Aspectos éticos en la participación de personas con diversidad funcional en proyectos de investigación tecnológica

  1. Sainz de Salces, Fausto Javier 1
  2. Bustamante Donas, Javier 2
  1. 1 Technosite
  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revue:
Revista Española de Discapacidad (REDIS)

ISSN: 2340-5104

Année de publication: 2014

Volumen: 2

Número: 1

Pages: 165-174

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5569/2340-5104.02.01.09 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista Española de Discapacidad (REDIS)

Résumé

The participation of people with disabilities in technological research projects has certain peculiarities on an ethical level that should be considered by all those involved in the process. The study of these considerations from a theoretical point of view, also supported by praxis, lead us to present an approach to the practical problems posed by these activities. In the absence of established protocols, this paper presents an integrated ethical review framework that considers following parameters as fundamental proper treatment, respect for privacy, stimulus to express opinions, correct management of the personal relationships and the disappointment of the participating persons.

Références bibliographiques

  • Barcenilla, J. y Tijus, C. (2012) Ethical issues raised by the new orientations in ergonomics and living labs. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation. Vol. 41,0, pp.5259 – 5265. IOS Press.
  • Chen, L., Gillenson, M.L., y Sherrell, D.L. (2002) Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information and Management, n. 39, 705-719.
  • Courtney, K. L. (2008), “Privacy and senior willingness to adopt smart home information technology in residential care facilities”. Methods Inf Med. 47(1), 76-81.
  • Gram-Hansen, S. B. (2009), “Towards an approach to ethics and HCI development based on Løgstrup’s ideas”. In T. Gross et al. (Eds.), Interact 2009, Part I, Springer Verlag, LNCS 5726, 200-203.
  • Manders-Huits, N. (2010), “What values in design? The challenge of incorporating moral values into design”. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17, 271–328.
  • Mordini, E. et al. (2009), “Senior citizens and the ethics of e-inclusion”. Ethics and Information Technology 11, 203-220.
  • Müller, S. y Sixsmith, A. (2008), “User requirements for ambient assisted
  • living: results of the SOPRANO project”. Gerontechnology 7 (2), 168.
  • Nys, H. (2012) New European Rules Regarding the Approval of Clinical Trials, the Role of Ethics Committees and the Protection of Subjects. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis.VoL. 60, Issue 6, 405-414.
  • Nickel, P. J., (2011) Ethics in e-trust and e-trustworthiness : the case of direct computer-patient interfaces. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(4), 355-363.
  • Stalker, K. (1998) Some Ethical and Methodological Issues in
  • Research with People with Learning Difficulties. Disability & Society, 13:1, 5-19.
  • Swain, J., Heyman, B. y Gillman, M. (1998), “Public Research, Private Concerns: Ethical issues in the use of open-ended interviews with people who have learning difficulties”, Disability and Society 13 (1), 21-36.
  • Thiel, C. E. et al. (2012) Leader Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: Strategies for Sensemaking. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (1):49-64.
  • Turilli, M. (2007), “Ethical protocol design”. Ethics and Information Technology 9, 49-62.
  • Vines J, et al. (2012) Why involve people in design?. In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Extended Abstracts (CHI EA '12). 2012, Austin, Texas: ACM Press.
La source de données: Dialnet