The expression of stereotypes of criminals and human rights defendersA comparative study

  1. Pereira, Marcos Emanoel
  2. Álvaro Estramiana, José Luis
  3. Machado, Daiane
  4. Dantas, Gilcimar
  5. Modesto, Joao G. N.
  6. Alves, Marcus V. C.
  7. Canario-Gomes, Natália
Aldizkaria:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728,  1695-2294

Argitalpen urtea: 2013

Alea: 29

Zenbakia: 2

Orrialdeak: 565-572

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Anales de psicología

Laburpena

The present study aimed to evaluate, between Brazilian and Spanish participants, the stereotypes of criminals and human rights de-fenders, and the extent to which this assessment is affected by the type of crime and the implicit theories adopted to explain criminal behavior. Even though the results indicated differences in the attribution of stereotypes to criminals and human rights defenders, it was not possible to identify any effect on the expression of stereotypes from the type of crime or the im-plicit theories. Although a certain homogeneity in the stereotypes of crimi-nals can be demonstrated, in the case of human rights defenders the stereo-typical representation is more complex and contradictory.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Allport, G. (1962). La naturaleza del prejuicio. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.
  • Bargh, J., & Chartrand, T. (2000). The mind in the middle: a practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. Reis & C. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in Social and Personality Psychology (pp. 253-285). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Betancourt, V., Rodríguez, A., Quiles, M., & Rodríguez, T. (2005). Relación de la infrahumanización del exogrupo con los procesos de inferencia y memoria. Psicothema, 17(3), 447-452.
  • Blair, I., & Banaji, M. (1996). Automatic and controled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1142-1163.
  • Bodenhausen, G. (1980). Stereotypes as judgemental heuristics: evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1, 319-322.
  • Brigham, J. (1971). Ethnic stereotypes. Psychological Bulletin, 76(1), 15-38.
  • Bussche, E. V., Noortgate, W. V., & Reynvoet, B. (2009). Mechanisms of masked priming: a metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 135(3), 452-477.
  • Dasgupta, N. (2009). Mechanisms underlying the malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. The role of automaticity and cognitive control. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 61-87). New York: Psychology Press.
  • Devine, P. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
  • Devine, P., & Elliot, A. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 22-37.
  • Estrada, C., Oyarzún, M., & Yzerbyt, V. (2007). Teorías implícitas y esencialismo psicológico: herramientas conceptuales para el estudio de las relaciones entre y dentro de los grupos. Psykhe, 16(1), 111-122.
  • Fazio, R., & Olson, M. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
  • Fiske, S. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske & G. Lindzey. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 357-411). Boston, Ma: McGraw-Hill.
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
  • Greenwald, A., & Banaji, M. (1995). Implicit social cognition: attitudes, selfesteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27.
  • Hamilton, D., Stroessner, S., & Driscoll, D. (1994). Social cognition and the study of stereotyping. In P. Devine, D. Hamilton & T. M. Ostron (Eds.), Social cognition: impact on social psychology. (pp. 291-321). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Haslam, N. (1998). Natural kinds, human kinds, and essentialism. Social Research, 65(2), 1-10.
  • Haslam, N., Bain, P., Douge, L., Lee, M., & Bastian, B. (2005). More human than you: attributing humanness to self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 937-950.
  • Hilton, J., & Von Hippel, W. (1996). Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 237-271.
  • Karlins, M., Coffman, T. L., & Walters, G. (1969). On the fading of social stereotypes: studies in three generations of college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 1-16.
  • Informe Ministerio de Sanidad, Política Social e Igualdad (2010). Víctimas mundiales por violencia de género. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad, Política Social e Igualdad.
  • Katz, D., & Braly, K. (1933). Racial stereotypes in one hundred college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 280-290.
  • Keller, J. (2005). In genes we trust: the biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 686-702.
  • Kruger, H. (2004). Introdução à Psicologia Social. São Paulo: EPU.
  • Lee, Y., Jussim, L., & McCauley, C. (1995). Stereotype accuracy. Toward appreciating group differences. Washington: APA.
  • Leyens, J-P., Yzerbyt, V., & Schadron, G. (1994). Stereotypes and social cognition. London: Sage.
  • Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2001). Elements of a lay theory of groups: Types of groups, relational styles, and the perception of group entitativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 129-140.
  • Macrae, C., & Bodenhausen, G. (2000). Social cognition: thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 93-120.
  • Malle, B. (1999). How people explain behavior: a new theoretical framework. Personality and Psychology Social Review, 3, 23-48.
  • Malle, B. (2006). How the mind explains behavior. Folk explanations, meaning and social interactions. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • Olson, M. A. (2009). Measures of prejudice. In T. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 367-386). New York: Psychology Press.
  • Pereira, M. (2002). Psicologia Social dos Estereótipos. São Paulo: EPU.
  • Pereira, M., Martins, A., Cupertino, C., & Ferreira, F. (2002). Imagens, significado e o processamento dos estereótipos. Estudos de Psicologia, 7(2), 389-397.
  • Waiselfisz, J. J. (2010). Anatomia dos homicídios no Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Instituto Sangari.
  • Wegner, D., & Bargh, J. (1998). Control and automaticity in social life. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 446-496). Boston, Ma: McGraw-Hill.
  • Yzerbyt, V., & Rocher, S. (2002). Subjective essentialism and the emergence of stereotypes. In C. McGarty, V. Yzerbyt & R. Spears (Eds.), Stereotypes as explanations (pp. 38-66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yzerbyt, V., Judd, C., & Corneille, O. (2004). The psychology of group perception: perceived variability, entitativity and essentialism. New York: Psychology Press
  • Yzerbyt, V., Rocher, S., & Schadron, G. (1997). Stereotype as explanations: a subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In R. Spears, P. Oakes, N. Ellemers & A. Haslam (Eds.), The Psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 20-50). London: Basil Blackwell.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet