Pictorial and verbo-pictorial metaphor in Spanish political cartooning

  1. Negro Alousque, Isabel
Revista:
Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación

ISSN: 1576-4737

Año de publicación: 2014

Número: 57

Páginas: 59-84

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5209/REV_CLAC.2014.V57.44515 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación

Resumen

In the last forty years the development of the Cognitive Metaphor Theory (Lakoff 1987, 2006, Lakoff & Johnson 1980) has given rise to a great amount of research into metaphor. The study of verbal metaphor was followed by several investigations into visual and multimodal metaphor (Forceville 2007, 2008, 2009). Whereas monomodal metaphor occurs in a single mode of representation, for instance verbal metaphor, pictorial metaphor or auditory metaphor, multimodal metaphor occurring in diverse modes, for instance verbo-pictorial metaphor. In much the same way, there have been numerous studies on metaphor-metonymy interaction cases in specialized genres. In the present article we explore monomodal visual and multimodal verbo-pictorial metaphors, and multimodal cases of metaphor-metonymy interaction (i.e. verbo-pictorial metonymy-based metaphors) in a corpus of Spanish print political cartoon strips drawn from the popular newspaper El País.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Baldry, Anthony & Thibault, Paul (2006). Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis: A Multimedia Toolkit and Coursebook. London: Equinox.
  • Barcelona, Antonio (2000) (ed.). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Barcelona, Antonio (2005): The multilevel operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse with particular attention to metonymic chains. In F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza & S. Peña (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics. Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction, 313-352. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Benczes, Réka; Barcelona, Antonio & Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J. (eds.) (2011). Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Caballero, Rosario (2009): Cutting across the senses: Imagery in winespeak and audiovisual promotion. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 73-94.
  • Caballero, Rosario & Suárez-Toste, Ernesto (2008): Translating the senses. Teaching the metaphors in winespeak. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (eds.), Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, 241-259. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Caballero, Rosario & Suárez-Toste, Ernesto (2010): A genre approach to imagery in winespeak: Issues and prospects". In G. Low et al. (eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World, 265-288. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Carroll, Noel (1994): Visual metaphor. In J. Hintikka (ed.), Aspects of Metaphor, 189-218. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Charteris-Black, Jonathan (2000): Metaphor and Vocabulary Teaching in ESP Economics. ESP Journal 19: 149-165.
  • Cienki, Alan (1998): Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphorical expressions. In J.P. Koenig (ed.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap, 189-204. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
  • Cienki, Alan & Müller, Cornelia (eds.) (2008). Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
  • Dirven, René & Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J. (2010): Looking back at 30 years of Cognitive Linguistics. In E. Tabakowska, M. Choiński & L. Wiraszka (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics in Action: from Theory to Application and Back, 13-70. Berlin/Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Eerden, Bart (2009): Anger in Asterix: The metaphorical representation of anger in comics and animated films. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (eds), 243-264.
  • Eggerstsson, Gunnar & Forceville, Charles (2009): Multimodal expressions of the human victim is an animal metaphor in horror films. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 429-49.
  • El Refaie, Elisabeth (2003): Understanding visual metaphor: the example of newspaper cartoons". Visual Communication 2(1): 75-95.
  • El Refaie, Elisabeth (2009): Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 19-42.
  • Forceville, Charles (1994): Pictorial metaphor in advertisements. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 9: 1-29.
  • Forceville, Charles (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge.
  • Forceville, Charles (2005): Addressing an audience: time, place, and genre in Peter Van Straaten's calendar cartoons. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 18: 247-278.
  • Forceville, Charles (2007): Multimodal metaphor in ten Dutch TV commercials. Public Journal of Semiotics 1(1): 19-51.
  • Forceville, Charles (2008): Metaphors in pictures and multimodal representations. In R. W. Jr. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 462-482. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Forceville, Charles (2009): Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 19-42.
  • Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr.; Bogdanovich, Josephine M.; Sykes, Jeffrey R. & Barr, Dale J. (1997): Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 141-154.
  • Gonzálvez-García, Francisco; Peña, Sandra & Pérez, Lorena (eds.) (2011): Metaphor and metonymy revisited beyond the Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. Recent developments and applications. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9:1.
  • Goossens, Louis (1990): Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics 1-3: 323-340.
  • Johnson, Mark (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Koller, Veronika (2009): Brand images: Multimodal metaphor in corporate branding messages. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 45-71.
  • Kövecses, Zoltan (1990). Emotion Concepts. New York: Springer.
  • Kövecses, Zoltan (2000). Metaphor and Emotion. Language, Culture and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kövecses, Zoltan (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kövecses, Zoltan (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kövecses, Zoltan & Radden, Günter (1998): Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 9 (1): 37-77.
  • Kress, Gunther & van Leeuwen, Theo (2001). Multimodal discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
  • Lakoff, George (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakoff, George (2006): The contemporary theory of metaphor. In D. Geeraerts (ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, 186-238. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Lakoff, George & Turner, Mark (1989). More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Langlotz, Andreas (2006). Idiomatic Creativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • McNeill, David (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • McNeill, David (2005). Gesture and Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Messaris, Paul (1997). Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising. California: Sage Publications.
  • Niemeier, Susanne (2000): Straight from the heart - metonymic and metaphorical explorations. In A. Barcelona (ed.), 195-214.
  • Panther, Klaus-Uwe; Thornburg, Linda & Barcelona, Antonio (2009). Metaphor and Metonymy in Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Philippe, Robert (1982). Political Graphics: Art as Weapon. Oxford: Phaidon Press.
  • Phillips, Barbara J. (2003): Understanding visual metaphor in advertising. In L.M. Scott & R. Batra (eds.), 297-310.
  • Radden, Günter (2000): How metonymic are metaphors? In A. Barcelona (ed.), 93-108.
  • Richardt, Susanne (2003): Metaphors in expert and common-sense reasoning. In C. Zelinsky-Wibbelt (ed.), Text, Context, Concepts, 243-296. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Rohdin, Maths (2009): Multimodal metaphor in classical film theory from the 1920s to the 1850s'. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparasi (eds.), 403-428.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J. (1999a). Introducción a la Teoría Cognitiva de la Metonimia. Granada: Método Ediciones.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J. (2000): The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (ed.), 109-132.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J. & Díez Velasco, Olga (2002): Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, 489-532. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. & Díez Velasco, Olga (2003): High-level metonymy and linguistic structure. In C. Inchaurralde & C. Florén, C. (eds.), Interaction and Cognition in Linguistics, 189-210. Frankfurt and New York: Peter Lang.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J. & Mairal, Ricardo (2007): High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg et al. (eds.), Aspects of Meaning Construction, 33-51. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J. & Otal, José Luis (2002). Metonymy, Grammar and Communication. Granada: Comares.
  • Schilperoord, Joost & Maes, Alfonso (2009): Visual metaphoric conceptualization in editorial cartoons. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparasi (eds.), 213-240.
  • Scott, Linda M. & Batra, Rajeev (eds.) (2003). Persuasive imagery. A Consumer Perspective. Mahwah, NJ/London: Lawrence Erlbaum
  • Shinohara, Kazuko & Matsunaka, Yoshihiro (2009): Pictorial metaphors of emotion in Japanese comics. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 265-93.
  • Templin, Charlotte (1999): Hillary Clinton as Threat to Gender Norms: Cartoon Images of the First Lady. Journal of Communication Inquiry 23 (1): 20-36.
  • Teng, Norman Y. (2009): Image alignment in multimodal metaphor. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 197-211.
  • Urios-Aparisi, Eduardo (2009): Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 95-117.
  • Velasco-Sacristán, Marisol & Fuertes-Olivera, Pedro (2004). Metáfora y LSP: valor cognitivo de la metáfora en el discurso publicitario de British Cosmopolitan. In I. Sanz and A. Felices (eds.), Las nuevas tendencias de las lenguas de especialidad en un contexto internacional y multicultural, 863-878. Granada: Universidad de Granada.
  • Velasco-Sacristán, Marisol & Fuertes-Olivera, Pedro (2006a): Towards a critical cognitive-pragmatic approach to gender metaphors in Advertising English. Journal of Pragmatics 38 (11): 1982-2002.
  • Velasco-Sacristán, Marisol & Fuertes-Olivera, Pedro (2006b): Olfactory and olfactory-mixed metaphors in print ads of perfumes. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4: 217-252.
  • Ventola, Eija; Cassily, Charles & Kaltenbacher, Martin (2004). Perspectives on Multimodality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Ventola, Eija & Guijarro, Jesús (2009). The World Told and The World Shown: Multisemiotic Issues. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Wiggin, Amy A. & Miller, Christine M. (2003): 'Uncle Sam Wants You!' Exploring Verbal-Visual Juxtapositions in Television Advertising. In L.M. Scott & R. Batra (eds.), 267-295.
  • White, Michael (2003): Metaphor and Economics: The case of growth. English for Specific Purposes: An International Journal of ESP 22/2: 131-151.
  • Yus, Francisco (2009): Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: A unified account. In C. Forceville and E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 147-172.
  • Zbikowski, Lawrence (2009): Music, Language, and Multimodal Metaphor. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 359-381.
  • Yu, Ning 2009: Nonverbal and multimodal manifestations of metaphors and metonymies: A case study. In C. Forceville and E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 119-143.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet