Is there a deficit in recognition in old age?

  1. Ruiz Gallego-Largo, Trinidad
  2. Suengas Goenetxea, Aurora
  3. Simón López, Teresa
  4. Pastor, Noelia
Journal:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Year of publication: 2015

Volume: 27

Issue: 1

Pages: 26-31

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Psicothema

Abstract

Background: There is some debate over of the effect of aging on the ability to recognize previously processed information. The aim of the present study is to analyze, by means of different measurements, whether aging has differential effects on recall and recognition of visual and verbal materials. Method: A within-subject design was used to compare two groups of different age (younger, older) in tasks of recall and recognition of images and of the verbal descriptors exchanged in a conversation. Results: The results indicated that, unlike the recall and recognition of words, better in younger participants, the recall and recognition of images was equal in both groups, or even better in older participants when assessed by means of d'. Nevertheless, a more strict recently proposed measurement, the conditional probability for recall given recognition, yielded significant age differences in all instances. Besides, the conditional probability shows the aging changes usually found in the serial position curve: decline of the primacy effect, while maintenance of the recency effect. Conclusions: Results are explained according to the theories that postulate two components in the process of recognition (familiarity and recollection), which are independently affected by aging.

Bibliographic References

  • Bartlett, J.C., & Memon, A. (2007). Eyewitness memory in young and older adults. In R. Lindsay, R. Ross, D. Read & M. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 309-338).
  • Mahwah, NJ: LEA. Clarys, D., Isingrini, M., & Gana, K. (2002). Mediators of age-related differences in recollective experience in recognition memory. Acta Psychologica, 109, 315-329.
  • Craik, F.I.M., & McDowd, J.M. (1987). Age differences in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 474-479.
  • Danckert, S.L., & Craik, F.I.M. (2013). Does aging affect recall more than recognition memory? Psychology and Aging, 28, 902-909.
  • Howard, M.W., Bessette-Symons, B., Zhang, Y., & Hoyer, W. (2006). Aging selectively impairs recollection in recognition memory for pictures. Psychology and Aging, 21, 96-106.
  • Keightley, M.L., Winocur, G., Burianova, H., Hongwanishkul, D., & Grady, C. (2006). Age effects on social cognition: Faces tell a different story. Psychology and Aging, 21, 558-572.
  • Lobo, A., Saz, P., Marcos, G., & Grupo ZARADEMP (2002). MMSE, Examen Cognoscitivo Mini-Mental [Spanish adaptation of Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S., McHugh, P., & Fanjiang, G. (2001). MMSE, Mini Mental State Examination. PAR, Inc.]. Madrid: TEA.
  • López-Higes, R., Rubio, S., & Martín-Aragoneses, M.T. (2010). Comprensión gramatical en adultos mayores y con deterioro cognitivo: un estudio comparativo basado en el análisis discriminante y el escalamiento multidimensional [Grammatical comprehension in older adults, both normal and with cognitive impairment: A comparative study based on discrimination and multidimensional scaling techniques]. Psicothema, 22, 745-751.
  • Luo, L., & Craik, F.I.M. (2008). Aging and memory: A cognitive approach. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 53, 346-353.
  • Luo, L., Hendriks, T., & Craik, F.I.M. (2007). Age differences in recollection: Three patterns of enhanced encoding. Psychology and Aging, 22, 269-280.
  • Mueller, J.H., Wonderlich, S., & Dugan, K. (1986). Self-referent processing of age-specifi c material. Psychology and Aging, 1, 293-299.
  • Oberauer, K. (2005). Binding and inhibition in working memory: Individual and age differences in short-term recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 368-387.
  • Porras, C. & Salinas, J.M. (2011). Diseño de redes neuronales artifi ciales en Neurociencias [Artificial neural networks in Neurosciences]. Psicothema, 23, 738-744.
  • Ruiz-Gallego-Largo, T., Simón, T., & Suengas, A.G. (2012). Age differences in source monitoring and referent discrimination. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 20-28.
  • Sekuler, R., McLaughlin, C., Kahana, M., Wingfi eld, A., & Yotsumoto, Y. (2006). Short-term visual recognition and temporal order memory are both well-preserved in aging. Psychology and Aging, 21, 632-637.
  • Simón, T., Ruiz-Gallego-Largo, T., & Suengas, A.G. (2009). Memoria y envejecimiento: recuerdo, reconocimiento y sesgo positivo [Memory and aging: Recall, recognition and positive bias]. Psicothema, 21, 409-415.
  • Simón, T., Suengas, A.G., Ruiz-Gallego-Largo, T., & Bandrés, J. (2013). Positive bias is a defining characteristic of aging to the same extent as declining performance. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 704-714.
  • Soei, E., & Daum, I. (2008). Course of relational and non-relational recognition memory across the adult lifespan. Memory & Cognition, 15, 21-28.
  • Spencer, W.D., & Raz, N. (1995). Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 10, 527-539.
  • Spinnler, H., Della Sala, S., Bandera, R., & Baddeley, A. (1988). Dementia, ageing, and the structure of human memory. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 193-211.
  • Suengas, A.G., Ruiz-Gallego-Largo, T., & Simón, T. (2010). Age-related changes in recognition and response criterion. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 557-571.
  • Tractenberg, R.E., Aisen, P., & Chuang, Y. (2005). One-trial 10-item freerecall performance in Taiwanese older and near-older: A potencial screen for cognitive decline. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 20, 239-246.
  • Uttl, B., Henry, M., & Baltimore, K. (2007). Are smaller age differences on old/new recognition versus free recall tests artifacts of easy memory tests? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 374.
  • Yonelinas, A.P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.
Data source: Dialnet