Diferencias en las prevalencias de agresión en la pareja según la "Escala de tácticas para el conflicto revisada"informe individual y diádico

Referencias bibliográficas

• Archer, J. (1999). Assessment of the reliability of the Conflict Tactics Scales: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1263-1289.
• Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A metaanalytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651.
• Armstrong, T. G., Wernke, J. Y., Medina, K. L., & Schafer, J. (2002). Do partners agree about the occurrence of violence? A review of the current literature. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 3, 181-193.
• Caetano, R., Field, C., Ramisetty-Mikler, S., & Lipsky, S. (2009). Agreement on reporting of physical, psychological, and sexual violence among white, black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 1318-1337.
• Caetano, R., Schafer, J., Field, C., & Nelson, S. M. (2002). Agreement on reports of intimate partner violence among white, black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 1308-1322.
• Calvete, E., Corral, S., & Estévez, A. (2007). Factor structure and validity of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales for Spanish women. Violence Against Women, 13, 1072-1087.
• Capaldi, D. M., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2012). Informing intimate partner violence prevention efforts: Dyadic, developmental, and contextual considerations. Prevention Science, 13, 323-328.
• Corral, S., & Calvete, E. (2006). Evaluación de la violencia en las relaciones de pareja mediante las Escalas de tácticas para conflictos: estructura factorial y diferencias de género en jóvenes [Assessment of violence in intimate relationships by means of the Conflict Tactics Scales: Factor structure and gender differences in youngsters]. Psicología Conductual, 14, 215-233.
• Desmarais, S. L., Reeves, K. A., Nicholls, T. L., Telford, R. P., & Fiebert, M. S. (2012a). Prevalence of physical violence in intimate relationships, Part 1: Rates of male and female victimization. Partner Abuse, 3, 140-169.
• Desmarais, S. L., Reeves, K. A., Nicholls, T. L., Telford, R. P., & Fiebert, M. S. (2012b). Prevalence of physical violence in intimate relationships, part 2: Rates of male and female perpetration. Partner Abuse, 3, 170-198.
• Esquivel-Santoveña, E. E., & Dixon, L. (2012). Investigating the true rate of physical intimate partner violence: A review of nationally representative surveys. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 208-219.
• González, O. I., Echeburúa, E., & de Corral, P. (2008). Variables significativas en las relaciones violentas en parejas jóvenes: Una revisión [Relevant variables related to intimate partner violence in young couples: A review]. Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 16, 207-225.
• Graña, J. L., Andreu J. M., Peña, M. E., & Rodríguez M. J. (2013). Validez factorial y fiabilidad de la “Escala de tácticas para el conflicto revisada” (Revised Conflict Tactics Scale, CTS-2) en población adulta española [Factor validity and reliability of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS-2) in a Spanish adult population]. Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 21, 525-543.
• Graña, J. L., & Cuenca, M. L. (2014). Prevalence of psychological and physical intimate partner aggression in Madrid (Spain): A dyadic analysis. Psicothema, 26, 343-348.
• Heyman, R. E., & Slep, A. M. S. (2006). Creating and field-testing diagnostic criteria for partner and child maltreatment. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 397-408.
• IBM (2010). SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0. Armonk, NY: Autor.
• John, O. P., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In H. T. Reiss, & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 339-369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Johnson, M. P. (2011). Gender and types of intimate partner violence: A response to an anti-feminist literature review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 289-296.
• Jones, N. T., Ji, P., Beck, M., & Beck, N. (2002). The reliability and validity of the revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS-R) in a female incarcerated population. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 441-457.
• Jose, A., & O’Leary, K. D. (2009). Prevalence of partner aggression in representative and clinic samples. In K. D. O´Leary, & E. M. Woodin (Eds.), Psychological and physical aggression in couples: causes and interventions (pp.15-35).Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
• Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
• Koss, M. E., & Gidycz, C. A. (1985). Sexual experiences survey: Reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 422-423.
• Loinaz, I., Echeburúa, E., Ortiz-Tallo, M., & Amor, P. J. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS-R) in a Spanish sample of partner-violent men. Psicothema, 24, 142-148.
• Lucente, S. W., Fals-Stewart, W., Richards, H. J., & Goscha, J. (2001). Factor structure and reliability of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales for incarcerated female substance abusers. Journal of Family Violence, 16, 437-450.
• Marshall, A. D., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2002).Varying forms of husband sexual aggression: Predictors and subgroup differences. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 286-296.
• Marshall, A. D., Panuzio, J., Makin-Byrd, K. N., Taft, C. T., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2011). A multilevel examination of interpartner intimate partner violence and psychological aggression reporting concordance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 364-377.
• Montes-Berges, B. (2008). Tactics to resolve conflicts and romantic jealousy in intimate relationships: Adaptation and analysis of the CTS-2 and CR scales. Estudios de Psicología, 29, 221-234.
• Newton, R. R., Connelly, C. D., & Landsverk, J. A. (2001). An examination of measurement characteristics and factorial validity of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 317-335.
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
• O’Leary, K. D., & Williams, M. C. (2006). Agreement about acts of aggression in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 656-662.
• Rathus, J. H., & Feindler, E. L. (2004). Assessment of partner violence: A handbook for researchers and practitioners. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Salis, K. L., Salwen, J., & O'Leary, K. D. (2014). The predictive utility of psychological aggression for intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 5, 83-97.
• Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350-353.
• Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and aggression: The Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS). Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
• Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
• Szinovacz, M. E. (1983). Using couple data as a methodological tool: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 633-644.
• Szinovacz, M. E., & Egley, L. C. (1995). Comparing one-partner and couple data on sensitive marital behaviors: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 995-1010.