Can science offer an ultimate explamation of reality?

Referencias bibliográficas

• Many of the ideas presented in this article have already been discussed in [SOLS, F., «Uncertainty, incompleteness, chance, and design», in Intelligible Design, M. M. Carreira and Julio Gonzalo, eds., World Scientific (Singapore, 2013), in press; http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.7036].
• In turn, that article is an abridged translation of [SOLS, F., «Heisenberg, Gödel y la cuestión de la finalidad en la ciencia», in Ciencia y Religión en el siglo XXI: recuperar el diálogo, Emilio Chuvieco and Denis Alexander, eds., Editorial Centro de Estudios Ramón Areces (Madrid, 2012)].
• DEMBSKI, W. A., Intelligent Design: the Bridge between Science and Theology (1999).
• CHAITIN, G., Randomness and Mathematical Proof, Sci. Am. 232, 47 (1975).
• Rolf Landauer used to say that «information is physical» [Physics Today, May 1991, p. 23]. Without a physical support, there is no information. The latter emerges as the various possible future evolutions become specified.
• POPPER, K., The Open Universe: An Argument for Indeterminism (1982).
• ZUREK, W. H., Decoherence, Chaos, Quantum-Classical Correspondence, and the Algorithmic Arrow of Time, Physica Scripta T76, 186 (1998).
• The neurobiologist John C. Eccles (1963 Nobel Prize in Medicine) identified a neural process that might underlie an act of free choice [ECCLES, J. C, Evolution of consciousness, Proc. Nad. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 7320 (1992)
• BECK, F. - ECCLES, J. C, Quantum aspects of brain activity and the role of consciousness, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 11357 (1992)].
• Other neuroscientists question the reality of objectively free choice [KOCH, K. - HEPP, K., Quantum mechanics in the brain, Nature 440, 611 (2006)
• SMITH, K., Taking aim at free will, Nature 477, 23 (2011)]. In regard to the work by Koch and Hepp, we wish to point out that there is much more in quantum mechanics than just quantum computation.
• For a detailed discussion, see [EAGLE, A., Randomness is unpredictability, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56 (4), 749-790 (2005)
• EAGLE, A., «Chance versus Randomness», in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/chance-randomness/].
• CHAITIN, G., Meta Math The Quest for Omega, Vintage Books (New York, 2005).
• AYALA, F. J., Darwin and Intelligent Design (2006).
• REICHEL, H. C., «How can or should the recent developments in mathematics influence the philosophy of mathematics?», in Mathematical Undecidability, Quantum Nonlocality and the Question of the Existence of God, A. Driessen and A. Suárez, eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers (Dordrecht, 1997). Emphases are by Reichel.