An impure public good model with lotteries in large groups

  1. Cabrales Goitia, Antonio
  2. Lugo, Haydeé
Revista:
Documentos de Trabajo (ICAE)

ISSN: 2341-2356

Año de publicación: 2011

Número: 5

Páginas: 1-14

Tipo: Documento de Trabajo

Otras publicaciones en: Documentos de Trabajo (ICAE)

Resumen

We analyze the effect of a large group on an impure public goods model with lotteries. We show that as populations get large, and with selfish preferences, the level of contributions converges to the one given by voluntary contributions. With altruistic preferences (of the warm glow type), the contributions converge to a level strictly higher than those given by voluntary contributions, even though in general they do not yield first-best levels.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Andreoni, J. (1989): “Giving with impure altruism: applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence,” Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458.
  • Andreoni, J. (1990): “Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving?,” Economic Journal, 100(4), 464–477.
  • Bergstrom, T., L. Blume, and H. Varian(1986): “OnthePrivateProvision of Public Goods,” Journal of Public Economics, 29, 25–49.
  • Bergstrom, T., and R. Cornes (1983): “Independence of allocative efficiency from distribution in the theory of public goods,” Econometrica, 51(6), 1753–1765.
  • Borg, M. O., and P. M. Mason (1988): “The Budgetary Incidence of a Lottery to Support Education,” National Tax Journal, 61, 75–85.
  • Borg, M. O., P. M. Mason, and S. L. Shapiro (1991): The economic consequences of state lotteries. Praeger Press, New York, NY.
  • Buchanan, J. (1963): “The Economics of Earmarked Taxes,” Journal of Political Economy, 71, 457–469.
  • Clotfelter, C. T., and P. P. Cook (1989): Selling hope, State lotteries in America. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Morgan, J. (2000): “Financing public goods by means of lotteries,” The Review of Economic Studies, 67(4), 761–784.
  • Temimi, A. (2001): “Does altruism mitigate free-riding and welfare loss?,” Economics Bulletin, 8(5), 1–8.