Intervenciones para ralentizar la progresión de miopía en niños. Resultados de meta-análisis

  1. Alicia Ruiz Pomeda
  2. Francisco Luis Prieto Garrido
  3. César Villa Collar
Revista:
Gaceta de optometría y óptica oftálmica

ISSN: 2173-9366

Año de publicación: 2016

Número: 514

Páginas: 68-74

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Gaceta de optometría y óptica oftálmica

Resumen

El aumento de la prevalencia de la miopía y su relación con las complicaciones oculares hace que se haya convertido en un tema de salud pública destacado e incluso de interés general. La miopía no es solo un defecto refractivo sino que es una condición ocular compleja, multifactorial, que provoca importantes costes económicos y sociales. Este cambio de paradigma ha propiciado el aumento exponencial de publicaciones relacionadas con el control de su progresión. Las revisiones sistemáticas y los meta-análisis tienen como objetivo seleccionar con rigor todos los trabajos relacionados con el tema, unificarlos de forma sistemática y analizar y sintetizar sus resultados, proporcionando así a los profesionales de la salud la mejor evidencia científica resumida sobre los métodos de intervención posibles. De esta manera, podremos usar esta información, junto con nuestra experiencia y juicio clínico, en la toma de decisiones de nuestros pacientes miopes.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Sherwin JC, Reacher MH, Keogh RH, Khawaja AP, Mackey DA, Foster PJ. The association between time spent outdoors and myopia in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2012;119(10):2141-51.
  • Pan C, Ramamurthy D, Saw S. Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2012; 32(1):3-16.
  • Pan C, Dirani M, Cheng C, Wong T, Saw S. The age-specific prevalence of myopia in Asia: a meta-analysis. Optom Vis Sci 2015;92(3):258-66.
  • Williams KM, Verhoeven VJM, Cumberland P, Bertelsen G, Wolfram C, Buitendijk GHS, et al. Prevalence of refractive error in Europe: the European Eye Epidemiology (E(3)) Consortium. Eur J Epidemiol 2015;30(4):305-15.
  • Lin LLK, Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Chen CJ. Prevalence of myopia in Taiwanese schoolchildren: 1983 to 2000. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2004 ;33(1):27-33.
  • Saw S, Gazzard G, Shih-Yen E, Chua W. Myopia and associated pathological complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005; 25(5):381-91.
  • Lim R, Mitchell P, Cumming RG. Refractive associations with cataract: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999 ;40(12):3021-6.
  • Chen S, Lu P, Zhang W, Lu J. High myopia as a risk factor in primary open angle glaucoma. Int J Ophthalmol 2012;5(6):750-3.
  • Perera SA, Wong TY, Tay W, Foster PJ, Saw S, Aung T. Refractive error, axial dimensions, and primary open-angle glaucoma: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 2010;128(7):900-5.
  • Metzdorff M. Evidence-based medicine: what it is, what it isn’t, and are we practicing it?. The Journal Of Trauma And Acute Care Surgery 2013;75(6): 927-35.
  • New grades for recommendations from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal De L’association Medicale Canadienne 2003; 169(3): 207-8.
  • Khalidl S Khan, Regina Kunz, Jos Kleijnen & Gerd Antes. Systematic Reviews to Suppport Evidence-Based Medicine, how to review and apply findings of healthcare research, RMS Press. London 2004.
  • Epidemiología: diseño y análisis de estudios. Mauricio Hernández Ávila. Ed. Médica Panamericana, 2007
  • Sacket DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Medicina basada en la evidencia. Cómo practicar y enseñar la medicina basada en la evidencia. 2ª ed. Madrid: Elsevier Science, 2002. http://hdl.handle. net/10366/123467.
  • Walline JJ, Lindsley K, Vedula SS, Cotter SA, Mutti DO, Twelker JD. Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011 12/07(12):CD004916.
  • Adler D, Millodot M. The possible effect of undercorrection on myopic progression in children. Clinical & Experimental Optometry 2006; 89(5): 315-21.
  • Chung K, Mohidin N, O’Leary D,J. Undercorrection of myopia enhances rather than inhibits myopia progression. Vision Res 2002;42(22):2555-9.
  • Gwiazda JE, Hyman L, Norton TT, Hussein MEM, Marsh-Tootle W, Manny R, et al. Accommodation and related risk factors associated with myopia progression and their interaction with treatment in COMET children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45(7):2143-51.
  • Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Hayes JR, Jones LA, Moeschberger ML, Cotter SA, et al. Accommodative lag before and after the onset of myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47(3):837-46.
  • Li S, Ji Y, Wu S, Zhan S, Wang B, Wang J, et al. Multifocal versus single vision lenses intervention to slow progression of myopia in school-age children: a meta-analysis. Survey Of Ophthalmology 2011; 56(5): 451-60.
  • Sankaridurg P, Donovan L, Varnas S, Ho A, Chen X, Martinez A, et al. Spectacle lenses designed to reduce progression of myopia: 12-month results. Optometry and Vision Science 2010;87(9):631–41
  • Aller TA, Wildsoet C. Bifocal soft contact lenses as a possible myopia control treatment: a case report involving identical twins. Clin Exp Optom 2008;91(4):394-9.
  • Walline J, Jones L, Mutti D, Zadnik K. A randomized trial of the effects of rigid contact lenses on myopia progression. Archives Of Ophthalmology 2004;122(12): 1760-6.
  • Katz J, Schein OD, Levy B, Cruiscullo T, Saw SM, RajanU, et al.A randomized trial of rigid gas permeable contact lenses to reduce progression of children’s myopia. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2003;136(1):82–90.
  • Si J, Tang K, Bi H, Guo D, Guo J, Wang X. Orthokeratology for myopia control: a meta-analysis. Optom Vis Sci 2015;92(3):252-7.
  • Sun Y, Xu F, Zhang T, Liu M, Wang D, Chen Y, et al. Orthokeratology to control myopia progression: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015 ;10(4).
  • Wen D, Huang J, Chen H, Bao F, Savini G, Calossi A, et al. Efficacy and Acceptability of Orthokeratology for Slowing Myopic Progression in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Ophthalmol. 2015.
  • Li S, Kang M, Wu S, Liu L, Li H, Wang N, et al. Efficacy, Safety and Acceptability of Orthokeratology on Slowing Axial Elongation in Myopic Children by Meta-Analysis. Current Eye Research 2015; 1-9.
  • Ganesan P, Wildsoet CF. Pharmaceutical intervention for myopia control. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 2010;5(6):759-87.
  • McBrien NA, Stell WK, Carr B. How does atropine exert its anti-myopia effects? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2013;33(3):373-78.
  • Li S, Wu S, Kang M, Liu Y, Jia S, Li S, et al. Atropine slows myopia progression more in Asian than white children by meta-analysis. Optom Vis Sci 2014;91(3):342-50.
  • Sherwin JC, Reacher MH, Keogh RH, Khawaja AP, Mackey DA, Foster PJ. The association between time spent outdoors and myopia in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2012;119(10):2141-51.
  • Yang C, Hao Z, Zhang L, Guo Q. Efficacy and safety of acupuncture in children: an overview of systematic reviews. Pediatr Res 2015;78(2):112-19.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet