Lucha de paradigmasleyes, ciencia y activismo en el mundo

  1. Alonso Puelles, Andoni
  2. Echeverría Ezponda, Javier
Journal:
Argumentos de razón técnica: Revista española de ciencia, tecnología y sociedad, y filosofía de la tecnología

ISSN: 1139-3327

Year of publication: 2014

Issue: 17

Pages: 21-38

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Argumentos de razón técnica: Revista española de ciencia, tecnología y sociedad, y filosofía de la tecnología

Abstract

This paper examines how scientific knowledge is affected in the 21th century, specially in relation to law and politics. The paper considers therefore new agents in that techno-scientific realm such as indexed journals, bibliometric analysis and proposes that open science movement is a reaction against a closed environment because of its counterproductivity. There are well known scientific institutions among scientists going open but it is clear the fight between closed and open science. Future is difficult to say but it is clear that a feedback between private and public is essential for scientific advancement. Turbo capitalism in science implies a lack of democracy for citizens.

Bibliographic References

  • BAWA, R. (2007) Patents, Nanotechnology and the US Patent Office ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/iprworkshop_bawa_en.pdf consultado el 14 de mayo de 2014.
  • BENKLER, Yohai (2006), The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, Cambridge, Yale University Press.
  • BOHANNON, J. (2013) The Cost of Knowledge, Science Vol. 342 no. 6154 pp. 60-65, http://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full, consultado el 14 de mayo de 2014.
  • BUSH, V. (1945), Science, the Endless Frontier, Washington, United States Government Printing Office, 1945, http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm, consultado el 14 de mayo de 2014.
  • BUSH, V. (1945) As We May Think, Atlanthic Monthy Review, Nueva York, http://web.mit.edu/STS.035/www/PDFs/think.pdf consultado el 14 de mayo de 2014.
  • FEYNAM, R (1959) There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/feynman.html consultado el 14 de mayo de 2014.
  • DRUCKER, P. (1985), Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles, New York, Harper & Row.
  • ECHEVERRÍA, J. (2003), La revolución tecnocientífica, Madrid, FCE.
  • KAHIN, B. (2010) The Patent Bubble... Still Growing Hufftington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-kahin/the-patent-bubble-stillg_b_129232.html consultado el 14 de mayo de 2014.
  • LAFUENTE, A. ((2007), El carnaval de la tecnociencia, Madrid, Gadir
  • LAFUENTE, A., Alonso, A., Rodríguez, J. (2013) ¡Todos sabios! Ciencia ciudadana y conocimiento expandido. Cátedra, Madrid.
  • LEVY, E., MARDEN, E., WARREN, HARTELL, D., & FILATÉ, I (2010) Patent Pools and Genomics: Navigating a Course to Open Science?, Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law, Volume 16, Number 1, 75.
  • MERTON, Robert K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science, Science 159 (3810), 56–63.
  • SCHEKMAN, R. (2013) http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/ 2013/dec/09/how-journals-nature-science-cell-damage-science.
  • SCHMID, John (2009), “Congress deals funding blow to Patent Office Budget strip $100 million provision for backlogged agency”, http://www.jsonline.com/business/80244907.html consultado el 14 de mayo de 2014.
  • SHERMAN, E (2010) Patent Office Admits the Truth: Things Are a Disaster, CBS http://www.cbsnews.com/news/patent-office-admits-the-truth-things-are-adisaster/.
  • STALLMAN, Richard (2000), “¿Biopiratas o biocorsarios?” http://sindominio.net/biblioweb-old/telematica/bio.html consultado el 14 de mayo de 2014.
  • STERLING, B. (1992) Free as the Free Air as Water Free as Knowledge http://vserver1.cscs.lsa.umich.edu/~crshalizi/Sterling/Free_as_the_Air_Free_as_ Water_Free_as_Knowledge.html consultado el 14 de mayo de 2014.
Data source: Dialnet