Spanish version of the Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire 30 (MCQ-30)

  1. Ramos Cejudo, Juan 1
  2. Salguero Noguera, José Martín 2
  3. Cano Vindel, Antonio 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  2. 2 Universidad de Málaga
    info

    Universidad de Málaga

    Málaga, España

    ROR https://ror.org/036b2ww28

Revue:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Année de publication: 2013

Número: 16

Pages: 1-8

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2013.95 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

The Meta-cognitions Questionnaire 30 (MCQ-30; Wells & Cartwright-Hatton, 2004) has been used to assess individual differences in metacognitive beliefs considered to be central in the metacognitive theory of generalized anxiety disorder (Wells, 2005). In the present study, the psychometric properties, reliability, and validity of a Spanish adaptation of the MCQ-30 were tested in a broad sample of participants (N = 768) of Spanish nationality aged 16�81 years (31.1% males, 68.9% females). Confirmatory factor analysis showed the expected five-factor structure, which was found to be invariant across gender. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the subscales were adequate, and the expected relationships to theoretically related variables such as pathological worry, meta-worry, thought suppression and trait anxiety were obtained. Convergent validity with other measures of beliefs about worry was also found. Taken together, these findings suggest that the Spanish version of the MCQ-30 is a valid instrument for evaluating metacognitive beliefs in the Spanish-speaking population.

Références bibliographiques

  • Barahmand U. (2009). Meta-cognitive profiles in anxiety disorders. Psychiatry Research, 169, 240-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.06.029.
  • Behar E., DiMarco I. D., Hekler E. B., Mohlman J., & Staples A. M. (2009). Current theoretical models of Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD): Conceptual review and treatment implications. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 1011-1023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.07.006.
  • Bentler P. M. (1995). EQS: Structural equations programs. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
  • Brett C. M. C., Johns L. C., Peters E. P., & McGuire P. K. (2009). The role of metacognitive beliefs in determining the impact of anomalous experiences: A comparison of help-seeking and non-help-seeking groups of people experiencing psychotic-like anomalies. Psychological Medicine, 39, 939-950. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291708004650.
  • Cartwright-Hatton S., & Wells A. (1997). Beliefs about worry and intrusions: The meta-cognitions questionnaire and its correlates. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 279-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6185(97)00011-X.
  • Cohen J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Davis R. N., & Valentiner D. P. (2000). Does meta-cognitive theory enhance our understanding of pathological worry and anxiety? Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 513-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00211-1.
  • Fernández B. P., Extremera N., & Ramos N. (2004). Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the White Bear Suppression Inventory. Psychological Report, 94, 782-784.
  • Fisher P. L., & Wells A. (2008). Metacognitive therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A case series. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 39, 117-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.12.001.
  • Floyd F. J., & Widaman K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.286.
  • Freeston M. H., Rhéaume J., Letarte H., Dugas M. J., & Ladouceur R. (1994). Why do people worry? Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 791-802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90048-5.
  • González M., Bethencourt J. M., Fumero A., & Fernández A. (2006). Adaptación española del cuestionario ¿Por qué preocuparse? [Spanish adaptation of the "Why worry?" questionnaire]. Psicothema, 18, 313-318.
  • Holeva V., & Tarrier N. (2001). Personality and peritraumatic dissociation in the prediction of PTSD in victims of road traffic accidents. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 51, 687-692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00256-2.
  • Hu L., Bentler P. M., & Kano Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure-analysis be trusted? Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.2.351.
  • Janeck A. S., Calamari J. E., Riemann B. C., & Heffelfinger S. K. (2003). Too much thinking about thinking?: Metacognitive differences in obsessivecompulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 17, 181-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6185(02)00198-6.
  • Maher-Edwards L., Fernie B. A., Murphy G., Wells A., & Spada M. M. (2011). Metacognitions and negative emotions as predictors of symptom severity in chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 70, 311-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.09.016.
  • Meyer T. J., Miller M. L., Metzger R. L., & Borkovec T. D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 487-495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(90)90135-6.
  • Molina S., & Borkovec T. D. (1994). The Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and associated characteristics. In G. Davey & F. Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 265-283). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Nuevo R., Montorio I., & Ruiz M. A. (2002). Applicability of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in an older adult population. Ansiedad y Estrés, 8, 157-172.
  • Nunnally J. C., & Bernstein I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Schweizer K. (2010). Some guidelines concerning the modelling of traits and abilities in test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 1-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000001.
  • Spada M. M., Mohiyeddini C., & Wells A. (2008). Measuring metacognitions associated with emotional distress: Factor structure and predictive validity of the metacognitions questionnaire 30. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 238-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.04.005.
  • Spada M. M., Moneta G. B., & Wells A. (2007). The relative contribution of metacognitive beliefs and expectancies to drinking behavior. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 42, 567-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agm055.
  • Spielberger C. D. (1983). State-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Spielberger C. D., Gorsuch R. L., & Luschene R. E. (1982). Cuestionario de Ansiedad Estado-Rasgo. [The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory]. Madrid, Spain: TEA ediciones.
  • Tallis F., Davey G. C. L., & Capuzzo N. (1994). The phenomenology of non-pathological worry: A preliminary investigation. In G. C. L. Davey & F Tallis, (Eds.), Worrying: perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 61-89). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Tosun A., & Irak M. (2008). Adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Metacognition Questionnaire-30 for the Turkish population, and its relationship to anxiety and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 19, 67-80.
  • Typaldou M., Nidos A., Roxanis I., Dokianaki F., Vaidakis N., & Papadimitriou G. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) in a Greek sample. Annals of General Psychiatry, 9, 103-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-9-S1-S103.
  • Wells A. (1995). Meta-cognition and worry: A cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 301-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465800015897.
  • Wells A. (1999). A cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavior Modification, 23, 526-555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0145445599234002.
  • Wells A. (2000). Emotional disorders & metacognition: Innovative cognitive therapy. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Wells A. (2005). The metacognitive model of GAD: Assessment of meta-worry and relationship with DSM-IV generalized anxiety disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29, 107-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-1652-0.
  • Wells A., & Carter K. (2001). Further tests of a cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder: Metacognitions and worry in GAD, panic disorder, social phobia, depression and nonpatients. Behavior Therapy, 32, 85-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(01)80045-9.
  • Wells A., & Cartwright-Hatton S. (2004). A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: Properties of the MCQ-30. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 385-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00147-5.
  • Wells A., & Matthews G. (1994). Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
  • Wegner D. M., & Zanakos S. (1994). Chronic thought suppression, Journal of Personality, 62, 615-640. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00311.x.
La source de données: Dialnet