Adaptación de las "Escalas de afecto positivo y negativo" (PANAS) en una muestra general española

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abad, F. J., Díez, J. O., Gil, V. P. y García, C. G. (2011). Análisis factorial confirmatorio. En F. J. Abad, J. O. Díez, V. P. Gil y C. G. García (dirs.), Medición en ciencias socialesy de la salud (pp. 341-380). Madrid: Síntesis.
• Arbuckle, J. L. (2009). Amos (version 18.0) [software]. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
• Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G. y Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893-897.
• Beck A.T., Steer R.A. y Brown G.K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory-second edition manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
• Byrne, B.M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: basic concepts, applications and programming (2a ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Chang, L. y Krosnick, J. A. (2009). National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing versus the internet: comparing sample representativeness and response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 641-678.
• Clark, L. A. y Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316.
• Crawford, J. R. y Henry, J. D. (2004). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 245-265.
• Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R. J. y Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
• Diener, E., Larsen, R. J., Levine, S. y Emmons, R. A. (1985). Intensity and frequency: dimensions underlying positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1253-1265.
• Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S. y Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143-156.
• Dufey, M. y Fernández, A. M. (2012). Validez y confiabilidad del Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) en estudiantes universitarios chilenos. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 34, 157-173.
• Extremera, N. y Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2014). The Subjective Happiness Scale: translation and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a Spanish version. Social Indicators Research, 119, 473-481.
• First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M. y Williams, J. B. W. (1996). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Clinician Version (SCID-CV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.
• First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M. y Williams, J. B. W. (1999). Entrevista clínica estructurada para los trastornos del eje I del DSM-IV. Versión clínica. Barcelona: Masson.
• Fricker, S., Galesic, M., Tourangeau, R. y Yan, T. (2005). An experimental comparison of web and telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69, 370-392.
• Gaudreau, P., Sanchez, X. y Blondin, J. P. (2006). Positive and negative affective states in a performance-related setting: testing the factorial structure of the PANAS across two samples of french-canadian participants. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 240-249.
• Hamid, P. N. y Cheng, S. T. (1996). The development and validation of an index of emotional disposition and mood state: the Chinese Affect Scale. Education and Psychological Measurement, 56, 995-1014.
• Hervás, G. y Vázquez, C. (2013). Construction and validation of a measure of integrative well-being in seven languages: the Pemberton Happiness Index. Health & Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 66.
• Howell, R. T., Rodzon, K. S., Kurai, M. y Sanchez, A. H. (2010). A validation of well-being and happiness surveys for administration via the internet. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 775-784.
• Hu, L. y Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
• Huebner, E. S. y Dew, T. (1995). Preliminary validation of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule with adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 286-293.
• IBM (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 [software]. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
• Joiner, T. E., Jr., Sandín, B., Chorot, P., Lostao, L. y Marquina, G. (1997). Development and factor analytic validation of the SPANAS among women in Spain: (more) cross-cultural convergence in the structure of mood. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 600615.
• Jolly, J. B., Dyck, M. J., Kramer, T. A. y Wherry, J. N. (1994). Integration of positive and negative affectivity and cognitive content-specificity: improved discrimination of anxious and depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 544-552.
• Killgore, W. D. S. (2000). Evidence for a third factor on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule in a college student sample. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 147-152.
• Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2a ed.). Nueva York, NY: Guilford.
• Leue, A. y Beauducel, A. (2011). The PANAS structure revisited: on the validity of a bifactor model in community and forensic samples. Psychological Assessment, 23, 215-225.
• Lobbestael, J., Leurgans, M. y Arntz, A. (2011). Inter-rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DsM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID I) and Axis II Disorders (SCID II). Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18, 75-79.
• Lonigan, C. J., Hooe, E. S., David, C. F. y Kistner, J. A. (1999). Positive and negative affectivity in children: confirmatory factor analysis of a two-factor model and its relation to symptoms of anxiety and depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 374-386.
• Lucas, R. E., Diener, C. y Larsen, R. J. (2003). Measuring positive emotions. En S. J. Lopez y B. K. Snyder (dirs.), Positive psychological assessment: a handbook of models and measures (pp. 201-218). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Lyubomirsky, S. y Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137-155.
• Magán, I., Sanz, J. y García-Vera, M. P. (2008). Psychometric properties of a Spanish version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) in general population. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 626-640.
• Mehrabian, A. (1997). Comparison of the PAD and PANAS as models for describing emotions and for differentiating anxiety from depression. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 19, 331-357.
• Melvin, G. A. y Molloy, G. N. (2000). Some psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule among Australian youth. Psychological Reports, 86, 1209- 1212.
• Messick, S. (1989). Validity. En R. L. Linn (dir.), Educational measurement. Nueva York, NY: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
• Moriondo, M., de Palma, P., Medrano, L. A. y Murillo, P. (2012). Adaptación de la Escala de afectividad positiva y negativa (PANAS) a la población de adultos de la ciudad de Córdoba: análisis psicométricos preliminares. Universitas Psychologica, 11, 187-196.
• Navarro, A. B., Martínez, B. B. y Delgado, J. B. (2013). Bienestar emocional en la vejez avanzada: estudio comparativo por edad y género. Psychology, Society & Education, 5, 41-57.
• Robles, R. y Páez, F. (2003). El estudio sobre la traducción al español y las propiedades psicométricas de las Escalas de afecto positivo y negativo (PANAS). Salud Mental, 26, 69-75.
• Rodríguez, C. y Church, A. T. (2003). The structure and personality correlates of affect in Mexico: evidence of cross-cultural comparability using the Spanish language. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 211-230.
• Sandín, B., Chorot, P., Lostao, L., Joiner, T. E., Santed, M. A. y Valiente, R. M. (1999). Escalas PANAS de afecto positivo y negativo: validación factorial y convergencia transcultural. Psicothema, 11, 37-51.
• Sanz, J. (2001). Un instrumento para evaluar la eficacia de los procesamientos de inducción de estado de ánimo: la "Escala de valoración del estado de ánimo" (EVEA). Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 27, 71-110.
• Sanz, J., Navarro, M. E. y Vázquez, C. (2003). Adaptación española del Inventario para la depresión de Beck-II (BDI-II): 1. propiedades psicométricas en estudiantes universitarios. Análisisy Modificación de Conducta, 29, 239-288.
• Schmukle, S. C., Egloff, B. y Burns, L. R. (2002). The relationship between positive and negative affect in the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 463-475.
• Terraciano, A., McCrae, R. R. y Costa, P. T. (2003). Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 131-141.
• Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short- form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 227-242.
• Van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P. y Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 486-492.
• Vázquez, C., Duque, A. y Hervás, G. (2013). Satisfaction with Life Scale in a representative sample of Spanish adults: validation and normative data. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, E82.
• Vázquez, C. y Hervás, G. (2010). Perceived benefits after terrorist attacks: the role of positive and negative emotions. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 154-163.
• Watson, D. y Clark, L. A. (1999). The PANAS-X: manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-expanded form. Recuperado desde: http://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=psychology_pubs
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A. y Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
• Watson, D. y Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235.
• Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A. y Erikson, P. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value in Health, 8, 94-104.
• Yárnoz-Yaben, S., Comino, P. y Sansinenea, E. (2014). La PNA-10, una escala breve para evaluar el afecto positivo y negativo en español. Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 22, 327-343.
• Zanarini, M. C., Skodol, A. E., Bender, D., Dolan, R., Sanislow, C., Schaefer, E., Morey, L. C., Grilo, C. M., shea, M. T., McGlashan, T. H. y Gunderson, J. G. (2000). The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorder Study: reliability of axis I and II diagnoses. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 291-299.
• Zautra, A. J., Berkhof, J. y Nicolson, N. A. (2002). Changes in affect interrelations as a function of stressful events. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 309-318.