Una revisión de la investigación educativa sobre autoeficacia y teoría cognitivo social en Hispanoamérica

  1. Yadira Casas Moreno 1
  2. Ángeles Blanco Blanco 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Bordón: Revista de pedagogía

ISSN: 0210-5934,  2340-6577

Ano de publicación: 2016

Volume: 68

Número: 4

Páxinas: 27-47

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.13042/BORDON.2016.44637 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Bordón: Revista de pedagogía

Resumo

INTRODUCTION. Educational research on the self-efficacy construct and the Social Cognitive Theory has been very abundant in the last three decades. The results obtained in the various lines of work have been summarized in qualitative and quantitative reviews, although primarily consi-dering scientific production of Anglo-Saxon origin published in English. In the context of this background, this study intends to review research conducted in this area in Hispanic America, in order to determine the existence, volume and nature of the empirical studies carried out and to identify future lines of research. METHOD. A review of research published was conducted on the basis of a systematic search on the SciELO, RedALyc, Scopus and Dialnet Plus databases. 58 em-pirical studies were identified that covered the previously established criteria for inclusion. The studies were classified by thematic area, type of study and methodological design. Samples, so-cio-cognitive variables and measures, and analysis techniques were also analyzed. RESULTS. There is evidence of the existence in the region of studies in all the classic lines of research rela-ting to the Social Cognitive Theory, albeit with an uneven degree of development. There is a clear predominance of work in the area of self-efficacy, performance and motivation (46%), followed by psychometric style studies (28%), studies in the area of teacher self-efficacy (17%) and studies on Vocational Self-Efficacy and SCCT (9%). DISCUSSION. Based on the results, the paper presents a general diagnosis of the state of the empirical research on self-efficacy and the Social Cognitive Theory in Hispanic America, which so far has not been available. This new systematic knowledge made it possible to identify, among other aspects, specific research areas requiring development in the region from a broad base of evidence.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191-215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
  • Berry, J. W., Segall, M. H., y Poortinga, Y. P. (eds.) (2002). Cross-Cultural Psychology: Research and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brown, S., Tramayne, S., Hoxha, D., Telander, K., Fan, X., y Lent, R. W. (2008). Social cognitive predictors of college students’ academic performance and persistence: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 298-308. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.09.003.
  • Chesnut, S. R., y Burley, H. (2015). Self-efficacy as a predictor of commitment to the teaching profession: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 15, 1-16. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.001
  • Dinther, M., Dochy, F., y Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6, 95-108. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003.
  • Honicke, T., y Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63-84. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002.
  • Huang, C. (2013). Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 1-35. doi: 10.1007/s10212-011-0097-y.
  • Klassen, R. M., y Tze, V. M. C. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59-76. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001.
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., y Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45 (1), 79-122. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027.
  • Miguel, S. (2011). Revistas y producción científica de América Latina y el Caribe: su visibilidad en SciELO, RedALyC y Scopus. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 34 (2), 187-199.
  • Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., y Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30-38. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30.
  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66 (4), 543-578. doi: 10.3102/00346543066004543.
  • Pérez, E. (2001). Construcción de un inventario de autoeficacia para inteligencias múltiples. Tesis doctoral. Inédita. Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina.
  • Pérez, E., y Cupani, M. (2008). Validation of the multiple intelligences self-efficacy inventory revised (MISEIR). Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 40, 47-58.
  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. T. García, T., y McKeachie, W. (1991). A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. University of Michigan.
  • Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., y Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130 (2), 261-288. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261.
  • Rottinghaus, P. J., Larson, L. M., y Borgen, F. H. (2003). The relation of self-efficacy and interests: A meta-analysis of 60 samples. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62 (2), 203-388. doi: 10.1016/S00018791(02)00039-8.
  • Sharma, U., T. Loreman, y Forlin, W. (2012). “Measuring Teacher Efficacy to ImplementInclusive Practices”. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12, 12-21. doi:10.1111/j.14713802.2011.01200.x
  • Sheu, H., Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Miller, M. J., Hennessy, K. D., y Duffy. R. D. (2010). Testing the choice model of social cognitive career theory across Holland themes: A meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 252-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2009.10.015.
  • TschannenMoran, M., y Woolfolk, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1.
  • Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., y Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: a meta-analityc review. Educational Psychologist, 39 (2), 111-133. doi: 10.1207/ s15326985ep3902_3.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet