Metodología de la evaluación de impacto: contrafactuales y causalidad. En busca del diseño perfecto/perdido

Referencias bibliográficas

• BERK, R. A. (2011) “Evidence-Based Versus JunkBased Evaluation Research: Some Lessons from 35 Years of the Evaluation Review” en Evaluation Review No. 35, Vol. 3, pp.191-203.
• BERK, R. A. y SHERMAN, L. W. (1988) “Police Responses to Family Violence Incidents: An Analysis of An Experimental Design With Incomplete Randomization” en Journal of American Statistical Association, No. 83.
• BERK, R. A.; CAMPBELL, A.; KLAP, R. y WESTERN, B. (1992). “Bayesian Analysis of the Colorado Springs Spouse Abuse Experiment” en Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, No. 83 pp. 170-200.
• CAMPBELL, D. T. y STANLEY J. C. (1963) “Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research on Teaching”, en N. L. GAGE (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, Chicago, Rand McMally & Co., pp. 171-246.
• COOK, T. D.; SCRIVEN, M.; CORYN, C. L. S. y EVERGREEN, E. D. H. (2010) “Contemporary Thinking About Causation in Evaluation: A Dialogue With Tom Cook and Michael Scriven” en American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 1, No 31, pp. 105-117.
• CUMMINGS, R. (2006) “What if the counterfactual in program evaluation?” en Evaluation Journal of Australasia, Vol. 6 (new series), No. 2, pp. 6 – 1 5.
• CHEN, H.-T. (1990) Theory-driven evaluations. 1th edition. Newbury Park, California, Sage Publications.
• DAVIES, R. y DART, J. (2005) “The ‘Most Significant Change’ (MSC) Technique. A Guide of Its Uses”. Funded by CARE International, United Kingdom. Oxfam Community Aid Abroad, Australia | Learning to Learn, Government of South Australia. Oxfam New Zealand | Christian Aid, United Kingdom | Exchange, United Kingdom. Ibis, Denmark | Mellemfolkeligt Samvirke (MS), Denmark. Lutheran World Relief, United States of America.
• DYBDAL L., NIELSEN S. B. y LEMIRE S. (2011) “Contribution Analysis Applied: Reflections on Scope and Methodology” en The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 29–57.
• FRANKLYN W. D.; HUIZINGA, D. y ELLIOTT, D. S. (1990) “The Role of Arrest in Domestic Assault: The Omaha Experiment” en Criminology. Vol. 28, pp.183-206.
• GILL, M. y TURBIN, V. (1999) “Evaluating ‘Realistic Evaluation’: Evidence from a study of CCTV” en Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 10, pp. 179-199.
• Heckman, J. J. (2005) “The Scientific Model of Causality” en Sociological Methodology, Vol. 35, pp. 1-97.
• HECKMAN, J. J. y HOTZ, V. J. (1989) “Choosing Among Alternative Nonexperimental Methods for Estimating the Impact of Social Programs: The Case of Manpower Training” en Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 84 No. 408 pp. 862-74.
• HIRSCHEL, J. D.; HUTCHISON, I. W. y DEAN, C. W. (1992) “The Failure of Arrest to Deter Spouse Abuse” en Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 29 pp. 7-33.
• LALONDE, R. J. (1986) “Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental Data” en The American Economic Review Vol. 76, No. 4, pp. 604-620.
• MANSKI, C. F. (1997) “The Mixing Problem in Programme Evaluation” en The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 537-553.
• MARTEL, F. y WANTCHEKON, L. (2010) “Theory, External Validity, and Experimental Inference: Some Conjectures” en The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2010, pp. 132-147.
• MAYNE, J. (1999) “Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: Using performance measures sensibly” (discussion paper). Ottawa, ON: Office of the Auditor General of Canada. Retrieved at http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection/FA3-31-1999E.pdf
• PATE, A. y HAMILTON, E. E. (1992) “ Formal and Informal Deterrents to Domestic Violence: The Dade County Spouse Assault Experiment” en American Sociological Review, Vol. 57 pp. 691-697.
• PAWSON, R. y TILLEY, N. (1997) Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage Publications.
• PEARL, J. (1993) “Comment: Graphical models, causality, and intervention” en Statistical Science, Vol.8, pp. 266–269.
• PEARL, J. (1995) “Causal diagrams for empirical research” en Biometrika, Vol. 82 No. 4 pp. 669–710.
• PEARL, J. (2000) Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, New York. Second ed. 2009.
• PEARL, J. (2009) “Causal inference in statistics: An overview” en Statistics Surveys, Vol. 3, pp. 96–146.
• PECK, L. R. (2003) “Measuring Program Impacts Based on Post-Treatment Choice” en American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 157-187.
• PECK, L. R.; CAMILLO, F. e IDA D’ATTOMA (2010) “A promising new approach to eliminating selection bias” en The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 31–56.
• RICCIO, J. A. y BLOOM, H. S. (2002) “Extending the Reach of Randomized Social Experiments: New Directions in Evaluations of American Welfare-to-Work and Employment Initiatives” en Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), Vol. 165, No. 1, pp. 13-30.
• RUBIN, D. (1974) “Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies” en Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 66 pp. 688–701.
• RUBIN, D. B. y WATERMAN, R. P. (2006) “Estimating the Causal Effects of Marketing Interventions Using Propensity Score” en Methodology Statistical Science, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 206-222.
• SHERMAN, L. W. y BERK, R. A. (1984) “The Specific Deterrent Effects of Arrest for Domestic Assault” en American Sociological Review, Vol. 49, pp. 261-272.
• SHERMAN, L. W. y BERK, R. A. (1984) “The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment”. Police Foundation. Minneapolis.
• SHERMAN, L. W.; SCHMIDT, J. D.; ROGAN, D. P.; GARTIN, P.; COHEN, E. G.; COLLINS, D. J.; y BACICH, A. R. (1991). “From Initial Deterrence to Long-Term Escalation: Short Custody Arrest for Poverty Ghetto Domestic Violence” en Criminology, Vol. 29 pp. 821-850.
• TIAN, J. y PEARL, J. (2002) “A general identification condition for causal effects” en Proceedings of the Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press/The MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 567–573.
• TILLEY, N. (2000) “Realistic Evaluation: An Overview” presented at the Founding Conference of the Danish Evaluation Society, September 2000.
• THONGLEK, S.; HOWES, T. y KAVANAGH, L. (2011) “Work integrated learning: a realistic evaluation of KMUTT’s chemical engineering practice school” en Proceedings of the 2011 AAEE Conference, Fremantle, Western Australia.
• WHITE, H. (2010) “A Contribution to Current Debates in Impact Evaluation” en Evaluation, Vol. 16, pp. 153-164.
• WINSHIP, C. y MORGAN, S. L. (1999) “The estimation of causal effects from observational data” en Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 25, pp. 659- 706.