Academic context and perceived mental workload of psychology students

  1. Rubio Valdehita, Susana
  2. López-Higes Sánchez, Ramón
  3. Díaz Ramiro, Eva María
Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Año de publicación: 2014

Volumen: 17

Páginas: 1-8

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2014.57 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Resumen

The excessive workload of university students is an academic stressor. Consequently, it is necessary to evaluate and control the workload in education. This research applies the NASA-TLX scale, as a measure of the workload. The objectives of this study were: (a) to measure the workload levels of a sample of 367 psychology students, (b) to group students according to their positive or negative perception of academic context (AC) and c) to analyze the effects of AC on workload. To assess the perceived AC, we used an ad hoc questionnaire designed according to Demand-Control-Social Support and Effort-Reward Imbalance models. Using cluster analysis, participants were classified into two groups (positive versus negative context). The differences between groups show that a positive AC improves performance (p < .01) and reduces feelings of overload (p < .02), temporal demand (p < .02), and nervousness and frustration (p < .001). Social relationships with peers and teachers, student autonomy and result satisfaction were relevant dimensions of the AC (p < .001 in all cases).

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ANECA (2005). Libro blanco. Título de grado en psicología. Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad la Acreditación (ANECA). [White book. Higher degree in psychology. National Evaluating Agency of Acreditation Quality]. Madrid, Spain: ANECA. Retrieved from http://www.aneca.es/var/media//150356/libroblanco-psicologia-def.pdf
  • Bandura A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
  • Barnes C. M., & Van Dyne L. (2009). " I'm tired" : Differential effects of physical and emotional fatigue on workload management strategies. Human Relations, 62, 59-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726708099518
  • Cabanach R., Valle A., Rodr íguez S., Piñeiro I., & González P. (2010). Las creencias motivacionales como factor protector Del estrés en estudiantes universitarios [Motivatio nal beliefs as protective factors against stress in university students]. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 3, 75-87.
  • Emerson L., & MacKay B. (2011). A comparison between paper-based and online lear ning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 727-735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01081.x
  • Gardner D. H., & Parkinson T. J. (2011). Optimism, self-esteem, and soci al support as mediators of the relationships among workload, stress, and well-being in veterinary students. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 38, 60-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jvme.38.1.60
  • Hart S. G. (200 6). NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50, 904-908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909
  • Hart S. G., & Stavela nd L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task LoadIndex): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
  • Karasek R., & Theorell T. (1990). Healthy work, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Kember D., & Leung D. Y. (2006). Characterising a teaching and learni ng environment conducive to making demands on students while not making their workload excessive. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 185-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572074
  • Kember D.,Leung D. Y. P. 2009 Development of a questionnaire for assessing students' perceptions of the teaching and learning environment and its use in quality assurance Learning Environments Research 12 15-29, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10984-008-9050-7
  • Kyndt E., Dochy F., Struyven K., & Cascallar E. (2011). The direct and indirect effect of motivation for learning on students' approaches to learning through the perceptions of workload and task complexity. Hi gher Education Research & Development, 30, 135-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.501329
  • Lizzio A., Wilson K., & Simons R. (2002). University students' perceptions of the learning environm ent and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 27-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099359
  • López I. (2010). Generalización alámbito laboral de dos instrum entos de medida subjetiva de la carga mental [Generalization to workplace of two subjective mental workload instruments]. Madrid, Spain: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
  • Misra R., & McKean M. (2000). College student's academic stress and its relation to their anxiety, time management and leisure satisfaction. American Journal of Health Studies, 16, 41-52.
  • Oria V., Jenaro C., Meilán J., Zubiauz M., Mayor M., & Arana J. (2011). Carga de trabajo en el EEES: La necesidad de coordinación docente entre asignaturas [Workload in EHEA: Need for coordination between subjects]. IX Jornadas de Redes de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria. Diseño de buenas prácticas docentes en el contexto actual [IX Conference of Research Networks in Higher Education. Design of good teaching practices in the current context]. Alicante, Spain: Universidad de Alic ante.
  • Ramsden P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. Londres, UK: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203413937
  • Rueda B., Pérez-García A., & Bermúdez J. (2005). Estudio de la competencia percibida a partir de sus dos componentes: Expectativa de autoeficacia y expectativas de resultados [Study of perceived competition from its two components: Self-efficacy expectations and outcome expectations]. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 58, 75-87.
  • Ruiz-Gallardo J. R, Castaño S., Gómez-Alday J. J., & Valdés A. (2011). Assessing student workload in problem based learning: Relationships among teaching method, student workload an d achievement. A case study in Natural Sciences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 619-627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.11.001
  • Sánchez-Reinoso H. T., Franco P., & Estrems M. (2008). Metodología para la estimación de la carga de trabajo Del alumno dentro Del espacio europeo de educación superior. Experiencias en nuevas tecnologías de innovación docente [Methodology for estimating the student workload within the european higher education space. Experiences in teaching innovation technologies]. Jornadas sobre nuevas tendencias en la enseñanza de las ciencias y las ingenierías. Murcia, Spain: Consejo escolar de la Región de Murcia.
  • Siegrist J. (1996). Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 27-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27
  • Struyven K., Dochy F., Janssens S., & Gielen S. (2006). O n the dynamics of students' approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16, 279-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.001
  • Timmins F., & K aliszer M. (2002). Aspects of nurse education programmes that frequently cause stress to nursing students-fact-finding sample survey. Nurse Education Today, 22, 203-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2001.0698
  • Young M. S., & Stanton N. A. (2002). Malleable attentional resources theory: A new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44, 365-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/0018720024497709.
  • Young G., Zavelina L., & Hooper V. (2008). Assessment of workload using NASA task load index in perianesthesia nursing. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing , 23, 102-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2008.01.008
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet