Intensity of Love in a Community Sample of Spanish Couples in the Region of Madrid

  1. Cuenca Montesino, María Luisa
  2. Graña Gómez, José Luis
  3. O'Leary, K. Daniel
Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 18

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2015.79 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Intensity of love was examined in a representative community sample of 2,988 couples, from the Region of Madrid (Spain). Gender differences revealed no significant differences in intensity of love. Twenty-five percent of the participants who were in a relationship of less than 10 years and eleven percent of the participants in a relationship of more than 30 years reported being �very intensely in love� F(3, 5.972) = 191.32, p < .001, ?p 2 = 0.08. The cognitive variables, thinking positively about the partner and thinking about the partner when apart, were significant predictors of the intensity of long-term love for both men and women. Affection was also positively associated with intense love for men (r = .47, p < .001) and women (r = .52, p < .001); sexual intercourse was for women (r = .36, p < .001) but not for men. Wanting to know the whereabouts of partner was associated with the intensity of love for women (r = .15, p < .05), but not for men. Engaging in novel activities with partner was not associated with intense love for male or females. As predicted, love declined significantly in the first decade of marriage, but not much after that. The percentage of men and women who reported being intensely in love was lower than that obtained in the U.S.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Acevedo B. P. (2008). The neural basis of long-term romantic love. (Published doctoral dissertation). Stony Brook: NY: The Graduate School, Stony Brook University.
  • Acevedo B. P., & Aron A. (2009). Does a long-term relationship kill romantic love? Review of General Psychology, 13, 59–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014226
  • Adler-Baeder F., Higginbotham B., & Lamke L. (2004). Putting empirical knowledge to work: Linking research and programming on marital quality. Family Relations, 53, 537–546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0197-6664.2004.00063.x
  • Aquilino W. S. (1994). Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use: A field experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 210–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/269419
  • Barrón López de Rueda A., Martínez-Íñigo D., de Paúl P., & Yela C. (1999). Romantic Beliefs and Myths in Spain. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2, 64–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600005461
  • Bradbury T. N., & Karney B. R. (2004). Understanding and altering the longitudinal course of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 862–879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00059.x
  • Buss D. M. (2006). The evolution of love. In R. Sternberg & K. Weis (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 65–86). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Cohen S., Klein D. N., & O'Leary K. D. (2007). The role of separation/divorce in relapse into and recovery from major depression. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 855–873. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407507084187
  • Currivan D. B., Nyman A. L., Turner C. F., & Biener L. (2004). Does telephone audio computer-assisted selfinterviewing improve the accuracy of prevalence estimates of youth smoking? Evidence from the UMass Tobacco Study. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 542–564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh039
  • Diener E., & Lucas R. E. (2000). Explaining differences in societal levels of happiness: Relative standards need fulfillment, culture and evaluation theory. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 41–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010076127199
  • Diener E., Oishi S., & Lucas R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056
  • Donnelly D. A. (1993). Sexually inactive marriages. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 171–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499309551698
  • Esteban Galarza M. L., & Távora Rivero A. (2008). Romantic love and social subordination of women: Revisions and proposals. Anuario de Psicología/The UB Journal of Psychology, 39, 59–73. http://hdl.handle.net/10481/22465
  • Ferrer V., Bosh E., Navarro C., Ramis M. C., & García E. (2008). El concepto de amor en España. [The concept of love in a Spanish representative simple]. Psicothema, 20, 589–595.
  • Ferrer Pérez V. A., Bosch E., & Navarro Guzmán C. (2010). Los mitos románticos en España [Myths romantic in Spain]. Boletín de Psicología, 99, 7–31.
  • Fisher H. E. (2006). The drive to love. In R. Sternberg & K. Weis (Eds.). The new psychology of love (pp. 87–115). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Gottman J. M., & Silver N. (1999). The seven principles for making marriage work. New York, NY: Crown Publishers.
  • Graham J. M., Liu Y. J., & Jeziorski J. L. (2006). The dyadic adjustment scale: A reliability generalization metaanalysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 701–717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00284.x
  • Graham J. M., Diebels K. J., & Barnow Z. B. (2011). The reliability of relationship satisfaction: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(1), 39–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022441
  • Hatfield E., & Rapson R. L. (1993). Love, sex, and intimacy: Their psychology, biology, and history. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  • Hatfield E., & Sprecher S. (1986). Measuring passionate love in intimate relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 9, 383–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971(86)80043-4
  • Hatfield E. C., Pillemer J. T., O’Brien M. U., & Le Y. L. (2008). The endurance of love: Passionate and companionate love in newlywed and long-term marriages. Interpersona 2, 35–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v2i1.17
  • Jose A., Rajaram S., O'Leary K. D., & Williams M. C. (2010). Memory for partner-related stimuli: Free recall and frequency estimation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 658–670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407510369144
  • Jose A., O’Leary K. D., Gomez J. L. G., & Foran H. M. (2014). Risk factors for men’s intimate physical aggression in Spain. Journal of Family Violence, 29, 287–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9589-2
  • Kelley H. H., & Thibaut J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Kim J., & Hatfield E. (2004). Love types and subjective well-being: A cross-cultural study. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 173–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2004.32.2.173
  • Lee J. A. (1977). A typology of styles of loving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 173–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014616727700300204
  • Masuda M. (2003). Meta-analyses of love scales: Do various love scales measure the same psychological constructs? Japanese Psychological Research, 45, 25–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-5884.00030
  • Myers J. E., & Shurts W. M. (2002). Measuring positive emotionality: A review of instruments assessing love. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 238–254.
  • O’Leary K. D., Acevedo B. P., Aron A., Huddy L., & Mashek D. (2012). Is long-term love more than a rare phenomenon? If so, what are its correlates? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 241–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1948550611417015
  • Riehl-Emde A., Thomas V., & Willi J. (2003). Love: An important dimension in marital research and therapy. Family Process, 42, 253–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.42205.x
  • Sternberg R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119
  • Ubillos S., Zubieta E., Páez D., Deschamps J. C., Ezeiza A., & Vera A. (2001). Amor, cultura y sexo [Love, culture and sex]. Revista Electrónica de Motivación y Emoción. 4, 8–9.
  • Weiss R. L. (1980). Strategic behavior marital therapy: Toward a model for assessment and intervention. In J. P. Vincent (Ed.), Advances in Family Intervention, Assessment, and Theory (Vol. 1, pp. 229–271). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Whisman M. A., & Delinsky S. S. (2002). Marital satisfaction and an information-processing measure of partner-schemas. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26, 617–627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020305226067
  • Yela C. (1997). Curso temporal de los componentes básicos del amor a lo largo de la relación de pareja. [Temporal course of basic components of love along the couple relationship]. Psicothema, 9, 1–15.
  • Yela C. (2000). Predictors of and factors related to loving and sexual satisfaction for men and women. European Review of Applied Psychology/Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée 50, 235–243.
  • Yela C. (2003). La otra cara del amor: Mitos, paradojas y problemas. [The other side of love: Myths, paradoxes and problems]. Psicología Social 1, 263–267.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet