Mecanismos interpersonales de actitud y alineación en un debate

  1. Hidalgo Downing, Raquel 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Journal:
Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación

ISSN: 1576-4737

Year of publication: 2015

Issue Title: Géneros del discurso y pragmática

Issue: 64

Pages: 84-103

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5209/REV_CLAC.2015.V64.51279 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación

Abstract

In this article we aim at studying how speakers mark alignment in discourse. We define alignment as the speaker’s point of view or footing in relation to an object (for instance, a topic or issue in conversation or a debate) but also and mainly in relation to the other participants in the interaction. The aim of the study is to identify the linguistic procedures used by speakers to mark alignment, and also to show how in face-to-face interaction the creation of alignment and therefore the (inter)subjective construction of discourse is the result of a process of interpersonal negotiation. With this purpose in mind, we have attempted to identify the procedures used by speakers to mark alignment such as partial repetition, recycling of linguistic material, or personal pronouns and stance markers like pronouns, verbs of cognition and communication and adverbs.

Bibliographic References

  • Adetunji, A. (2006): Inclusion and exclusion in political discourse: deixis in Olusegun Obasanjo's speeches. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5 (2): 177-191.
  • Conrad, S. y D. Biber (2000): Averbial marking of stance in speech and writing. En: Hunston y Thompson (eds.), 56-74.
  • Du Bois, J. W. (2007): The stance triangle. En: Englebretson (ed.), 139-182.
  • Englebretson, R. (2007) (ed.): Stancetaking in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Goffman, E. (1981): Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Haddington, P. (2007): Positioning and alignment as activitites of stancetaking in news interviews. En: Englebretson (ed.), 283-319.
  • Helfrich, U. (2011): Face management en la comunicación política. Un análisis discursivo multimodal. En: Held, G. y U. Helfrich (eds.), Cortesia-Politesse-Cortesía. La cortesia verbale nella prospettiva romanistica/La politesse verbale dans une perspective romaniste/La cortesía verbal desde la perspectiva romanística. Fráncfort del Meno: Lang, 117-139.
  • Hidalgo Downing, R. (2009a): Políticos y ciudadanos. Análisis conversacional de la entrevista política. Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada (RAeL) 9, 89-101.
  • Hidalgo Downing, R. (2009b): La gestión de la imagen del político en la interacción cara a cara. Español Actual 92, 122-155.
  • Hidalgo Downing, R. y Ma. J. Nieto y Otero (2014). Estrategias de vinculación afectiva y entonación en un debate político. Oralia 17, 211-237.
  • Hunston, S. y G. Thompson (eds.) (2000): Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: OUP.
  • Hyland, K. (2005): Stance and engagement: a model of stance in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7 (2), 173-192.
  • Jones, C. y E. Ventola (eds.) (2008): From Language to Multimodality. New Developments in the Study of Ideational Meaning. Londres: Equinox.
  • Lavid, J. (2008): The grammar of emotion in English and Spanish: a systemicfunctional approach. En: Jones y Ventola (eds.), 67-87.
  • Lim, T.-S. (2007): Facework and interpersonal relationships. En: Ting-Toomey, S. (ed.), The Challenge of Facework. Nueva York: State University of New York Press, 210-223.
  • Martin, J. R. (2000): Beyond exchange: appraisal systems in English. En: Hunston y Thompson (eds.), 142-175.
  • López Serena, A. y E. Méndez García de Paredes (2009): La interrupción como mecanismo regulativo de las interacciones verbales. Español Actual 92, 159-221.
  • O'Keefe, A. (2006): Investigating Media Discourse. Londres: Routledge.
  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992): Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. En: Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 25. San Diego: Academic Press, 1-65.
  • Scott, C. (2008): Construing attitude and experience in discourse-the interaction of the transitivity and appraisal systems. En: Jones y Ventola (eds.), 87-111.
  • Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007): Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics 39/4, 639-656.
  • Thompson, G. y S. Hunston (2000): Evaluation: an introduction. En: Hunston y Thompson (eds.), 1-26.
  • Thompson, G. y L. Alba Juez (eds.) (2014): Evaluation in Context. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Walter, M. A. y otros (2012): That's your evidence? Classifying stance in online political debate. Decision Support Systems 53/4, 719-729. 〈 http://acawiki.org/That%E2%80%99s-your-evidence%3F:-Classifying-stance-in-online-political-debate 〉. Última consulta: 06-05-2015.
Data source: Dialnet