Detección de información oculta mediante potenciales relacionados con eventos

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• Abootalebi V., Moradi M.H., Khalilzadeh M.A. A comparison of methods for ERP assessment in a P300-based GKT. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2006, 62:309-320.
• Allen J.J., Iacono W.G., Kurt D.D. The identification of concealed memories using the event-related potential and implicit behavioral measures: A methodology for prediction in the face of individual differences. Psychophysiology 1992, 29:504-522.
• Allen J.B.B., Mertens R. Limitations to the detection of deception: True and false recollections are poorly distinguished using an event-related potential procedure. Social Neuroscience 2009, 4:473-490.
• Alonso E., Álvarez M.A., Reyes A., Fernández O., Barroso E., Pando A. Uso de potenciales relacionados con eventos para el diagnóstico y seguimiento de los trastornos subclínicos de la atención sostenida en la enfermedad cerebrovascular isquémica. Revista de Neurología 2002, 34:1017-1020.
• Ambach W., Bursch S., Stark R., Vaitl D. A Concealed Information Test with multimodal measurement. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2010, 75:258-267.
• Amoruso L., Sedeño L., Huepe D., Tomio A., Kamienkowsky J., Hurtado E., Ibañez A. Time to tango: Expertise and contextual anticipation during actionobservation. Neuroimage 2014, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.005.
• Amoruso L., Gelormini C., Aboitiz F., González M.A., Manes F., Cardona J.F., Ibañez A. N400 ERPs for actions: building meaning in context. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013, 7(57):1-16.
• Ben-Shakhar G. Current research and potential applications of the concealed information test: an overview. Frontiers in Psychology 2012, 3:342.
• Burgess P.W., Alderman N., Forbes C., Costello A., Coates L.M.A., Dawson D.R., Channon S. The case for the development and use of ecologically valid measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2006, 12:194-209.
• Chapman R.M., Bragdon H.R. Evoked responses to numerical and non-numerical visual stimuli while problem solving. Nature 1964, 203:1155-1157.
• Church D.J. Neuroscience in the courtroom: An international concern. William and Mary Law Review 2012, 53:1825-1854.
• Comerchero M.D., Polich J. P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology 1999, 110(1):24-30.
• Donchin E. Surprise! surprise?. Psychophysiology 1981, 18:493-513.
• Donchin E., Heffley E.F. The independence of the P300 and the CNV reviewed: a reply to Wastell. Biological Psychology 1979, 9:177-188.
• Donchin E., Spencer K.M., Wijesinghe R. The mental prosthesis: assessing the speed of a P300-based brain-computer interface. Rehabilitation Engineering 2000, 8(2):174-179.
• Düzel E., Yonelinas A.P., Mangun G.R., Heinze H.J., Tulving E. Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1997, 94:5973-5978.
• Ebrahimzadeh E., Alavi S., Bijar A., Pakkhesal A. A novel approach for detection of deception using Smoothed Pseudo Wigner-Ville Distribution (SPWVD). Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering 2013, 6:8-18.
• Eysenck M.W. Testimonio de testigos. Memoria 2010, 351-376. Alianza Editorial, Madrid. A. Baddeley, M.W. Eysenck, M.C. Anderson (Eds.).
• Farwell L.A. Brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Neurodynamics 2012, 6:115-154.
• Farwell L.A., Donchin E. The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy (lie detection) with event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 1991, 28:531-547.
• Farwell L.A., Richardson D.C. Brain fingerprinting: let's focus on the science: a reply to Meijer, Ben-Shakhar. Verschuere, and Donchin. Cognitive Neurodynamics 2013, 7:159-166.
• Farwell L.A., Richardson D.C., Richardson G.M. Brain fingerprinting studies comparing P300-MERMER and P300 brainwave responses in the detection of concealed information. Cognitie Neurodynamics 2013, 7:263-299.
• Farwell L.A., Smith S.S. Using brain MERMER testing to detect knowledge despite efforts to conceal. Journal of Forensic Sciences 2001, 46(1):135-143.
• Greene J.D., Paxton J.M. Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106:12506-12511.
• Hansenne M. The p300 cognitive event-related potential. II. Individual variability and clinical application in psychopathology. Neurophysiologie clinique /Clinical neurophysiology 2000, 30:211-231.
• Hu X., Hegeman D., Landry E., Rosenfeld J.P. Increasing the number of irrelevant stimuli increases ability to detect countermeasures to the P300-based Complex Trial Protocol for concealed information detection. Psychophysiology 2012, 49(1):85-95.
• Hu X., Pornpattananangkul N., Rosenfeld J.P. N200 and P300 as orthogonal and integrable indicators of distinct awareness and recognition processes in memory detection. Psychophysiology 2013, 50:454-464.
• Hu X., Chen H., Fu G. A repeated lie becomes a truth?. The effect of intentional control and training on deception. Frontiers in Psychology 2012, 3:1-7.
• Hu X., Rosenfeld J.P. Combining the P300-complex trial-based concealed information test and the reaction time-based autobiographical implicit association test in concealed memory detection. Psychophysiology 2012, 49:1090-1100.
• Iacono W.G. The forensic application of brain fingerprinting: why scientists should encourage the use of P300 memory detection methods. The American Journal of Bioethics 2008, 8(1):30-32.
• Johnson R., Pfefferbaum A., Koppel B.S. P300 and long-term memory: Latency predicts recognition performance. Psychophysiology 1985, 22:497-507.
• Johnson M.K., Nolde S.F., Mather M., Kounios J., Schacter D.L., Curran T. The similarity of brain activity associated with true and false recognition memory depends on test format. Psychological Science 1997, 8:250-257.
• Kotchoubey B. Event-related potentials, cognition, and behavior: a biological approach. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2006, 30(1):42-65.
• Kutas M. Views on how the electrical activity that the brain generates reflects the functions of different language structures. Psychophysiology 1997, 34:383-398.
• Lui M., Rosenfeld J.P. Detection of deception about multiple, concealed, mock crime items, based on a spatial-temporal analysis of ERP amplitude and scalp distribution. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:721-730.
• Lykken D.T. The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology 1959, 43:385-388.
• Lykken D.T. The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: The effects of faking. Journal of Applied Psychology 1960, 44:258-262.
• Lykken D.T. Psychology and the lie detection industry. American Psychologist 1974, 29:725-739.
• Lykken D.T. Uses and abuses of the polygraph. Psychology: From research to practice (p 1978, 171-191. Plenum Press, New York. H.L. Pick (Ed.).
• Makeig T.H. Brain fingerprinting testing in the case of Harrington vs State. Open Court X, 3 7-10. Indiana State Bar Association 2005.
• Manzanero A.L. Memoria de testigos: obtención y valoración de la prueba testifical. Madrid: Pirámide 2010.
• Marti S., Álvarez M., Simoneau-Roy J., Leroux S., Van Vliet G., Robaey P. Effects of early high-dose levothyroxine treatment on auditory brain event-related potentials at school entry in children with congenital hypothyroidism. Hormone Research 2006, 66:240-248.
• Matsuda I., Nittono H., Allen J.J.B. The current and future status of the concealed information test for field use. Frontiers in Psychology 2012, 3(532):1-11.
• Matsuda I., Nittono H., Allen J.J.B. Detection of concealed information by P3 and frontal EEG asymmetry. Neuroscience Letters 2013, 537:55-59.
• Meijer E.H., Ben-Shakhar G., Verschuere B., Donchin E. A comment on Farwell (2012): brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials. Cognitive neurodynamics 2013, 7:155-158.
• Meijer E.H., Smulders F.T.Y., Wolf A. The contribution of mere recognition to the P300 effect in a concealed information test. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback 2009, 34:221-226.
• Mertens R., Allen J.J.B. The role of psychophysiology in forensic assessments: Deception detection. ERPs, and virtual reality mock crime scenarios. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:286-298.
• Miller A.R., Baratta C., Wynveen C., Rosenfeld J.P. P300 latency, but not amplitude or topography, distinguishes between true and false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2001, 27:354-361.
• Miyake Y., Mizutanti M., Yamahura T. Event related potentials as an indicator of detecting information in field polygraph examinations. Polygraph 1993, 22:131-149.
• Norman K.A., Schacter D.L. Implicit memory, explicit memory, and false recollection: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Implicit memory and metacognition 1996, 229-257. LEA, New Jersey. L.M. Reder (Ed.).
• Piccione F., Giorgi F., Tonin P., Priftis K., Giove S., Silvoni S., Beverina F. P300-based brain computer interface: reliability and performance in healthy and paralysed participants. Clinical Neurophysiology 2006, 117:531-537.
• Picton T.W. The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 1992, 9:456-479.
• Picton T.W., Hillyard S.A. Endogenous event-related potentials. Human Event-Related Potentials. Handbook of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (p 1988, 361-426. Elsevier, Amsterdam. T.W. Picton (Ed.).
• Polich J. Overview of P3a and P3b. Detection of Change: Event-Related Potential and fMRI Findings (p 2003, 83-98. Kluwer Academic Press, Boston. J. Polich (Ed.).
• Polich J. Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118:2128-2148.
• Posner M.I. Chronometric explorations of mind 1978, Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ.
• Roediger H.L., McDermott K.B. Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists, Journal of experimental psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21:803-814.
• Rosenfeld J.P. 'Brain fingerprinting': A critical analysis. The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice 2005, 4(1):20-37.
• Rosenfeld J.P., Shue E., Singer E. Single versus multiple probe blocks of P300-based concealed information tests for self-referring versus incidentally obtained information. Biological psychology 2007, 74:396-404.
• Rosenfeld J.P., Hu X., Labkovsky E., Meixner J., Winograd M.R. Review of recent studies and issues regarding the P300-based complex trial protocol for detection of concealed information. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2013, 90:118-134.
• Rosenfeld J.P., Nasman V.T., Whalen I., Cantwell B., Mazzeri L. Late vertex positivity in event-related potentials as a guilty knowledge indicator: A new method of lie detection. International Journal of Neuroscience 1987, 34:125-129.
• Rosenfeld J.P., Soskins M., Bosh G., Ryan A. Simple, effective countermeasures to P300-based tests of detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:205-219.
• Rugg M.D., Barret S.E. Event-related potentials and interaction between orthographic and phonological information in rhyme-judgement task. Brain and Language 1987, 32:336-361.
• Rugg M.D., Curran T. Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:251-257.
• Schacter D.L., Reiman E., Curran T., Yun L.S., Bandy D., McDermott K.B., Roediger H.L. Neuroanatomical correlates of veridical and illusory recognition memory: Evidence from positron emission tomography. Neuron 1996, 17:267-274.
• Sip K.E., Roepstorff A., McGreor W., Frith C.D. Detecting decepcion: the scope and limits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12(2):48-53.
• Squires N.K., Squires K.C., Hillyard S.A. Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology 1975, 38:387-401.
• Sutton S., Braren M., Zubin J., John E.R. Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 1965, 150:1187-1188.
• Sutton S., Tueting P., Zubin J., John E.R. Information delivery and the sensory evoked potential. Science 1967, 155:1436-1439.
• Verschuere, B., Ben-Shakhar, G. y Meijer, E. H. (Eds) (2011). Memory detection: theory and application of the concealed information test. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Winograd M.R., Rosenfeld J.P. Mock crime application of the Complex Trial Protocol (CTP) P300-based concealed information test. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:155-161.
• Winograd, M. R. y Rosenfeld, J. P. (submitted). The impact of prior knowledge from participant instructions in a mock crime P300 concealed information test.
• Wolpe P.R., Foster K., Langleben D.D. Emerging technologies for lie detection: promises and perils. American Journal of Bioethics 2005, 5(2):39-49.