Validez factorial y fiabilidad de la "Escala de tácticas para el conflicto revisada" (Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, CTS2) en población adulta española

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adams, B. N. (1965). Coercion and consensus theories: some unresolved issues. American Journal of Sociology, 71, 74-716.
• Andreu, J. M. y Peña, M. E. (2012). Identifying psychometrically different types of non-direct aggression in a Spanish Population. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 1-7.
• Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a metaanalytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-680.
• Bernard, M. L. y Bernard, J. L. (1983). Violent intimacy: the family as a model for love relationships. Family Relations, 32, 283-286.
• Byrne, B. (2000). Structural equation modelling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Calvete, E., Corral, S. y Estévez, A. (2007). Factor structure and validity of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale for Spanish women. Violence Against Women, 13, 1072-1087.
• Corral, S. (2009). Estudio de la violencia en el noviazgo en jóvenes universitarios/as: cronicidad, severidad y mutualidad de las conductas violentas. Psicopatología Clínica, Legal y Forense, 9, 29-48.
• Corral, S. y Calvete, E. (2006). Evaluación de la violencia en las relaciones de pareja mediante las Escalas de tácticas para conflictos: estructura factorial y diferencias de género en jóvenes. Psicología Conductual, 14, 215-233.
• Graña, J. L., Rodríguez, M. J. y Peña, M. E. (2009). Agresión hacia la pareja en una muestra de la Comunidad de Madrid: análisis por género. Psicopatología Clínica, Legal y Forense, 9, 7-28.
• Jose, A. y O'Leary, K. D. (2009). Prevalence of partner aggression in representative and clinic samples. En K. D. O'Leary y E. M. Woodin (dirs.), Psychological and physical aggression in couples: causes and interventions (pp. 15-35). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Harned, M. S. (2001). Abused women or abused men? An examination of the context and outcomes of dating violence. Violence and Victims, 16, 269-285.
• Hines, D. A. y Saudino, K. J. (2003). Gender differences in psychological, physical and sexual aggression among college students using the revised conflict tactics scales. Violence and Victims, 18, 197-217.
• Hu, L. y Bentler, P. M. (1999). Fit indices in covariance structure modelling: sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
• Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2010). Controversies involving gender and intimate partner violence in the United States. Sex Roles, 179-193.
• Langhinrichsen-Rholing, J., Neidig, P. y Thom, G. (1995). Violent marriages: gender differences in current marital violence and childhood abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 159-176.
• Loinaz, I., Echeburúa, E., Ortíz-Tallo, M. y Amor, P. J. (2012). Propiedades psicométricas de la CTS2 en una muestra española de agresores de pareja. Psicothema, 24, 142-148.
• Lucente, S. W., Fals-Stewart, W., Richards, H. J. y Goscha, J. (2001). Factor structure and reliability of the revised conflict tactics scale for incarcerated female substance abusers. Journal of Family Violence, 16, 437-450.
• Montes-Borges, B. (2008). Tácticas para la resolución de conflictos y celos románticos en relaciones íntimas: adaptación y análisis de las escalas CTS2 y CR. Estudios de Psicología, 29, 221-234.
• Muñoz-Rivas, M. J., Graña, J. L., O'Leary, K. D. y González, M. P. (2007a). Physical and psychological aggression in dating relationships in Spanish university students. Psicothema, 19, 102-107.
• Muñoz-Rivas, M. J., Graña, J. L., O'Leary, K. D. y González, M. P. (2007b). Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: prevalence, justification and health consequences. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 298-304.
• Riggs, D. S. (1993). Relationship problems and dating aggression: a potential treatment target. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 18-35.
• Riggs, D. S. y O'Leary, K. D. (1996). Aggression between heterosexual dating partners. An examination of a casual model of courtship aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 519-540.
• Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A. y Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323-337.
• Stets, J. E. (1990). Verbal and physical aggression in marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 501-514.
• Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the Conflict Tactics Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
• Straus, M. A. (2001). Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence Against Women, 10, 790-811.
• Straus, M. A. (2004a). Cross-cultural reliability and validity of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales: a study of university student dating couples in 17 nations. Cross-Cultural Research, 38, 407-432.
• Straus, M. A. (2004b). Women's violence toward men is a serious social problem. En R. J. Gelles y D. R. Loseke (dirs.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 55-77). Newbury Park, NY: Sage.
• Straus, M. A. (2007). Validity of cross-national research based on convenience samples: the case of the International Dating Violence Study data. En M. A. Straus (dir.), Violence against dating partners in world perspective: the International Dating Violence Study. Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire, EE. UU.
• Straus, M. A. (2008). Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 252-275.
• Straus, M. A. y Gelles, R. J. (1990). Physical violence in American families: risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8, 145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
• Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J. y Steinmetz, S. K. (1981). Behind closed doors: violence in the American family. Nueva York: Anchor Books.
• Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S. y Sugarman, D. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 7, 283-316.
• Sugihara, Y. y Warner, J. A. (2002). Dominance and domestic abuse among Mexican Americans: gender differences in the etiology of violence in intimate relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 17, 315-340.
• Tjaden, P. y Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence. Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington D. C, EE. UU.
• Yun, S. H. (2011). Factor structure and reliability of the revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2) 10-factor model in a community-based female sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 703-708.