El "cierre" del estrecho de Ormuzun análisis desde el derecho internacional

  1. López Martín, Ana Gemma
Aldizkaria:
Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI)

ISSN: 1697-5197

Argitalpen urtea: 2013

Zenbakia: 25

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI)

Laburpena

In recent years, the Islamic Republic of Iran is threatening a possible closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which is a coastal State. Concern about the negative effects that could lead the closure, especially from the economic point of view, given that is the strait with greater traffic of oil in the world, leads us to analyze whether the closure would be legitimate. We wonder if from the point of view of International Law Iran has the right to close the Strait of Hormuz or, where appropriate, to impose passage rates. An analysis that focuses mainly on the rules of the Law of Sea concerning the international straits, not to mention some aspects of international responsibility, as is the score on the possible closure as a countermeasure against the sanctions imposed by the United States of America and some States of the European Union.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Arteaga, F., y Escribano, G., “Irán y el cierre del Estrecho de Ormuz: analizando los riesgos militares y energéticos”, Real Instituto Elcano, ARI 5/2012, p.6
  • BAXTER, R.R. “Passage of Ships Through International Waterways in Time of War”, BYBIL, 1954, pp.187-202.
  • BOU FRANCH, V., La navegación por el mar territorial, incluidos los estrechos internacionales y las aguas archipelágicas en tiempos de paz, Madrid, 1994, p.84
  • BRÜEL, E., International Straits. A Treatise on International Law, London, 1947, pp.15-17
  • BURKE, W.T., “Submerged Passage through Straits: Interpretations of the proposed Law of the Sea Treaty Text”, Washington Law Review, 52, 1976-1977, pp.195-196.
  • CAMINOS, H., “The Legal Regime of Straits in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea”, R. des C., nº 295, 1987-V, pp.141-142.
  • CAMINOS, H., and MOLITOR, M.R., “Progressive Development of International Law and the Package Deal”, AJIL, 1985, p.887.
  • ESPALIÚ BERDUD, C., y CASADO RAIGÓN, R., “El paso inocente de buques de guerra extranjeros por mar territorial: alcance del régimen de la CNUDM”, REDI, 2005.2, vol. LVII, pp.777-798.
  • FIGG, Robert K., and WILSON, Danielle A. (eds.), U. S. led sanctions on Iran, New York, Nova Science, 2012
  • FORNARI, M.,” La navegación por los estrechos entre disciplina convencional y práctica de los Estados”, Cuadernos Jurídicos, nº 2, p.26
  • GHOSH, Sh., “The Legal Regime of Innocent Passage through the Territorial Sea”, Indian Journal of International Law, 1980, pp.216-235
  • HYDE, International Law, Chiefly as interpreted and applied by the United States, 1945, p.487.
  • INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC ORGANIZATION, A Manual on Technical Aspects of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982, 4ª ed., Monaco, 2006, pa.94.
  • JEANEL, R., “Les grands compromis de la Conférence”, en SFDI, Perspectives du droit de la mer à l’issue de la 3ª Conférence des Nations Unies. Colloque de Rouen, Pedone, Paris, 1984
  • KIESBYE, Stefan (ed.), Is Iran a threat to global security?, Greenhaven Press, 2010
  • LÓPEZ MARTÍN, A.G., La navegación por los estrechos. Geoestrategia y Derecho, Dykinson, Madrid, 2008, pp.93-99.
  • LUCCHINI, L., et VOELCKEL, M., Droit de la Mer, Tome 2, Vol.2, Pedone, Paris, 1996, p.249.
  • MOORE, J.N., “The Regime of Straits and the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea”, AJIL, 1980, p.112.
  • NGANTCHA, F., The Right of Innocent Passage and the Evolution of the International Law of the Sea, Pinter Publishers, London, 1990
  • O’CONNELL, The International Law of the Sea, vol.I, Oxford, 1984, p.274; trabajo al que remitimos para una análisis de la evolución histórica, tanto de la discusión doctrinal, como de la práctica estatal al respecto (pp.274-294)
  • PASTOR RIDRUEJO, J.A., “La Convención de 1982 sobre el Derecho del Mar y los intereses de España”, Cursos de Derecho Internacional de Vitoria-Gasteiz, 1983, p.78.
  • PHARAND, D., “International Straits”, en Thesaurus Acroasium, 7, 1977, p.82.
  • POSCH, W., “The EU and Iran”, en BISCOP, Sven and WHITMAN, Richard G. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of European security, London, Routledge, 2013, pp.179-188.
  • PRATT, L.J., The Physical Oceanography of Sea Straits, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1990, p.373
  • PRZETACZNIK, F., “Freedom of navigation through territorial sea and international straits”, Revue de Droit International des sciences diplomatiques et politiques, 1977.3, pp.222-236.
  • REISMAN, M., “The Regime of Straits and National Security: an Appraisal of International Lawmaking”, AJIL, 1980, p.72.
  • SCOVAZZI, T., “Management regimes and responsability for international straits with special reference to the Mediterranean straits”, Marine Policy, 1995.2, p.138.
  • SCOVAZZI, T., “Management regimes and responsability for international straits. With special reference to the Mediterranean Straits”, Marine Policy, 1995.2., pp.149-150
  • TREVES, T., “La navegation”, en DUPUY, R.J., et VIGNES, D., Traité du nouveau droit de la mer, Paris, 1985, pp.757-758.
  • WÄHLISCH, M., “The Iran-U.S. Dispute, the Strait of Hormuz, and International Law”, The Yale Journal of International Law Online, vol.37 (spring 2012), p.27
  • WESTLAKE, J., International Law, vol.I, London, 1904, p.193.
  • YTURRIAGA BARBERÁN J.A., Ámbitos de soberanía en la Convención de Naciones Unidas sobre Derecho del Mar. Una perspectiva española, Madrid, 1993, p.254.
  • YTURRIAGA BARBERÁN, J.A., “El sobrevuelo por los estrechos internacionales utilizados para la navegación internacional”, Anuario IHLADI, vol.9, 1991, pp.362-363.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet