Authorial Voice Behind the Use of Multimodal Metaphors in Fashion Magazine Advertising

  1. Martín de la Rosa, María Victoria
Revista:
Alicante Journal of English Studies / Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses: RAEI
  1. Caporale Bizzini, Silvia (coord.)
  2. Esposito, Lucia (coord.)
  3. Ruggiero, Alejandra (coord.)

ISSN: 0214-4808 2171-861X

Año de publicación: 2013

Título del ejemplar: Identity, Culture and Performance Studies

Número: 26

Páginas: 239-257

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.14198/RAEI.2013.26.17 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRUA editor

Otras publicaciones en: Alicante Journal of English Studies / Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses: RAEI

Resumen

This paper proposes the integration into a coherent whole of current insights from two linguistic approaches, cognitive and systemic functional linguistics, with the aim of trying to develop an analytical tool that will allow users a deeper understanding when examining advertising discourse, which is characterized by relying on a multimodal universe since two are the semiotic modes used: language and pictures. Under this framework, two different advertisements, taken from two magazines, Telva and Gentleman, have been analyzed with specific attention to the role of the authorial voice. The goal is twofold: firstly to investigate how, in every advertisement, this multimodality works towards presenting a particular product from a very desirable and attractive perspective; and secondly to unravel the values and ideology behind the use of this type of discourse. The results show that values such as those of exclusivity or refinement (first advert) or having a perfect shape (second advert) are highly valued in the culture where those adverts are embedded

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail (1981): The Dialogic Imagination (translated by C. Emerson and M. Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Barthes, Roland (1978): Image, Music, Text (translated by Stephen Heath). New York: Hill and Wang.
  • Black, Max (1993): “More about metaphor.” In A. Ortony, ed., Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, 20-41.
  • Carroll, Noel (1994). Visual metaphor. In. J. Hintikka ed., Aspects of metaphor. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 189-218.
  • Cortés de los Ríos, María Enriqueta (2010): “Cognitive devices to communicate the economic crisis: An analysis through cover in The Economist.” Ibérica 20: 81-106.
  • Forceville, Charles (1994): “Pictorial metaphor in advertisements.” Metaphor and symbolic activity 9(1): 1-29.
  • Forceville, Charles (1996): Pictorial metaphor in advertising. New York: Routledge.
  • Forceville, Charles (2006): “Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research.” In G. Kristiansen, M. Archand, R. Dirven and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, eds., Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 379-402.
  • Forceville, Charles (2007): Multimodal metaphor in ten Dutch TV commercials. Public Journal of Semiotics, 1, 19-51.
  • Forceville, Charles (2008): “Metaphor in Pictures and Multimodal Representations.” In R. Gibbs Jr. ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 462-482.
  • Gibbs, Raymond (1994): The Poetics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goatly, Andrew (2007): Washing the brain: Metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdan/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  • Herrera, Honesto and Michael White (2012). Metaphor and Mills: Figurative Language in Business and Economics. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Hawkins, Bruce (2001): “Ideology, metaphor and iconographic reference.” In R. Dirven, R. Frank and C. Illie, eds., Language and Ideology II. John Benjamins Publishing Company: 27-50.
  • Hunston, Susan (2003b): “Evaluation and the planes of discourse: status and value in persuasive texts.” In S. Hunston, and G. Thompson, eds., Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hunston, Susan and Geoffrey Thompson, eds. (2003a): Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Johnson, Mark (1987): The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Kennedy, John (1982): “Metaphor in pictures.” Perception 11: 589-605.
  • Kovecses, Zoltan (2002): Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kovecses, Zoltan (2005): Metaphor in Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lakoff, George (1987): Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakoff, George (1993): “The contemporary theory of metaphor.” In A. Ortony, ed., Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 202-251.
  • Lakoff, George (2004): Don’t think of an elephant: Know your values and frame the debate. Chelsea Green Publishing: New York.
  • Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson (2003): Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1980).
  • Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson (1999): Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
  • Lakoff, George and Mark Turner (1989): More than cool reason: a field guide to poetic metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lakoff, George and Núñez, Rafael (2000): Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.
  • Martín de la Rosa, Victoria and Luis Miguel Lázaro Lorente (2011). “The Race to Educational Reform in the USA: the race to the top.” Language and Education 479-490
  • Martin, J. Robert and Peter White (2005): The language of evaluation. Palgrave Macmillan. Ortony, Andrew (1993): Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Richards, Ivor Armstrong (1971): The philosophy of rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1936).
  • Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José (1999a): Introducción a la Teoría Cognitiva de la Metonimia. Granada: Método.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José (1999b): “From semantic underdetermination via metaphor and metonymy to conceptual interaction.” Laud 492: 1-21.
  • Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson (1987): “Précis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition.” Behavioural and Brain Sciences 10(4): 697-710.
  • Taylor, John (1995): Linguistic Cross-categorization. Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Paperbacks.
  • White, Michael (1997): “The use of Metaphor in Reporting Financial Market Transactions.” Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 6(2): 233-245.