1-16.
  • Baillien, E., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Van den Broeck, A. y De Witte, H. (2011). Do demands and resources affect target's and perpetrators' reports of workplace bullying? A two-wave cross-lagged study. Work and Stress, 25, 128-146.
  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Browne, M. y Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230-258.
  • Ceja, L., Escartín, J. y Rodríguez-Carballeira, A. (2012). Organizational contexts that foster positive behaviour and well-being: A comparison between family-owned firms and non-family businesses. Revista de Psicología Social, 27, 69-84.
  • Cemaloglu, N. (2011). Primary principals' leadership styles, school organizational health and workplace bullying. Journal of Educational Administration, 49, 495-512.
  • Clark, L. A. y Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319.
  • Comrey, L. y Lee, H. (1992). A First Course in Factor Analysis (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cortina, J. M. (1993). Interaction, nonlinearity, and multicollinearity: Implications for multiple regression. Journal of Management, 19, 915-922.
  • Coyne, I., Smith-Lee Chong, P., Seigne, E. y Randall, P. (2003). Self and peer nominations of bullying. An analysis of incident rates, individual differences and perceptions of the working environment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 209-228.
  • De Cuyper, N., Baillien, E. y DeWitte, H. (2009). Job insecurity, perceived employability and targets and perpetrators experiences of workplace bullying. Work and Stress, 23, 206-224.
  • Einarsen, S. y Hauge, L. J. (2006). Antecedentes y consecuencias del acoso psicológico en el trabajo: una revisión de la literatura. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 22, 251-274.
  • Einarsen, S. y Hoel, H. (2001). The Negative Acts Questionnaire: Development, validation and revision of a measure of bullying at work. 10th European Congress on Work and Organizational Psychology, 16-19 May 2001, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H. y Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work and Stress, 21, 24-44.
  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., y Cooper, C. L. (Eds.) (2011). The concept of bullying and harassment at work: The European tradition. En S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Workplace bullying: Developments in theory, research and practice (pp. 3-40). London & New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Einarsen, S. y Raknes. B. I. (1997). Harassment at work and the vicimization of men. Victims and Violence, 12, 247-263.
  • Escartín, J., Salin, D. y Rodríguez-Carballeira, A. (2011). Conceptualizations of workplace bullying: gendered rather than gender-neutral? Journal of Personnel Psychology, 10, 157-165.
  • Escartín, J., Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Gómez-Benito, J. y Zapf, D. (2010). Development and validation of the Workplace Bullying Scale "EAPA-T." International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10, 519-539.
  • Escartín, J., Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Zapf, D., Porrúa, C. y Martín-Peña, J. (2009). Perceived severity of various bullying behaviours at work and the relevance of exposure to bullying. Work and Stress, 23, 191-205.
  • Escartín, J., Rodríguez-Carballeira, A. y Zapf, D. (2012). Mobbing o acoso psicológico en el trabajo. Editorial Síntesis: Madrid.
  • Escartín, J., Ullrich, J., Zapf, D., Schlüter, E. y Van Dick, R. (2012). Individual and Group Level Effects of Social Identification of Workplace Bullying. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 1-21.
  • Escartín, J., Zapf, D., Arrieta, C. y Rodríguez- Carballeira, A. (2011). Workers perception of workplace bullying: A cross-cultural study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 178-205.
  • Fergusson, M. y Barry, B. (2011). I know what you did: The effects of interpersonal deviance on bystanders. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 80-94.
  • Ford, J. K., MacCallum, R. C. y Tait, M. (1986). The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39, 291-314.
  • García-Cueto, E., Gallo, P. y Miranda, R. (1998). Bondad de ajuste en el análisis factorial confirmatorio. Psicothema, 10, 717-724.
  • Glomb, T. M. y Liao, H. (2003). Interpersonal aggression in work groups: Social influence, reciprocal, and individual effects. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 486-496.
  • Hauge, L. J., Skogstad, A. y Einarsen, S. (2007). Relationships between stressful work environments and bullying: Results of a large representative study. Work & Stress, 21, 220-242.
  • Hauge, L. J., Skogstad, A. y Einarsen, S. (2009). Individual and situational predictors of workplace bullying: Why do perpetrators engage in the bullying of others? Work & Stress, 23, 349-358.
  • Hauge, L. J., Skogstad, A. y Einarsen, S. (2010). The relative impact of workplace bullying as a social stressor at work. Personality and Social Sciences, 51, 426-433.
  • Heinberg, L. J., Thompson, J. K. y Stormer, S. (1995). Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 17, 81-89.
  • Hershcovis, M. S. y Barling, J. (2010). Towards a multi-foci approach to workplace aggression: A meta-analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 24-44.
  • Hoel, H., Glaso, L., Hetland, J., Cooper, C. y Einarsen, S. (2010). Leadership styles as predictors of self-reported and observed workplace bullying. British Journal of Management, 21, 453-468.
  • Hoel, H., Sheehan, M., Cooper, C. L. y Einarsen, S. (2011). Organizational effects of workplace bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf y C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Workplace bullying: Developments in theory, research and practice (pp. 129-147). London & New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Jenkins, M. F., Zapf, D., Winefield, H. y Sarris, A. (2012). Bullying Allegations from the Accused Bully's Perspective. British Journal of Management, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00778.x.
  • Jöreskog, K. G. y Sörbom, D. (1993). Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.
  • Jöreskog, K., Sörbom, D. y du Toit, S. (2007). LISREL 8.8. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
  • Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modelling: Foundations and extensions. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Keashly, L. y Jagatic, K. (2011). North American perspectives on hostile behaviors and bullying at work. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel y D. Zapf (Eds.). Workplace bullying and harassment: Developments in theory, research and practice. (pp. 41-74) London, UK: Taylor Francis.
  • Keashly, L. y Nowell, B. L. (2011). Workplace bullying, conflict and conflict resolution. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel y D. Zapf (Eds.). Workplace bullying and harassment: Developments in theory, research and practice. (pp. 423-455). London, UK: Taylor Francis.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (2rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Kotlyar, I. y Karakowsky, L. (2007). Falling over ourselves to follow the leader: Conceptualizing connections between transformational leader behaviors and dysfunctional team conflict. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 14, 38-49.
  • Leiter, M. P., Spence-Laschinger, H. K., Day, A. y Gilin-Oore, D. (2011). The impact of incivility interventions on employee social behavior, distress, and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1258-1274.
  • Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence and Victims, 5, 119-126.
  • Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 165-184.
  • Matthiesen, S. B. y Einarsen, S. (2007). Perpetrators and targets of bullying at work: role stress and individual differences. Violence and Victims, 22, 735-753.
  • Moreno-Jimenez, B., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Martínez, M. y Gálvez, M. (2007). Assessing workplace bullying: Spanish validation of a reduced version of the negative acts questionnaire. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 449-457.
  • Moreno-Jiménez, B., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Salin, D. y Morante, M. (2008). Workplace bullying in southern Europe: Prevalence, forms and risk groups in a Spanish sample. International Journal of Organizational Behaviour 13, 95-109.
  • Nielsen, M. B., Matthiesen, S. B. y Einarsen, S. (2010). The impact of methodological moderators on prevalence rates of workplace bullying. A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 955-979.
  • Nielsen, Notelaers, G. y Einarsen, S. (2011). Measuring Exposure to Workplace Bullying. En S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf y C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Workplace bullying: Development in theory, research and practice (pp. 149-177). London & New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Norman, G. R. y Streiner, D. L. (1994). Biostatistics: the Bare Essentials. St.Louis: Mosby.
  • Notelaers, G. y Einarsen, S. (2008). The construction and validation of the Short-Negative Acts Questionnaire. Comunicación en 6th International Conference on Workplace Bullying, 4-6 Junio, Montreal, Canada.
  • Nunnally, J. C. y Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Parkins, I. S., Fishbein, H. D. y Ritchey, P. N. (2006). The influence of personality on workplace bullying and discrimination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2554-2577.
  • Parzefall, M. y Salin, D. (2010) Perceptions of and reactions to workplace bullying: a social exchange perspective. Human Relations, 63, 761-780.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B. y Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources/causes of common method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569.
  • Rayner, C. (1997). The incidence of workplace bullying. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 7, 199-208.
  • Rayner, C. y Cooper, C. L. (2003). The black hole in "bullying at work research". International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 4, 47-64.
  • Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Moreno-Jiménez, B., Baillien, E., Sanz-Vergel, A. I. y Moreno, Y. (2012). Agredidos que agreden: la relación recíproca entre víctima y agresor en situaciones de acoso psicológico en el trabajo. Psicothema, 24, 358-363.
  • Salin, D. (2008). The prevention of workplace bullying as a question of human resource management issue: measures adopted and underlying organizational factors. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24, 221-231.
  • Salin, D. y Hoel, H. (2011). Organizational causes of workplace bullying. En S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf y C. L. Cooper (Eds). Workplace Bullying: Developments in Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 227-243). London. Taylor & Francis.
  • Sanz-Vergel, A. y Rodríguez-Muñoz, A. (2011). El Efecto del Acoso Psicológico en el Trabajo sobre la Salud: El Papel Mediador del Conflicto Trabajo-Familia. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 27, 93-102.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. y Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23-74.
  • Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings, Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 3-43). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
  • Simons, S. R., Stark, R. B. y DeMarco, R. F. (2011). A new, four-item instrument to measure workplace bullying. Research in Nursing & Health, 34, 132-140.
  • Skogstad, A., Torsheim, T., Einarsen, S. y Hauge, L. J. (2011). Testing the Work Environment Hypothesis of Bullying on a Group Level of Analysis: Psychosocial Factors as Precursors of Observed Workplace Bullying. Applied Psychology: An international review, 60, 475-495.
  • Spector, P. E. y Fox, S. (2005). The stressor-emotion model of counterproductive work behavior (CWB). In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Stouten, J., Baillien, E., Van den Broeck, A., Camps, J., De Witte, H, y Euwema, M. (2010). Discouraging bullying: the role of ethical leadershipt and its effects on the work environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 17-27.
  • Streiner, D. L. y Norman, G. R. (1995). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Vartia, M. y Leka, S. (2011). Interventions for the prevention and management of bullying at work. En S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf y C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Workplace bullying: Development in theory, research and practice (pp. 359-380). London & New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Zapf, D. y Einarsen, S. (2011). Individual Antecedents of Bullying: Victims and Perpetrators. En S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf y C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Workplace bullying: Development in theory, research and practice (pp. 177-200). London & New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Zapf, D., Escartín, J., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H. y Vartia, M. (2011). Empirical findings on prevalence and risk groups of bullying in the workplace. En S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf y C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Workplace bullying: Developments in theory, research and practice (pp. 75-105). London & New York: Taylor & Francis.