El párrafo como unidad discursivaconsideraciones de forma y contenido relativas a su demarcación y estructuración

  1. Martínez Caro, Elena
Journal:
Estudios de Lingüística del Español (ELiEs)

ISSN: 1139-8736

Year of publication: 2014

Issue: 35

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDDD editor

More publications in: Estudios de Lingüística del Español (ELiEs)

Abstract

In dealing with linguistics beyond the sentence the paragraph is considered as one of the intermediate units between the sentence and the text. Rather than a purely-orthographic unit, basically delimited by indentation, the paragraph is seen as a structural unit which exhibits certain formal features, largely, but also of content, which help set up its boundaries (cf. , among others, Brown & Yule 1983, Hinds 1977, Ji 2002, Longacre 1979). The study of such features, some of them depending on the specific text type, proves an interesting task in order to justify the importance of the paragraph as discourse unit. This paper intends to contribute to the study of these aspects, on the basis of a corpus of written texts from weekly news magazines in Spanish. From the point of the content of the paragraph but with relevance on its formal expression, a fundamental notion is that of discourse topic. Topic, and its hierarchy, is closely related to the organisation of discourse and affects other notions such as that of theme, thematic progression, topic-shift markers and the notion of episode, as a unit which can integrate various paragraphs. The paragraph is considered as a unit with internal coherence, on the one hand, and an adequate connection with the linguistic context, on the other. Depending on the communicative content of the paragraph, some studies distinguish different types of paragraph (cf. Siepmann et al. 2008) and others refer to an internal structure in the paragraph (cf. Hannay & Mackenzie 2002). In terms of types of paragraph and their characteristics, there are interesting differences in relation to the contrast among languages and text typology. Among the linguistic strategies that the corpus analysis suggests in terms of the paragraph transitions there are the following: a) adverbial expressions and connectors of different type and meaning, b) expressions reflecting the different patterns of thematic progression (cf. Daneš 1974, Fries 1983), c) focus constructions such as cleft and identifying constructions, d) evaluative and evidential expressions and e) the use of rhetorical questions.

Bibliographic References

  • Biber, Douglas; Johansson, Stig; Leech, Geoffrey; Conrad, Susan y Finegan, Edward. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Londres: Longman.
  • Brown, Gillian; Yule, George. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Butler, Christopher S. 2003. Structure and Function. A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories. Vol. 2: From Clause to Discourse and Beyond. Amsterdam y Filadelfia: John Benjamins.
  • Calsamiglia, Helena; Tusón, Amparo. 1999. Las cosas del decir. Manual de análisis del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.
  • Chafe, Wallace L. 1979. The flow of thought and the flow of language. En T. Givón. ed. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax. Nueva York: Academic Press, pp. 159-182.
  • DaneÅ¡, FrantiÅ¡ek. 1974. Functional Sentence Perspective and the organization of the text. En F. DaneÅ¡. ed. Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. Praga: Academia, pp. 106-128.
  • Downing, Angela; Locke, Philip. 2006. English Grammar: a University Course. 2ª ed. Abingdon y Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Fries, Peter. 1983. On the status of theme: Arguments from discourse. En J. Petöfi y E. Sözer. eds. Micro and Macro Connexity of Texts. Hamburgo: Helmut Buske.
  • Giora, Rachel. 1997. Discourse coherence and theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory. Journal of Pragmatics 27.1: 17-34.
  • Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: an introduction. En Givón, T. ed. Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study. Amsterdam y Filadelfia: John Benjamins, pp. 1-41.
  • Gutiérrez Ordoñez, Salvador. 1997. Temas, remas, focos, tópicos y comentarios. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
  • Halliday, Michael A.K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3: 177-274.
  • Hannay, Mike; Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2009. Effective Writing in English: a Sourcebook. 2ª ed. Bussum: Coutinho.
  • Hearst, Marti A. 1997. TextTiling: segmenting text into multi-paragraph subtopic passages. Computational Linguistics 23.1: 33-64.
  • Hinds, John. 1977. Paragraph structure and pronominalization. Papers in Linguistics 10: 77-99.
  • Hinds, John. 1978. Levels of structure within the paragraph. Proceedings of the 4h Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 598-609.
  • Ji, Shaojun. 2002. Identifying episode transitions. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1257- 1271.
  • Ji, Shaojun. 2008. What do paragraph divisions indicate in narrative texts? Journal of Pragmatics 40: 1719-1730.
  • Koen, Frank; Becker, Alton; Young, Richard. 1969. The psychological reality of the paragraph. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 8.1: 49-53.
  • Longacre, Robert E. 1979. The paragraph as a grammatical unit. En T. Givón. ed. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax. Nueva York: Academic Press, pp. 115-134.
  • Longacre, Robert E. 1980. An apparatus for the identification of paragraph types. Notes on Translation 15: 5-22. Summer Institute of Linguistics.
  • Martínez Caro, Elena. 2014. The expression of evaluation in weekly news magazines in English. En Thompson, G. y Alba-Juez, L. eds. Evaluation in Context. Amsterdam y Filadelfia: John Benjamins, pp. 321-343.
  • Moreno Cabrera, Juan Carlos. 1993. Las funciones informativas: las perífrasis de relativo y otras construcciones perifrásticas. En I. Bosque y V. Demonte. eds. Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Vol. 3. Entre la oración y el discurso. Morfología. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 4245-4302.
  • Semino, Elena. 2009. Language in newspapers. En J. Culpeper, F. Katamba, P. Kerswill, R. Wodak y T. McEnery. Eds. English Language: Description, Variation and Context. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 439–453.
  • Siepmann, Dirk; Gallagher, John D.; Hannay, Mike; Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2008. Writing in English: A Guide for Advanced Learners. Tübingen: A. Francke.
  • Siewierska, Anna. 1991. Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.
  • Stark, Heather. 1988. What do paragraph markers do? Discourse Processes 11.3: 275- 304.
  • van Dijk, Teun. 1988. News Analysis. Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Wilson, Deirdre. 1998. Discourse, coherence and relevance: a reply to Rachel Giora.
Data source: Dialnet