Paradigmas de investigaciones de los sesgos atencionales en la ansiedadUna revisión teórica

  1. Ramos Cejudo, Juan
  2. Schmitz, Florian
Revista:
Ansiedad y estrés

ISSN: 1134-7937

Año de publicación: 2013

Volumen: 19

Número: 2-3

Páginas: 243-261

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Ansiedad y estrés

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Algom, D., Chajut, E., & Lev, S. (2004). A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(3), 323-338.
  • Amir, N., Beard, C., & Bower, E. (2005). Interpretation bias and social anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29(4), 433-443.
  • Ansari, T. L., Derakshan, N., & Richards, A. (2008). Effects of anxiety on task switching: Evidence from the mixed antisaccade task. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(3), 229-238.
  • Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 1-24.
  • Barlow, D. H. (2002). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic (2 ed). New York: Guilford.
  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A atudy in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Calvo, M. G., Avero, P., Castillo, M., & Miguel-Tobal, J. J. (2003). Multidimensional anxiety and content-specificity effects in preferential processing of threat. European Psychologist, 8(4), 252-265.
  • Casey, B., Getz, S., & Galvan, A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Developmental Review, 28(1), 62-77.
  • Chen, E., & Craske, M. G. (1998). Risk perceptions and interpretations of ambiguity related to anxiety during a stressful event. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 137-148.
  • Cisler, J. M., Bacon, A. K., & Williams, N. L. (2009). Phenomenological characteristics of attentional biases towards threat: A critical review. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33(2), 221-234.
  • Cisler, J. M., & Koster, E. H. W. (2010). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 203-216.
  • Cohen, J. D., Aston-Jones, G., & Gilzenrat, M. S. (2004). A systems level theory of attention and cognitive control. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 71-90). New York: Guilford.
  • Conrey, F. R., Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Hugenberg, K., & Groom, C. J. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 469-487.
  • Derakshan, N., & Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance: New developments from attentional control theory. European Psychologist, 14(2), 168-176.
  • Dunning, J. P., & Hajack, G. (2009). See no evil: Directing visual attention within unpleasant images modulates the electrocortical response. Psychophysiology, 46(1), 28-33.
  • Eysenck, M. W. (1992). Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; England.
  • Eysenck, M. W. (1997). Anxiety and cognition: A unified theory. Hove, England: Psychology Press/Erlbaum (UK) Taylor & Francis; England.
  • Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6(6), 409-434.
  • Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336-353.
  • Eysenck, M. W., & Eysenck, W. (2007). Four-factor theory and the anxiety disorders. Ansiedad y Estrés, 13, 283-289.
  • Foa, E. B., Feske, U., Murdock, T. B., Kozak, M. J., & McCarthy, P. R. (1991). Processing of threat-related information in rape victims. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(2), 156-162.
  • Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1986). Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information. Psychological Bulletin, 99(1), 20-35.
  • Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 681-700.
  • Fox, E., Russo, R., & Dutton, K. (2002). Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cognition and Emotion, 16(3), 355-379.
  • Frewen, P. A., Dozois, D. J., Joanisse, M. F., & Neufeld, R. W. (2008). Selective attention to threat versus reward: Meta-analysis and neural-network modeling of the dot-probe task. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(2), 307-337.
  • Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 101-135.
  • Gladwin, T. E., Figner, B., Crone, E. A., & Wiers, R. W. (2011). Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(4), 364-376.
  • Green, M., Elliman, N. A., & Rogers, P. J. (1995). Lack of effect of short-term fasting on cognitive function. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 29, 245-253.
  • Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271-299.
  • Gross, J. J. (2013). Emotion regulation: Taking stock and moving forward. Emotion, 13(3), 359-365.
  • Johnson, D. R. (2009). Goal-directed attentional deployment to emotional faces and individual differences in emotional regulation. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 8-13.
  • Klauer, K. C., Schmitz, F., Teige-Mocigemba, S., & Voss, A. (2010). Understanding the role of executive control in the implicit association test: Why flexible people have small IAT effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(3), 595-619. doi:10.1080/17470210903076826
  • Klauer, K. C., Voss, A., Schmitz, F., & Teige-Mocigemba, S. (2007). Process components of the Implicit Association Test: A diffusion-model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 353-368. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.353
  • Koole, S. L. (2009). The psychology of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Cognition and Emotion, 23(1), 4-41.
  • Kornblum, S., & Lee, J.-W. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(4), 855-875.
  • Koster, E. H., Crombez, G., Van Damme, S., Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2004). Does imminent threat capture and hold attention? Emotion, 4, 312-317.
  • Koster, E. H., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2004). Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm: Differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(10), 1183-1192.
  • Koster, E. H., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., Van Damme, S., & Wiersema, J. R. (2006). Components of attentional bias to threat in high trait anxiety: Facilitated engagement, impaired disengagement, and attentional avoidance. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(12), 1757-1771.
  • Koster, E. H., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., Vanvolsem, P., & De Houwer, J. (2007). A time-course analysis of attentional cueing by threatening scenes. Experimental Psychology, 54(2), 161-171.
  • Koster, E. H., Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., & Van Damme, S. (2005). Time-course of attention for threatening pictures in high and low trait anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43(8), 1087-1098.
  • Lang, P. J. (1995). The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist, 50(5), 372-385.
  • Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley: Statistical theories of mental test scores, with contributions by Allan Birnbaum.
  • MacLeod, C., & Hagan, R. (1992). Individual differences in the selective processing of threatening information, and emotional responses to a stressful life event. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 30, 151-161.
  • MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1988). Anxiety and the allocation of attention to threat. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 653-670.
  • MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1991). Biased cognitive operations in anxiety: Accessibility of information or assignment of processing priorities. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29(6), 599-610.
  • MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95(1), 15-20.
  • MacLeod, C., & Rutherford, E. M. (1992). Anxiety and the selective processing of emotional information: mediating roles of awareness, trait and state variables, and personal relevance of stimulus materials. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 30, 479-491.
  • Martin, M., Williams, R. M., & Clark, D. M. (1991). Does anxiety lead to selective processing of threat-related information? Behavioral Research and Therapy, 29, 147-160.
  • Mathews, A., & Klug, F. (1993). Emotionality and interference with color-naming in anxiety. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 31, 57-62.
  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1985). Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23(5), 563-569.
  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1994). Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 25-50.
  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2005). Cognitive Vulnerability To Emotional Disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1(1), 167-195.
  • Mathews, A., May, J., Mogg, K., & Eysenck, M. (1990). Attentional bias in anxiety: Selective search or defective filtering? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99(2), 166-173.
  • Matthews, G., & Wells, A. (2000). Attention, automaticity, and affective disorder. Behavior Modification, 24(1), 69-93.
  • McNally, R. J., Amir, N., Louro, C. E., Lukach, B. M., Riemann, B. C., & Calamari, J. E. (1994). Cognitive processing of idiographic emotional information in panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32(1), 119-122.
  • Miltner, W. H., Krieschel, S., Hecht, H., Trippe, R., & Weiss, T. (2004). Eye movements and behavioral responses to threatening and nonthreatening stimuli during visual search in phobic and nonphobic subjects. Emotion, 4(4), 323-339.
  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex 'frontal lobe' task: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49-100.
  • Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1998). A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(9), 809-848.
  • Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Dixon, C., Fisher, S., Twelftree, H., & McWilliams, A. (2000). Trait anxiety, defensiveness and selective processing of threat: An investigation using two measures of attentional bias. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(6), 1063-1077.
  • Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., & Hallowell, N. (1994). Attentional bias to threat: roles of trait anxiety, stressful events, and awareness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 841-864.
  • Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Miles, F., & Dixon, R. (2004). Time course of attentional bias for threat scenes: Testing the vigilance-avoidance hypothesis. Cognition and Emotion, 18(5), 689-700.
  • Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., & Williams, R. (1995). Attentional bias in anxiety and depression: the role of awareness. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34, 17-36.
  • Mogg, K., Mathews, A., Bird, C., & Macgregor-Morris, R. (1990). Effects of stress and anxiety on the processing of threat stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1230-1237.
  • Mogg, K., Mathews, A., Eysenck, M., & May, J. (1991). Biased cognitive operations in anxiety: Artefact, processing priorities or attentional search? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29(5), 459-467.
  • Monsell, S., Taylor, T. J., & Murphy, K. (2001). Naming the color of a word: Is it responses or task sets that compete? Memory & Cognition, 29(1), 137-151.
  • Moratti, S., & Keil, A. (2009). Not what you expect: Experience but not expectancy predicts conditioned responses in human visual and supplementary cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 19(12), 2803-2809.
  • Nigg, J. T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 220-246.
  • Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1980). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), Cognitive Neuroscience: A Reader Blackwell.
  • Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 466-478.
  • Ouimet, A. J., Gawronski, B., & Dozois, D. J. (2009). Cognitive vulnerability to anxiety: A review and an integrative model. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(6), 459-470.
  • Pacheco-Unguetti, A. P., Acosta, A., Callejas, A., & Lupianez, J. (2010). Attention and anxiety: Different attentional functioning under state and trait anxiety. Psychological Science, 21(2), 298-304.
  • Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3-25.
  • Ramos-Cejudo, J. (2011). El efecto del estrés y del rasgo de ansiedad en el procesamiento de la información amenazante: un estudio experimental basado en el sesgo atencional [The effect of stress and trait anxiety on the processing of threatening information: An experimental study based on attentional bias]. Doctoral Thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid.
  • Ramos-Cejudo, J., Salguero, J. M., & Cano-Vindel, A. (in press). The Spanish version of the meta-cognitions questionnaire 30 (MCQ-30). The Spanish Journal of Psychology.
  • Richards, A., French, C. C., Johnson, W., Naparstek, J., & Williams, J. M. G. (1992). Effects of mood manipulation and anxiety on performance of an emotional Stroop task. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 479-491.
  • Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2006). Spider fearful individuals attend to threat, then quickly avoid it: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(2), 231-238.
  • Rinck, M., Becker, E. S., Kellermann, J., & Roth, W. T. (2003). Selective attention in anxiety: Distraction and enhancement in visual search. Depression and Anxiety, 18(1), 18-28.
  • Rohner, J.-C. (2002). The time-course of visual threat processing: High trait anxious individuals eventually avert their gaze from angry faces. Cognition and Emotion, 16(6), 837-844.
  • Sheppes, G., & Meiran, N. (2008). Divergent cognitive costs for online forms of reappraisal and distraction. Emotion, 8(6), 870-874.
  • Spreng, R. A. (1994). A reassessment of the reliability of difference scores in the measurement of disconfirmation of expectations. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction, and Complaining Behavior, 7, 114-118.
  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643-662.
  • Tata, P. R., Leibowitz, J. A., Prunty, M. J., Cameron, M., & Pickering, A. D. (1996). Attentional bias in obsessional compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34(1), 53-60.
  • Van Damme, S., Crombez, G., Hermans, D., Koster, E. H., & Eccleston, C. (2006). The role of extinction and reinstatement in attentional bias to threat: A conditioning approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1555-1563.
  • Watts, F. N., McKenna, F. P., Sharrock, R., & Trezise, L. (1986). Colour naming of phobia-related words. British Journal of Psychology, 77(1), 97-108.
  • Wells, A. (2000). Emotional disorders and metacognition: Innovative cognitive therapy. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; US.
  • Wells, A., & Matthews, G. (1994). Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; England.
  • Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (2 ed.). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons; England.
  • Wilson, M. R., Vine, S. J., & Wood, G. (2009). The influence of anxiety on visual attentional control in basketball free throw shooting. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 31(2), 152-168.