The gendered division of housework

  1. Juan Fernández 1
  2. M. Ángeles Quiroga 1
  3. Sergio Escorial 1
  4. Jesús Privado 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España)
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 28

Número: 2

Páginas: 130-136

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Resumen

Background: In spite of the verifiable achievements obtained in gender equity, one wonders if they still exist in our societies gendered activities (roles) at the household level. This study states an affirmative prediction. Gender role is here organized in four different nuclei: instrumentality inside and outside home for men; expressiveness and instrumentality inside home for women, pertaining to two clearly different domains (household activities for men and household activities for women). Method: 98 women and 86 men completed the Gender Roles Questionnaire (GRQ). Results: Obtained results showed that: (a) men and women do not do certain household activities (roles) with the same frequency; (b) the four-dimensional approach fits the data better than the one-dimensional and even better than the two-dimensional approach (household gender roles for men and women separately). Conclusion: Discussion focuses on the implications of these results for both research and education.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Addis, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help-seeking. American Psychologist, 58, 5-14.
  • Albelda, R. P. (1986). Occupational segregation by race and gender, 19581981. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 39, 404-411.
  • Aliaga, C. (2006). How is the time of women and men distributed in Europe. Statistics in Focus, 4, 1-11.
  • Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191-228.
  • Bodi, O., Miluka, G., & Riederer, B. (2010). Long-term effects between perceived justice in the division of domestic work and women’s relationship satisfaction: Testing for moderation effects. Social Psychology, 41, 57-65.
  • Bouffartigue, P. (2010). The gender division of paid and domestic work: Some remarks in favour of a temporal perspective. Time & Society, 19, 220-238.
  • Braun, M., Lewin-Epstein, N., Stier, H., & Baumgärtner, M.K. (2008). Perceived equity in the gendered division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1145-1156.
  • Buunk, B. P., Kluwer, E. S., Schuurman, M.K., & Siero, F.W. (2000). The division of labor among egalitarian and traditional women: Differences in discontent, social comparison, and false consensus. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30,759-779.
  • Carrasco, C., Borderías, C., & Torns, T. (Eds.) (2011). El trabajo de cuidados: historia, teoría y políticas [The care work: History, theory and politics]. Madrid: Catarata.
  • Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddeness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1208-1233.
  • Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Crompton, R., Scott, J., & C. Lyonnette, C. (Eds.) (2010). Gender inequalities in the 21st Century. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
  • Des Rivieres-Pigeon, C., Saurel-Cubizolles, M. J., & Romito, P. (2002). Division of domestic work and psychological distress 1 year after childbirth: A comparison between France, Quebec, and Italy. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 397-409.
  • Dierdorff, E. C., & Ellington, J. K. (2008). It’s the nature of the work: Examining behavior-based sources of work-family confl ict across occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 883-892.
  • Durán, M. A. (2000). Concentración y reparto del trabajo no remunerado en los hogares [Concentration and distribution of unpaid household labor]. Cuaderno de Relaciones Laborales, 17, 91-122.
  • Fernández, J. (2011). Un siglo de investigaciones sobre masculinidad y feminidad: una revisión crítica [A century of research on masculinity and femininity: A critical review]. Psichotema, 23, 167-172.
  • Fernández, J., Quiroga, M. A., Del Olmo, I., & Rodríguez, A. (2007). Escalas de masculinidad y feminidad: estado actual de la cuestión [Masculinity and femininity scales: Current state of the art]. Psicothema, 19, 357-365.
  • Fernández, J., Quiroga, M. A., Escorial, S., & Privado, J. (2014). Explicit and implicit assessment of gender roles. Psicothema, 26, 244-251.
  • Fernández, J., Quiroga, M. A., Del Olmo, I., Aróztegui, J., & Martín, A. (2011). Objective assessment of gender roles: Gender Roles Test (GRT36). The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14, 899-911.
  • Fontaine, A. M., & Matias, M. (Eds.).(2008). Work, family and personal dynamics: International perspectives. Porto, Portugal: Legis/LivPsic.
  • Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69, 751-767.
  • Hook, J. L. (2006) Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965-2003. American Sociological Review, 71, 639-660.
  • Jarman, J., Blackburn, R. M., & Racko, G. (2012). The dimensions of occupational gender segregation in industrial countries. Sociology, 46, 1003-1019.
  • Jöreskog, K. G.. & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientifi c Software International, Inc.
  • Kan, M. Y., Sullivan, O., & Gershuny, J. (2011). Gender convergence in domestic work: Discerning the effects of interactional and institutional barriers from large-scale data. Sociology, 45, 234-251.
  • Mikula, G. (1998). Division of household labor and perceived justice: A growing fi eld of research. Social Justice Research, 11, 215-241.
  • National Institute of Statistics (2015). Empleo del tiempo, conciliación trabajo y familia (actualizado 26 mayo 2015). En Mujeres y hombres en España (pp. 1-7) [Time employment, work-family balance (updated May 26, 2015). In Women and Men in Spain (pp. 1-7). Retrieved from: http://www.ine.es/ss/Satellite?L=es_ES&c=INEPublicacion_C&cid=1259924822888&p=1254735110672&pagename=ProductosYServicios%2FPYSLayout&param1=PYSDetalleGratuitas&param2=1259925472420&param4=Mostrar
  • Nayak, A., & Kehily, M. J. (2008). Gender, youth and culture: Young masculinities and femininities. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
  • Rodríguez, M. C. (2008). La distribución sexual del trabajo reproductivo [The sexual division of reproductive work]. Acciones e Investigaciones Sociales, 26, 61-90.
  • Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299-322.
  • Sullivan, O. (2000). The division of domestic labour: Twenty years of change? Sociology, 34, 437-456.
  • Treas, J., & Drobnic, S. (Eds.). (2010). Dividing the domestic: Men, women, and household work in cross-national perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Warren, T. (2011). Researching the gender division of unpaid domestic work: Practices, relationships, negotiations, and meanings. The Sociological Review, 59, 129-147.
  • Wood, W., & Eagly, A. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behaviour of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699-727.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet