¿Cómo mide el riesgo el observador imparcial?

  1. Antonio J. Heras 1
  2. David Teira 2
  1. 1 Departamento de Economía Financiera y Contabilidad Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  2. 2 Departamento de Lógica, Historia y Filosofía de la Ciencia UNED
Revue:
Crítica: revista hispanoamericana de filosofía

ISSN: 0011-1503

Année de publication: 2015

Volumen: 47

Número: 139

Pages: 47-65

Type: Article

DOI: 10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2015.525 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

D'autres publications dans: Crítica: revista hispanoamericana de filosofía

Résumé

We study the link between the concepts of risk and equality in the argument of the impartial observer. The conception of justice that this latter would choose is grounded on the purity of the choice procedure. However, if we model this choice using the standard risk measurements in mathematical finance, there is an implicit preference for the degree of inequality that the chosen outcome will yield. This should make us reconsider the neutrality of the impartial observer’s proceduralism.