Otro punto de vista sobre el caso Odyssey

  1. Goñi Etchervers, José Luís
  2. Fuentes Camacho, Víctor
Revista:
Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI)

ISSN: 1697-5197

Ano de publicación: 2014

Número: 28

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.17103/REEI.28.11 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI)

Resumo

The analysis of the legal issues raised by the Odyssey case might be addressed through various approaches: with regard to the most radical approach in terms of conflict of interest, it seems more appropriate to adopt, as starting point, a conciliatory position based on the idea that the access and dissemination of the culture and the underwater archaeology are fully compatible with the existence of national historical heritage and the preservation of the cultural identity of the flag state. Within such problems, the Private International Law question relating to the determination of the law applicable to the litigious course will vary radically with regard to the solutions that will be dispensed by a Spanish court under the ship and cargo from being considered as a unit or separately. The significant differences arisen in the Odyssey case in comparison with other cases lead us to refuse the thesis which considers the shipment as a unit along with the vessel, as well as to consider the shipment itself as an independent element. Once discarded their qualification as cultural property under special protection in terms of art. 40.1 LPHE, the governing law should be ascertained according to the conflict-of-laws rule stated in art. 10.1 Spanish Civil Code; however, as a result of the impossibility of the application of the lex rei sitae , it seems to prevail the general criteria provided by the Spanish law as lex fori, which grants the right of the property to the discoverer of the abandoned goods.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AA.VV., International Sales of Works of Art – La vente internationale d’oeuvres d’art (Coloquio. Ginebra, 11-13 abril 1985), París / Ginebra, 1988
  • AA.VV., La protection des biens culturels (3es. Journées franco-helleniques. Tesalónica. 1-4 octubre 1986), Journées de la societé de législation comparée, 1986, vol. 8, p. 424.
  • AA.VV., Comentarios al Código civil y compilaciones forales, t. I, Jaén, Edersa, 1978.
  • Andrés Sáenz de Santa María, P., Sistema de Derecho internacional público, 2ª ed., Cizur Menor, Civitas, 2012.
  • Aznar Gómez, M.Z., La protección internacional del patrimonio cultural subacuático con especial referencia al caso de España, Valencia, Tirant lo Blanch, 2004.
  • Aznar Gómez, M.Z., “Treasure Hunters, Sunken State Vessels and the 2001 UNESCO Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage”, Intl’ J. Marine and Coastal Law, 2010.
  • Carrera Hernández, F.J., Protección internacional del patrimonio cultural submarino, Salamanca, Edics. Univ., 2005.
  • Fuentes Camacho, V., El tráfico ilícito internacional de bienes culturales (Perspectiva del Derecho internacional privado español), Madrid, Eurolex, 1993.
  • Juste Ruiz, J., “Buques de Estado hundidos y protección del patrimonio cultural subacuático: el llamado <<Caso Odyssey>>”, Derecho internacional y comunitario ante los retos de nuestro tiempo. Homenaje a la Profesora Victoria Abellán Honrubia (A.M. Badía Martí, A. Pigrau Solé y A. Olesti Rayo, coords.), vol I, Madrid / Barcelona / Buenos Aires, Marcial Pons, 2009.
  • Koumantos, G., “La protection juridique internationale des biens culturels. Rapport introductif”, La protection juridique internationale des biens culturels (Actes du trezième colloque de droit européen. Delfos. 20-22 septiembre 1983), pp. 14-15.
  • Meryman, J.H., “Two Ways of Thinking about Cultural Property”, A.J.I.L., 1986.
  • Varmer, O.,“The Titanic as Underwarter Cultural Heritage: Challenges to its Legal International Protection”, Ocenan Development. & Internacional Law, 44, 2013.