¿Qué es la innovación social? El cambio de paradigma y su relación con el Trabajo Social

  1. Andoni Alonso Puelles
  2. Javier Echevarría Ezponda
Journal:
Cuadernos de trabajo social

ISSN: 0214-0314,  1988-8295

Year of publication: 2016

Volume: 29

Issue: 2

Pages: 163-171

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5209/CUTS.51752 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Cuadernos de trabajo social

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Innovation is a fundamental part of social work. In recent years there has been a shift in the innovation paradigm, making it easier to accept this relationship. National and supranational policies aimed at promoting innovation appear to be specifically guided by this idea. To be able to affirm this hypothesis, it is necessary to review the perception that social workers have of their duties. It is also useful to examine particular cases that show how such social innovation arises.

Bibliographic References

  • Aho, E., Cornu, J., Georghiou, L. y Subira, A. (2006). Creating an innovative Europe. Report of the Independent Expert Group on R&D and Innovation appointed following the Hampton Court Summit. Luxembourgo: Comisión Europea.
  • Alonso, D. (2015). Trabajo social y tecnología: Aceptación y uso entre profesionales en formación. [Tesis doctoral]Ma,drid: Facultad de Trabajo Social: Universidad Complutense, 20 de noviembre.
  • Barahona, M.J. (2015). Prostitución, abolicionismo y Trabajo Social. Las actitudes de los y las profesionales en la Comunidad de Madrid. [Tesis doctoral] Madrid: Facultad de Trabajo Social: Universidad Complutense.
  • BEPA. (2010). Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union. Report prepared by A. Hubert, M. Bonifacio and J. Konings, Bureau of European Policy Advisers. Recuperado de: http://ec.europa.eu/bepa/pdf/publications_pdf/social_innovation.pdf.
  • Chesbrough, H.W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
  • Cloutier, J. (2003). Qu’est-ce que l’innovation sociale? Les cahiers du Crises. Collection Études theóriques, ET0314. Québec: Crises.
  • Godin, B. (2008). Innovation: the History of a Category. Montreal: INRS, Project of Intellectual History of Innovation.
  • Godin, B. (2010). Social Innovation. Montreal: INRS, Project of Intellectual History of Innovation.
  • Godin, B. (2015). Innovation Contested – The Idea of Innovation Over the Centuries. Londres: Routledge.
  • Goldenberg, M. (2004). Social Innovation in Canada. How the non-profit sector serves Canadians... and how it can serve them better. Ottawa: Canada Policy Research Networks.
  • Gouvernement de Québec, Conseil québécois de la recherche sociale. (CQRS) (1999). En: Camil Bouchard y Groupe de travail sur l’innovation sociale (GTIS), Recherche en sciences humaines et sociales et innovations sociales. Contribution á une politique de l’immatériel. Québec: Les Publications du Québec.
  • Illich, I. (1981). Profesiones inhabilitantes. Barcelona: Blume.
  • Kolmes, K. y Taube, D.O. (2010). Clinical implications of therapist-client interactions on the Internet: Boundary considerations in cyberspace. San Francisco: American Psychological Association Division of Psychotherapy.
  • Mulgan, G., Tucker S., Rushanara, A. y Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation: what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Oxford: Oxford Said Business School.
  • Nandan, M., London, M. y Bent-Goodley, T. (2015). Social Workers as Social Change Agents: Social Innovation, Social Intrapreneurship, and Social Entrepreneurship. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(1), 38-56.
  • NASW. (2005). Standards for Technology and Social Work Practice. Recuperado de: http://www.socialworkers. org/practice/standards/NASWTechnologyStandards.pdf (consultado el 23-01-2016).
  • NESTA. (2006). The Innovation Gap: Why Policy Needs to Reflect the Reality of Innovation in the UK.Policy Briefing IG/02, NESTA Policy and Research Unit. London: NESTA.
  • OECD. (2002). Frascati Manual, Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. París: OECD.
  • OECD. (2005 [1992]). OECD Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data: Oslo Manual. París: OECD.
  • Parker-Oliver, D. y Demiris, G. (2006). Social work informatics: A new specialty. Social Work, 51(2), 127-134.
  • Parker, D.B., Swope, S. y Baker, B.N. (1990). Ethical conflicts: in information and computer science, technology, and business. Massachusetts: QED Information Sciences, Inc.
  • Pawar, M. (2014). Social Challenges and Policy Innovations by Social Workers in Australia. Center for Social Development, Saint Luis: Washington University Saint Luis. Recuperado de:
  • http://csd.wustl.edu/Publications/Documents/WP14-10.pdf. (Consultado el 22/01/2016).
  • Reamer, F.G. (2013). The digital and electronic revolution in social work: Rethinking the meaning of ethical practice. Ethics and social welfare, 7(1), 2-19.
  • Rogers, E.K. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. (4ª edición). Nueva York: The Free Press.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (2008[1939]). Business Cycles. Nueva York, Toronto, Londres: McGraw-Hill. (Edición electrónica de D. Lagrange). Quebec, Canadá, 2008, 80 (consultado el 15-8-2011).
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1975[1942]). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. (2ª edición). Nueva York: Harper & Row.
  • Von Hippel, E. (2006). Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press Books, 1.
Data source: Dialnet