Construcciones implicativas en inglés introducidas por un pronombre interrogativo en el Modelo Léxico Construccional

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ariel, M. (2008): Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• BArcelonA, A. (2003): “The case for a metonymic basis of pragmatic inferencing: Evidence from jokes and funny ancedotes”, in K-U. Panther and L. Thornburgh (eds.): Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 81-102.
• BArcelonA, A. (2005): “The multilevel operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse with particular attention to metonymic chains”, in F. Ruiz de Mendoza and S. Peña (eds.): Cognitive Linguistics. Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 313-352.
• BArcelonA, A. (2007): “The role of metonymic meaning construction at discourse level. A case study”, in G. Radden, K. M. Köpcke, T. Berg and P. Siemund (eds.): Aspects of Meaning Construction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 51-75.
• Brown, P. And S. c. levinSon (1987): Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Butler, c. S. (2009): “The Lexical Constructional Model: Genesis, strengths and challenges”, in C. S. Butler and J. Martín Arista (eds.): Deconstructing Constructions. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 117-152.
• croft, w. (2001): Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• dik, S. c. (1997): The Theory of Functional Grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• GoldBerG, A. e. (1995): Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• GoldBerG, A. e. (1998): “Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure”, Journal of Child Language 25, 2, pp. 431-491.
• GoldBerG, A. e. (2006): Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Gonzálvez-GArcíA, f. (2006): “Passives without actives: Evidence from verbless complement constructions in Spanish”, Constructions SV1-5. http://www.constructions-online.de/ articles/specvol1/679.
• Gonzálvez-GArcíA, f. (2008a): “Towards a constructionist, usage-based reappraisal of interpersonal manipulation in secondary predication in English and Spanish”, Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 57, pp. 109-136.
• Gonzálvez-GArcíA, f. (2008b): “The interaction between coercion and constructional polysemy: The case of verba dicendi et declarandi in secondary predication in English and Spanish”, in M. A. Gómez, J. Lachlan and E. M. González (eds.): Current trends in contrastive linguistics: Functional and cognitive perspectives. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 281-321.
• http://www.constructions-online.de/articles/specvol1/679
• http://www.constructions-online.de/articles/specvol1/679
• Gonzálvez-GArcíA, f. (2009a): “Measuring out reflexivity in secondary predication in English and Spanish: Evidence from verba cogitandi in English and Spanish”, in C. S. Butler and J. Martín Arista (eds.): Deconstructing constructions. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 101-145.
• Gonzálvez-GArcíA, f. (2009b): “The family of object-related depictives in English and Spanish: Towards a usage-based, constructionist analysis”, Language Sciences 31(5), pp. 663-723.
• Gonzálvez-GArcíA, f. (2011): “Metaphor and metonymy do not render coercion superfluous: Evidence from the subjective-transitive construction”, Linguistics 49-6, pp. 1305-1358.
• Gonzálvez-GArcíA, f. And c. S. Butler (2006): “Mapping functional-cognitive space”, Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4, pp. 39-96.
• Grice, H. P. (1975): “Logic and conversation”, in P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.): Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. London: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.
• Grice, H .P. (1981): “Presupposition and conversational implicature”, in P. Cole (ed.): Radical pragmatics. London: Academic Press, pp. 183-198.
• Horn, l. r. (1984): “Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature”, in D. Schiffrin (ed.): Meaning, Function, and Use in Context. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press, pp. 11-42.
• Horn, l. r. (1989): A Natural History of Negation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Horn, l. r. (2004): “Implicature”, in L. R. Horn and G. Ward (eds.): The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 3-28.
• kAy, P. And c. fillMore (1999): “Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? construction”, Language 75, 1, pp. 1-33.
• knooPS, c. (2007): “Constraints on inferential constructions”, in G. Radden, K. M. Köpcke, T. Berg and P. Siemund (eds.): Aspects of Meaning Construction. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 207-224.
• lAkoff, G. (1987): Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• lAnGAcker, r. w. (1987): Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• lAnGAcker, r. w. (1991): Concept, Image and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• lAnGAcker, r. w. (1999): Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• lAnGAcker, r. w. (2001) “Dynamicity in Grammar”, Axionathes 12, pp. 7-33.
• leecH, G. n. (1983): Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
• levin, B. (1993): English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• levinSon, S. c. (2000): Presumptive meanings. The theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• MAirAl, r. And c. Periñán (2010): “Teoría lingüística y representación del conocimiento: una discusión preliminar”, in D. García Padrón and Mª. C. Fumero Pérez (eds.): Tendencias en lingüística general y aplicada. Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 155-168.
• MAirAl, r. And f. J. ruiz de MendozA (2008a): “Internal and external constraints in meaning construction: the lexicon-grammar continuum”, in Estudios de Filología Inglesa: Homenaje a la Dra. Asunción Alba Pelayo. Madrid: UNED, pp. 219-237.
• MAirAl, r. And f. J. ruiz de MendozA (2008b): “New challenges for lexical representation within the Lexical-Constructional Model (LCM)”, Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 57, pp. 137-158.
• MAirAl, r. And f. J. ruiz de MendozA (2009): “Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction”, in C. S. Butler & J. Martín Arista (eds.): Deconstructing Constructions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 153-198.
• MicHAeliS, l. A. (2003): “Word meaning, sentence meaning, and syntactic meaning”, in H. Cuyckens, R. Dirven and J. Taylor (eds.): Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 163-209.
• otAl, J. l. (2000): “On high-level conceptual structure and discourse”, RESLA 14, pp. 325-336.
• PAntHer, k.-u. (2005): “The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction”, in F. Ruiz de Mendoza and S. Peña (eds.): Cognitive Linguistics. Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 335-386.
• Pérez, l. And f. J. ruiz de MendozA (2002): “Grounding, Semantic Motivation, and Conceptual Interaction in Indirect Directive Speech Acts”, Journal of Pragmatics 34/3, pp. 259-284.
• ruiz de MendozA, f. J. (1999): “From semantic underdetermination, via metaphor and metonymy to conceptual interaction”, LAUD-Essen Series A: General and Theoretical Papers.
• ruiz de MendozA, f. J. (2001): “Lingüística cognitiva: semántica, pragmática y construcciones”, Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación 8.
• ruiz de MendozA, f. J. 2008. “Cross-linguistic analysis, second language teaching and cognitive semantics: the case of Spanish diminutives and reflexive constructions”, in S. De Knop and T. De Rycker (eds.): Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical grammar – Volume in Honor of René Dirven. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 121-152.
• ruiz de MendozA iBáñez, f. J. And r. MAirAl uSón (2007): “High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction”, in G. Radden, K. M. Köpcke, T. Berg & P. Siemund (eds.): Aspects of Meaning Construction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 33-49.
• ruiz de MendozA iBáñez, f. J. And r. MAirAl uSón (2008): “Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: An introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model”, Folia Linguistica 42(2), pp. 355-400.
• ruiz de MendozA iBáñez, f. J. And r. MAirAl uSón (2011): “Constraints on syntactic alternations: lexical-constructional subsumption in the Lexical-Constructional Model”, in P. Guerrero (ed.): Morphosyntactic Alternations in English. Functional and Cognitive Perspectives.London, UK/Oakville, CT: Equinos, pp. 62-82.
• ruiz de MendozA, f. J. And J. l. otAl (2002): Metonymy, Grammar and Communication. Granada: Comares.
• ruiz de MendozA, f. J. And l. Pérez (2001): “Metonymy and the grammar: motivation, constraints, and interaction”, Language and Communication 21, pp. 321-357.
• SPerBer, d. And d. wilSon (1995): Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd edition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.